Cargando…

Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments

BACKGROUND: Quality assessment methods, that are common place in engineering and industrial production, are not widely spread in large-scale proteomics experiments. But modern technologies such as Multi-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) produce large quantities o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole, Machtejevas, Egidijus, Reinert, Knut, Schlüter, Hartmut, Thiemann, Joachim, Unger, Klaus
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19351414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-2-4
_version_ 1782166823300497408
author Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole
Machtejevas, Egidijus
Reinert, Knut
Schlüter, Hartmut
Thiemann, Joachim
Unger, Klaus
author_facet Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole
Machtejevas, Egidijus
Reinert, Knut
Schlüter, Hartmut
Thiemann, Joachim
Unger, Klaus
author_sort Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality assessment methods, that are common place in engineering and industrial production, are not widely spread in large-scale proteomics experiments. But modern technologies such as Multi-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) produce large quantities of proteomic data. These data are prone to measurement errors and reproducibility problems such that an automatic quality assessment and control become increasingly important. RESULTS: We propose a methodology to assess the quality and reproducibility of data generated in quantitative LC-MS experiments. We introduce quality descriptors that capture different aspects of the quality and reproducibility of LC-MS data sets. Our method is based on the Mahalanobis distance and a robust Principal Component Analysis. CONCLUSION: We evaluate our approach on several data sets of different complexities and show that we are able to precisely detect LC-MS runs of poor signal quality in large-scale studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2678124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26781242009-05-07 Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole Machtejevas, Egidijus Reinert, Knut Schlüter, Hartmut Thiemann, Joachim Unger, Klaus BioData Min Methodology BACKGROUND: Quality assessment methods, that are common place in engineering and industrial production, are not widely spread in large-scale proteomics experiments. But modern technologies such as Multi-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) produce large quantities of proteomic data. These data are prone to measurement errors and reproducibility problems such that an automatic quality assessment and control become increasingly important. RESULTS: We propose a methodology to assess the quality and reproducibility of data generated in quantitative LC-MS experiments. We introduce quality descriptors that capture different aspects of the quality and reproducibility of LC-MS data sets. Our method is based on the Mahalanobis distance and a robust Principal Component Analysis. CONCLUSION: We evaluate our approach on several data sets of different complexities and show that we are able to precisely detect LC-MS runs of poor signal quality in large-scale studies. BioMed Central 2009-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2678124/ /pubmed/19351414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-2-4 Text en Copyright © 2009 Schulz-Trieglaff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Schulz-Trieglaff, Ole
Machtejevas, Egidijus
Reinert, Knut
Schlüter, Hartmut
Thiemann, Joachim
Unger, Klaus
Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title_full Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title_fullStr Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title_full_unstemmed Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title_short Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
title_sort statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19351414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-2-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schulztrieglaffole statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments
AT machtejevasegidijus statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments
AT reinertknut statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments
AT schluterhartmut statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments
AT thiemannjoachim statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments
AT ungerklaus statisticalqualityassessmentandoutlierdetectionforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryexperiments