Cargando…

Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration

BACKGROUND: In 1985 medical schools were integrated into the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Health and Medical Education was created in Iran. Under this infrastructure education, research and service provision are unified, and it is expected that collaboration between researchers and decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majdzadeh, Reza, Nedjat, Saharnaz, Gholami, Jaleh, Nedjat, Sima, Maleki, Katayoun, Qorbani, Mostafa, Shokoohi, Mostafa, Ashoorkhani, Mahnaz
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19386131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-8
_version_ 1782166865980686336
author Majdzadeh, Reza
Nedjat, Saharnaz
Gholami, Jaleh
Nedjat, Sima
Maleki, Katayoun
Qorbani, Mostafa
Shokoohi, Mostafa
Ashoorkhani, Mahnaz
author_facet Majdzadeh, Reza
Nedjat, Saharnaz
Gholami, Jaleh
Nedjat, Sima
Maleki, Katayoun
Qorbani, Mostafa
Shokoohi, Mostafa
Ashoorkhani, Mahnaz
author_sort Majdzadeh, Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 1985 medical schools were integrated into the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Health and Medical Education was created in Iran. Under this infrastructure education, research and service provision are unified, and it is expected that collaboration between researchers and decision makers become easier in such an integrated context. The question here is how the researchers behavior in the biggest medical university of the country towards collaboration is, i.e. how much do decision makers participate in different stages of research? Which factors affect it? METHODOLOGY: The samples under study were all Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) completed research projects that had gotten grants in 2004 and were over by the time this study was done. Two questionnaires were designed for this study: i) the research checklist which was filled for 301 projects, ii) the researcher's questionnaire, which was sent to principle investigators, 208 of which were collected. Multiple linear regression analysis was used for evaluating the potential factors affecting individuals 'collaboration score'. RESULTS: Only 2.2 percent of TUMS' projects initiated in 2004 have had collaboration as a joint PI or co-investigator from non-academic organizations. The principle investigators mean collaboration score was 2.09, where 6 was the total score. So the collaboration score obtained was 35%. The 'type of research' had significant association with the collaboration score which is shown in the linear regression; collaboration was seen more in clinical (p = 0.007) and health system researches (p = 0.001) as compared to basic research. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that not many individuals collaborated as co-investigators from outside the university. This finding shows that research policy makers need to introduce interventions in this field. And assessment of barriers to collaboration and its facilitating factors should be considered in order to make it actually happen.
format Text
id pubmed-2679006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26790062009-05-08 Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration Majdzadeh, Reza Nedjat, Saharnaz Gholami, Jaleh Nedjat, Sima Maleki, Katayoun Qorbani, Mostafa Shokoohi, Mostafa Ashoorkhani, Mahnaz Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In 1985 medical schools were integrated into the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Health and Medical Education was created in Iran. Under this infrastructure education, research and service provision are unified, and it is expected that collaboration between researchers and decision makers become easier in such an integrated context. The question here is how the researchers behavior in the biggest medical university of the country towards collaboration is, i.e. how much do decision makers participate in different stages of research? Which factors affect it? METHODOLOGY: The samples under study were all Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) completed research projects that had gotten grants in 2004 and were over by the time this study was done. Two questionnaires were designed for this study: i) the research checklist which was filled for 301 projects, ii) the researcher's questionnaire, which was sent to principle investigators, 208 of which were collected. Multiple linear regression analysis was used for evaluating the potential factors affecting individuals 'collaboration score'. RESULTS: Only 2.2 percent of TUMS' projects initiated in 2004 have had collaboration as a joint PI or co-investigator from non-academic organizations. The principle investigators mean collaboration score was 2.09, where 6 was the total score. So the collaboration score obtained was 35%. The 'type of research' had significant association with the collaboration score which is shown in the linear regression; collaboration was seen more in clinical (p = 0.007) and health system researches (p = 0.001) as compared to basic research. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that not many individuals collaborated as co-investigators from outside the university. This finding shows that research policy makers need to introduce interventions in this field. And assessment of barriers to collaboration and its facilitating factors should be considered in order to make it actually happen. BioMed Central 2009-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2679006/ /pubmed/19386131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-8 Text en Copyright © 2009 Majdzadeh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Majdzadeh, Reza
Nedjat, Saharnaz
Gholami, Jaleh
Nedjat, Sima
Maleki, Katayoun
Qorbani, Mostafa
Shokoohi, Mostafa
Ashoorkhani, Mahnaz
Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title_full Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title_fullStr Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title_full_unstemmed Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title_short Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: two decades after integration
title_sort research collaboration in tehran university of medical sciences: two decades after integration
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19386131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-8
work_keys_str_mv AT majdzadehreza researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT nedjatsaharnaz researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT gholamijaleh researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT nedjatsima researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT malekikatayoun researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT qorbanimostafa researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT shokoohimostafa researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration
AT ashoorkhanimahnaz researchcollaborationintehranuniversityofmedicalsciencestwodecadesafterintegration