Cargando…

The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events

BACKGROUND: Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk of the development of, often preventable, adverse events (AEs), which threaten patient safety. Guidelines for prevention of many types of AEs are available, however, compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. Besides genera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Gaal, Betsie GI, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Hulscher, Marlies EJL, Mintjes, Joke AJ, Borm, George F, Koopmans, Raymond TCM, van Achterberg, Theo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-58
_version_ 1782166706350718976
author van Gaal, Betsie GI
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
Mintjes, Joke AJ
Borm, George F
Koopmans, Raymond TCM
van Achterberg, Theo
author_facet van Gaal, Betsie GI
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
Mintjes, Joke AJ
Borm, George F
Koopmans, Raymond TCM
van Achterberg, Theo
author_sort van Gaal, Betsie GI
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk of the development of, often preventable, adverse events (AEs), which threaten patient safety. Guidelines for prevention of many types of AEs are available, however, compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. Besides general barriers that inhibit implementation, this non-compliance is associated with the large number of guidelines competing for attention. As implementation of a guideline is time-consuming, it is difficult for organisations to implement all available guidelines. Another problem is lack of feedback about performance using quality indicators of guideline based care and lack of a recognisable, unambiguous system for implementation. A program that allows organisations to implement multiple guidelines simultaneously may facilitate guideline use and thus improve patient safety. The aim of this study is to develop and test such an integral patient safety program that addresses several AEs simultaneously in hospitals and nursing homes. This paper reports the design of this study. METHODS AND DESIGN: The patient safety program addresses three AEs: pressure ulcers, falls and urinary tract infections. It consists of bundles and outcome and process indicators based on the existing evidence based guidelines. In addition it includes a multifaceted tailored implementation strategy: education, patient involvement, and a computerized registration and feedback system. The patient safety program was tested in a cluster randomised trial on ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards. The baseline period was three months followed by the implementation of the patient safety program for fourteen months. Subsequently the follow-up period was nine months. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of AEs on every ward. Secondary outcome measures were the utilization of preventive interventions and the knowledge of nurses regarding the three topics. Randomisation took place on ward level. The results will be analysed separately for hospitals and nursing homes. DISCUSSION: Major challenges were the development of the patient safety program including a digital registration and feedback system and the implementation of the patient safety program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID [NCT00365430]
format Text
id pubmed-2675519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26755192009-04-30 The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events van Gaal, Betsie GI Schoonhoven, Lisette Hulscher, Marlies EJL Mintjes, Joke AJ Borm, George F Koopmans, Raymond TCM van Achterberg, Theo BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk of the development of, often preventable, adverse events (AEs), which threaten patient safety. Guidelines for prevention of many types of AEs are available, however, compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. Besides general barriers that inhibit implementation, this non-compliance is associated with the large number of guidelines competing for attention. As implementation of a guideline is time-consuming, it is difficult for organisations to implement all available guidelines. Another problem is lack of feedback about performance using quality indicators of guideline based care and lack of a recognisable, unambiguous system for implementation. A program that allows organisations to implement multiple guidelines simultaneously may facilitate guideline use and thus improve patient safety. The aim of this study is to develop and test such an integral patient safety program that addresses several AEs simultaneously in hospitals and nursing homes. This paper reports the design of this study. METHODS AND DESIGN: The patient safety program addresses three AEs: pressure ulcers, falls and urinary tract infections. It consists of bundles and outcome and process indicators based on the existing evidence based guidelines. In addition it includes a multifaceted tailored implementation strategy: education, patient involvement, and a computerized registration and feedback system. The patient safety program was tested in a cluster randomised trial on ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards. The baseline period was three months followed by the implementation of the patient safety program for fourteen months. Subsequently the follow-up period was nine months. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of AEs on every ward. Secondary outcome measures were the utilization of preventive interventions and the knowledge of nurses regarding the three topics. Randomisation took place on ward level. The results will be analysed separately for hospitals and nursing homes. DISCUSSION: Major challenges were the development of the patient safety program including a digital registration and feedback system and the implementation of the patient safety program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID [NCT00365430] BioMed Central 2009-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2675519/ /pubmed/19338655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-58 Text en Copyright © 2009 van Gaal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Gaal, Betsie GI
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
Mintjes, Joke AJ
Borm, George F
Koopmans, Raymond TCM
van Achterberg, Theo
The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title_full The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title_fullStr The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title_full_unstemmed The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title_short The design of the SAFE or SORRY? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
title_sort design of the safe or sorry? study: a cluster randomised trial on the development and testing of an evidence based inpatient safety program for the prevention of adverse events
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-58
work_keys_str_mv AT vangaalbetsiegi thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT schoonhovenlisette thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT hulschermarliesejl thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT mintjesjokeaj thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT bormgeorgef thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT koopmansraymondtcm thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT vanachterbergtheo thedesignofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT vangaalbetsiegi designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT schoonhovenlisette designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT hulschermarliesejl designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT mintjesjokeaj designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT bormgeorgef designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT koopmansraymondtcm designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents
AT vanachterbergtheo designofthesafeorsorrystudyaclusterrandomisedtrialonthedevelopmentandtestingofanevidencebasedinpatientsafetyprogramforthepreventionofadverseevents