Cargando…

Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View

BACKGROUND: Early deafness leads to enhanced attention in the visual periphery. Yet, whether this enhancement confers advantages in everyday life remains unknown, as deaf individuals have been shown to be more distracted by irrelevant information in the periphery than their hearing peers. Here, we s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dye, Matthew W. G., Hauser, Peter C., Bavelier, Daphne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19462009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005640
_version_ 1782166967573020672
author Dye, Matthew W. G.
Hauser, Peter C.
Bavelier, Daphne
author_facet Dye, Matthew W. G.
Hauser, Peter C.
Bavelier, Daphne
author_sort Dye, Matthew W. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early deafness leads to enhanced attention in the visual periphery. Yet, whether this enhancement confers advantages in everyday life remains unknown, as deaf individuals have been shown to be more distracted by irrelevant information in the periphery than their hearing peers. Here, we show that, in a complex attentional task, a performance advantage results for deaf individuals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We employed the Useful Field of View (UFOV) which requires central target identification concurrent with peripheral target localization in the presence of distractors – a divided, selective attention task. First, the comparison of deaf and hearing adults with or without sign language skills establishes that deafness and not sign language use drives UFOV enhancement. Second, UFOV performance was enhanced in deaf children, but only after 11 years of age. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates that, following early auditory deprivation, visual attention resources toward the periphery slowly get augmented to eventually result in a clear behavioral advantage by pre-adolescence on a selective visual attention task.
format Text
id pubmed-2680667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26806672009-05-20 Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View Dye, Matthew W. G. Hauser, Peter C. Bavelier, Daphne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Early deafness leads to enhanced attention in the visual periphery. Yet, whether this enhancement confers advantages in everyday life remains unknown, as deaf individuals have been shown to be more distracted by irrelevant information in the periphery than their hearing peers. Here, we show that, in a complex attentional task, a performance advantage results for deaf individuals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We employed the Useful Field of View (UFOV) which requires central target identification concurrent with peripheral target localization in the presence of distractors – a divided, selective attention task. First, the comparison of deaf and hearing adults with or without sign language skills establishes that deafness and not sign language use drives UFOV enhancement. Second, UFOV performance was enhanced in deaf children, but only after 11 years of age. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates that, following early auditory deprivation, visual attention resources toward the periphery slowly get augmented to eventually result in a clear behavioral advantage by pre-adolescence on a selective visual attention task. Public Library of Science 2009-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2680667/ /pubmed/19462009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005640 Text en Dye et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dye, Matthew W. G.
Hauser, Peter C.
Bavelier, Daphne
Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title_full Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title_fullStr Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title_full_unstemmed Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title_short Is Visual Selective Attention in Deaf Individuals Enhanced or Deficient? The Case of the Useful Field of View
title_sort is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? the case of the useful field of view
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19462009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005640
work_keys_str_mv AT dyematthewwg isvisualselectiveattentionindeafindividualsenhancedordeficientthecaseoftheusefulfieldofview
AT hauserpeterc isvisualselectiveattentionindeafindividualsenhancedordeficientthecaseoftheusefulfieldofview
AT bavelierdaphne isvisualselectiveattentionindeafindividualsenhancedordeficientthecaseoftheusefulfieldofview