Cargando…

Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be grouped according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. METHODS: In this multinational study, 7713 primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastrointestinal (GI) specialists took part in a st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, A, MacDonald, C, Örn, C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Gut
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01929.x
_version_ 1782166943620399104
author King, A
MacDonald, C
Örn, C
author_facet King, A
MacDonald, C
Örn, C
author_sort King, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be grouped according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. METHODS: In this multinational study, 7713 primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastrointestinal (GI) specialists took part in a structured online survey to determine how they perceive the clinical and psychological needs of their GERD patients, based on their three most recent consultations. Patients were grouped according to one of the five clusters that were subjectively developed based on preceding qualitative research. RESULTS: Findings are reported for 1157 respondents (875 PCPs, 282 GI specialists), who reviewed 3471 patient records. Two of the five original clusters were collapsed because of overlapping characteristics, giving rise to three patient clusters. Patients with ‘long-term, disrupting GERD’ (39%) had symptoms considered to have not only high physical but also psychological impact. Patients with ‘recurrent, distressing GERD’ (14%) experienced both physical and psychological impact and were worried about the recurrent, restrictive nature of their disease or the possibility of having a more serious underlying condition. Patients with ‘inconveniencing GERD’ (48%) had less frequent symptoms with overall lower impact. Overall, there was a trend for GI specialists to more likely see patients at higher clinical need than PCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD can generally be classified according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. Recognition that such patients have different needs may facilitate improved management of GERD by allowing treatment to be tailored according to the patient's need.
format Text
id pubmed-2680331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26803312009-05-15 Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis King, A MacDonald, C Örn, C Int J Clin Pract Gut OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be grouped according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. METHODS: In this multinational study, 7713 primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastrointestinal (GI) specialists took part in a structured online survey to determine how they perceive the clinical and psychological needs of their GERD patients, based on their three most recent consultations. Patients were grouped according to one of the five clusters that were subjectively developed based on preceding qualitative research. RESULTS: Findings are reported for 1157 respondents (875 PCPs, 282 GI specialists), who reviewed 3471 patient records. Two of the five original clusters were collapsed because of overlapping characteristics, giving rise to three patient clusters. Patients with ‘long-term, disrupting GERD’ (39%) had symptoms considered to have not only high physical but also psychological impact. Patients with ‘recurrent, distressing GERD’ (14%) experienced both physical and psychological impact and were worried about the recurrent, restrictive nature of their disease or the possibility of having a more serious underlying condition. Patients with ‘inconveniencing GERD’ (48%) had less frequent symptoms with overall lower impact. Overall, there was a trend for GI specialists to more likely see patients at higher clinical need than PCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD can generally be classified according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. Recognition that such patients have different needs may facilitate improved management of GERD by allowing treatment to be tailored according to the patient's need. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2680331/ /pubmed/19166432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01929.x Text en Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Gut
King, A
MacDonald, C
Örn, C
Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title_full Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title_fullStr Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title_full_unstemmed Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title_short Understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
title_sort understanding gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a patient-cluster analysis
topic Gut
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01929.x
work_keys_str_mv AT kinga understandinggastrooesophagealrefluxdiseaseapatientclusteranalysis
AT macdonaldc understandinggastrooesophagealrefluxdiseaseapatientclusteranalysis
AT ornc understandinggastrooesophagealrefluxdiseaseapatientclusteranalysis