Cargando…

Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study

INTRODUCTION: As an alternative to DNA microarrays, mass spectrometry based analysis of proteomic patterns has shown great potential in cancer diagnosis. The ultimate application of this technique in clinical settings relies on the advancement of the technology itself and the maturity of the computa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Changyu, Breen, Timothy E, Dobrolecki, Lacey E, Schmidt, C. Max, Sledge, George W., Miller, Kathy D., Hickey, Robert J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455252
_version_ 1782166722228256768
author Shen, Changyu
Breen, Timothy E
Dobrolecki, Lacey E
Schmidt, C. Max
Sledge, George W.
Miller, Kathy D.
Hickey, Robert J
author_facet Shen, Changyu
Breen, Timothy E
Dobrolecki, Lacey E
Schmidt, C. Max
Sledge, George W.
Miller, Kathy D.
Hickey, Robert J
author_sort Shen, Changyu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: As an alternative to DNA microarrays, mass spectrometry based analysis of proteomic patterns has shown great potential in cancer diagnosis. The ultimate application of this technique in clinical settings relies on the advancement of the technology itself and the maturity of the computational tools used to analyze the data. A number of computational algorithms constructed on different principles are available for the classification of disease status based on proteomic patterns. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the difference in the performance of these approaches. In this report, we describe a comparative case study on the classification accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the serum proteomic pattern generated from a Surface Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometer. METHODS: Nine supervised classification algorithms are implemented in R software and compared for the classification accuracy. RESULTS: We found that the support vector machine with radial function is preferable as a tool for classification of hepatocellular carcinoma using features in SELDI mass spectra. Among the rest of the methods, random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays have better performance. A permutation-based technique reveals that the support vector machine with a radial function seems intrinsically superior in learning from the training data since it has a lower prediction error than others when there is essentially no differential signal. On the other hand, the performance of the random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays rely on their capability of capturing the signals with substantial differentiation between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding is similar to a previous study, where classification methods based on the Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry are compared for the prediction accuracy of ovarian cancer. The support vector machine, random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays provide better prediction accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma using SELDI proteomic data than six other approaches.
format Text
id pubmed-2675858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26758582009-05-19 Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study Shen, Changyu Breen, Timothy E Dobrolecki, Lacey E Schmidt, C. Max Sledge, George W. Miller, Kathy D. Hickey, Robert J Cancer Inform Original Research INTRODUCTION: As an alternative to DNA microarrays, mass spectrometry based analysis of proteomic patterns has shown great potential in cancer diagnosis. The ultimate application of this technique in clinical settings relies on the advancement of the technology itself and the maturity of the computational tools used to analyze the data. A number of computational algorithms constructed on different principles are available for the classification of disease status based on proteomic patterns. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the difference in the performance of these approaches. In this report, we describe a comparative case study on the classification accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the serum proteomic pattern generated from a Surface Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometer. METHODS: Nine supervised classification algorithms are implemented in R software and compared for the classification accuracy. RESULTS: We found that the support vector machine with radial function is preferable as a tool for classification of hepatocellular carcinoma using features in SELDI mass spectra. Among the rest of the methods, random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays have better performance. A permutation-based technique reveals that the support vector machine with a radial function seems intrinsically superior in learning from the training data since it has a lower prediction error than others when there is essentially no differential signal. On the other hand, the performance of the random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays rely on their capability of capturing the signals with substantial differentiation between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding is similar to a previous study, where classification methods based on the Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry are compared for the prediction accuracy of ovarian cancer. The support vector machine, random forest and prediction analysis of microarrays provide better prediction accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma using SELDI proteomic data than six other approaches. Libertas Academica 2007-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2675858/ /pubmed/19455252 Text en © 2007 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shen, Changyu
Breen, Timothy E
Dobrolecki, Lacey E
Schmidt, C. Max
Sledge, George W.
Miller, Kathy D.
Hickey, Robert J
Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title_full Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title_short Comparison of Computational Algorithms for the Classification of Liver Cancer using SELDI Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study
title_sort comparison of computational algorithms for the classification of liver cancer using seldi mass spectrometry: a case study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19455252
work_keys_str_mv AT shenchangyu comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT breentimothye comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT dobroleckilaceye comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT schmidtcmax comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT sledgegeorgew comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT millerkathyd comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy
AT hickeyrobertj comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsfortheclassificationoflivercancerusingseldimassspectrometryacasestudy