Cargando…

Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis

A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dossat, Nadège, Mangé, Alain, Solassol, Jérôme, Jacot, William, Lhermitte, Ludovic, Maudelonde, Thierry, Daurès, Jean-Pierre, Molinari, Nicolas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455249
_version_ 1782166719413878784
author Dossat, Nadège
Mangé, Alain
Solassol, Jérôme
Jacot, William
Lhermitte, Ludovic
Maudelonde, Thierry
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Molinari, Nicolas
author_facet Dossat, Nadège
Mangé, Alain
Solassol, Jérôme
Jacot, William
Lhermitte, Ludovic
Maudelonde, Thierry
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Molinari, Nicolas
author_sort Dossat, Nadège
collection PubMed
description A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested.
format Text
id pubmed-2675844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26758442009-05-19 Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis Dossat, Nadège Mangé, Alain Solassol, Jérôme Jacot, William Lhermitte, Ludovic Maudelonde, Thierry Daurès, Jean-Pierre Molinari, Nicolas Cancer Inform Original Research A key challenge in clinical proteomics of cancer is the identification of biomarkers that could allow detection, diagnosis and prognosis of the diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic instrumentations offer unique chance to rapidly identify these markers. These advances pose considerable challenges, similar to those created by microarray-based investigation, for the discovery of pattern of markers from high-dimensional data, specific to each pathologic state (e.g. normal vs cancer). We propose a three-step strategy to select important markers from high-dimensional mass spectrometry data using surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) technology. The first two steps are the selection of the most discriminating biomarkers with a construction of different classifiers. Finally, we compare and validate their performance and robustness using different supervised classification methods such as Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Neural Networks, Classification Trees and Boosting Trees. We show that the proposed method is suitable for analysing high-throughput proteomics data and that the combination of logistic regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis outperform other methods tested. Libertas Academica 2007-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2675844/ /pubmed/19455249 Text en © 2007 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dossat, Nadège
Mangé, Alain
Solassol, Jérôme
Jacot, William
Lhermitte, Ludovic
Maudelonde, Thierry
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Molinari, Nicolas
Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title_full Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title_short Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Protein Profiling in Cancer Diagnosis
title_sort comparison of supervised classification methods for protein profiling in cancer diagnosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455249
work_keys_str_mv AT dossatnadege comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT mangealain comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT solassoljerome comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT jacotwilliam comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT lhermitteludovic comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT maudelondethierry comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT dauresjeanpierre comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis
AT molinarinicolas comparisonofsupervisedclassificationmethodsforproteinprofilingincancerdiagnosis