Cargando…
Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455249 |
_version_ | 1782166719413878784 |
---|---|
author | Dossat, Nadège Mangé, Alain Solassol, Jérôme Jacot, William Lhermitte, Ludovic Maudelonde, Thierry Daurès, Jean-Pierre Molinari, Nicolas |
author_facet | Dossat, Nadège Mangé, Alain Solassol, Jérôme Jacot, William Lhermitte, Ludovic Maudelonde, Thierry Daurès, Jean-Pierre Molinari, Nicolas |
author_sort | Dossat, Nadège |
collection | PubMed |
description | A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2675844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26758442009-05-19 Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis Dossat, Nadège Mangé, Alain Solassol, Jérôme Jacot, William Lhermitte, Ludovic Maudelonde, Thierry Daurès, Jean-Pierre Molinari, Nicolas Cancer Inform Original Research A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested. Libertas Academica 2007-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2675844/ /pubmed/19455249 Text en © 2007 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dossat, Nadège Mangé, Alain Solassol, Jérôme Jacot, William Lhermitte, Ludovic Maudelonde, Thierry Daurès, Jean-Pierre Molinari, Nicolas Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title | Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title_full | Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title_short | Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis |
title_sort | comparison of supervised classification methods for protein profiling in cancer diagnosis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dossatnadege comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT mangealain comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT solassoljerome comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT jacotwilliam comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT lhermitteludovic comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT maudelondethierry comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT dauresjeanpierre comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis AT molinarinicolas comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis |