Cargando…

The value of minilaparotomy for total hysterectomy for benign uterine disease: A comparative study with conventional Pfannenstiel and laparoscopic approaches

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to review and compare the results obtained using the Pfannenstiel, laparoscopy and minilaparotomy approaches for total hysterectomy procedure in relation to benign uterine diseases. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed on 165 patients who underwen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royo, Pedro, Alcázar, Juan Luis, García-Manero, Manuel, Olartecoechea, Begoña, López-García, Guillermo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19386113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-11
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to review and compare the results obtained using the Pfannenstiel, laparoscopy and minilaparotomy approaches for total hysterectomy procedure in relation to benign uterine diseases. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed on 165 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases at our centre during the period 2004 to 2006. FINDINGS: The minilaparotomy procedure was the fastest procedure with a mean time of 73.4 minutes (range: 67.85 to 78.94 minutes, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was shortest for laparosopic procedure (mean time: 3.24 days, range: 2.86 to 3.61 days) (p < 0.001). The rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications were not statistical different among three procedures. CONCLUSION: The minilaparotomy procedure offers a minimally invasive option for total hysterectomy due to benign uterine disease.