Cargando…

Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches

BACKGROUND: Drawing from previous studies, the traditional routine diagnostic microbiology evaluation of samples from chronic respiratory conditions may provide an incomplete picture of the bacteria present in airways disease. Here, the aim was to determine the extent to which routine diagnostic mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, Geraint B, Daniels, Thomas WV, Tuck, Andrew, Carroll, Mary P, Connett, Gary J, David, Gondi JP, Bruce, Kenneth D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19368727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-9-14
_version_ 1782166859995414528
author Rogers, Geraint B
Daniels, Thomas WV
Tuck, Andrew
Carroll, Mary P
Connett, Gary J
David, Gondi JP
Bruce, Kenneth D
author_facet Rogers, Geraint B
Daniels, Thomas WV
Tuck, Andrew
Carroll, Mary P
Connett, Gary J
David, Gondi JP
Bruce, Kenneth D
author_sort Rogers, Geraint B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drawing from previous studies, the traditional routine diagnostic microbiology evaluation of samples from chronic respiratory conditions may provide an incomplete picture of the bacteria present in airways disease. Here, the aim was to determine the extent to which routine diagnostic microbiology gave a different assessment of the species present in sputa when analysed by using culture-independent assessment. METHODS: Six different media used in routine diagnostic microbiology were inoculated with sputum from twelve patients. Bacterial growth on these plates was harvested and both RNA and DNA extracted. DNA and RNA were also extracted directly from the same sample of sputum. All nucleic acids served as templates for PCR and reverse transcriptase-PCR amplification of "broad range" bacterial 16S rRNA gene regions. The regions amplified were separated by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) profiling and compared to assess the degree of overlap between approaches. RESULTS: A mean of 16.3 (SD 10.0) separate T-RF band lengths in the profiles from each sputum sample by Direct Molecular Analysis, with a mean of 8.8 (SD 5.8) resolved by DNA profiling and 13.3 (SD 8.0) resolved by RNA profiling. In comparison, 8.8 (SD 4.4) T-RF bands were resolved in profiles generated by Culture-derived Molecular Analysis. There were a total of 184 instances of T-RF bands detected in the direct sputum profiles but not in the corresponding culture-derived profiles, representing 83 different T-RF band lengths. Amongst these were fifteen instances where the T-RF band represented more than 10% of the total band volume (with a mean value of 23.6%). Eight different T-RF band lengths were resolved as the dominant band in profiles generated directly from sputum. Of these, only three were detected in profiles generated from the corresponding set of cultures. CONCLUSION: Due to their focus on isolation of a small group of recognised pathogens, the use of culture-dependent methods to analyse samples from chronic respiratory infections can provide a restricted understanding of the bacterial species present. The use of a culture-independent molecular approach here identifies that there are many bacterial species in samples from CF and COPD patients that may be clinically relevant.
format Text
id pubmed-2678980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26789802009-05-08 Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches Rogers, Geraint B Daniels, Thomas WV Tuck, Andrew Carroll, Mary P Connett, Gary J David, Gondi JP Bruce, Kenneth D BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Drawing from previous studies, the traditional routine diagnostic microbiology evaluation of samples from chronic respiratory conditions may provide an incomplete picture of the bacteria present in airways disease. Here, the aim was to determine the extent to which routine diagnostic microbiology gave a different assessment of the species present in sputa when analysed by using culture-independent assessment. METHODS: Six different media used in routine diagnostic microbiology were inoculated with sputum from twelve patients. Bacterial growth on these plates was harvested and both RNA and DNA extracted. DNA and RNA were also extracted directly from the same sample of sputum. All nucleic acids served as templates for PCR and reverse transcriptase-PCR amplification of "broad range" bacterial 16S rRNA gene regions. The regions amplified were separated by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) profiling and compared to assess the degree of overlap between approaches. RESULTS: A mean of 16.3 (SD 10.0) separate T-RF band lengths in the profiles from each sputum sample by Direct Molecular Analysis, with a mean of 8.8 (SD 5.8) resolved by DNA profiling and 13.3 (SD 8.0) resolved by RNA profiling. In comparison, 8.8 (SD 4.4) T-RF bands were resolved in profiles generated by Culture-derived Molecular Analysis. There were a total of 184 instances of T-RF bands detected in the direct sputum profiles but not in the corresponding culture-derived profiles, representing 83 different T-RF band lengths. Amongst these were fifteen instances where the T-RF band represented more than 10% of the total band volume (with a mean value of 23.6%). Eight different T-RF band lengths were resolved as the dominant band in profiles generated directly from sputum. Of these, only three were detected in profiles generated from the corresponding set of cultures. CONCLUSION: Due to their focus on isolation of a small group of recognised pathogens, the use of culture-dependent methods to analyse samples from chronic respiratory infections can provide a restricted understanding of the bacterial species present. The use of a culture-independent molecular approach here identifies that there are many bacterial species in samples from CF and COPD patients that may be clinically relevant. BioMed Central 2009-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2678980/ /pubmed/19368727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-9-14 Text en Copyright © 2009 Rogers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rogers, Geraint B
Daniels, Thomas WV
Tuck, Andrew
Carroll, Mary P
Connett, Gary J
David, Gondi JP
Bruce, Kenneth D
Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title_full Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title_fullStr Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title_full_unstemmed Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title_short Studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
title_sort studying bacteria in respiratory specimens by using conventional and molecular microbiological approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19368727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-9-14
work_keys_str_mv AT rogersgeraintb studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT danielsthomaswv studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT tuckandrew studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT carrollmaryp studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT connettgaryj studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT davidgondijp studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches
AT brucekennethd studyingbacteriainrespiratoryspecimensbyusingconventionalandmolecularmicrobiologicalapproaches