Cargando…

Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images

BACKGROUND: There are many sources of variation in dual labelled microarray experiments, including data acquisition and image processing. The final interpretation of experiments strongly relies on the accuracy of the measurement of the signal intensity. For low intensity spots in particular, accurat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glatigny, Annie, Delacroix, Hervé, Tang, Thomas, François, Nicolas, Aggerbeck, Lawrence, Mucchielli-Giorgi, Marie-Hélène
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2681461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19331668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-98
_version_ 1782167033308250112
author Glatigny, Annie
Delacroix, Hervé
Tang, Thomas
François, Nicolas
Aggerbeck, Lawrence
Mucchielli-Giorgi, Marie-Hélène
author_facet Glatigny, Annie
Delacroix, Hervé
Tang, Thomas
François, Nicolas
Aggerbeck, Lawrence
Mucchielli-Giorgi, Marie-Hélène
author_sort Glatigny, Annie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many sources of variation in dual labelled microarray experiments, including data acquisition and image processing. The final interpretation of experiments strongly relies on the accuracy of the measurement of the signal intensity. For low intensity spots in particular, accurately estimating gene expression variations remains a challenge as signal measurement is, in this case, highly subject to fluctuations. RESULTS: To evaluate the fluctuations in the fluorescence intensities of spots, we used series of successive scans, at the same settings, of whole genome arrays. We measured the decrease in fluorescence and we evaluated the influence of different parameters (PMT gain, resolution and chemistry of the slide) on the signal variability, at the level of the array as a whole and by intensity interval. Moreover, we assessed the effect of averaging scans on the fluctuations. We found that the extent of photo-bleaching was low and we established that 1) the fluorescence fluctuation is linked to the resolution e.g. it depends on the number of pixels in the spot 2) the fluorescence fluctuation increases as the scanner voltage increases and, moreover, is higher for the red as opposed to the green fluorescence which can introduce bias in the analysis 3) the signal variability is linked to the intensity level, it is higher for low intensities 4) the heterogeneity of the spots and the variability of the signal and the intensity ratios decrease when two or three scans are averaged. CONCLUSION: Protocols consisting of two scans, one at low and one at high PMT gains, or multiple scans (ten scans) can introduce bias or be difficult to implement. We found that averaging two, or at most three, acquisitions of microarrays scanned at moderate photomultiplier settings (PMT gain) is sufficient to significantly improve the accuracy (quality) of the data and particularly those for spots having low intensities and we propose this as a general approach. For averaging and precise image alignment at sub-pixel levels we have made a program freely available on our web-site to facilitate implementation of this approach.
format Text
id pubmed-2681461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26814612009-05-14 Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images Glatigny, Annie Delacroix, Hervé Tang, Thomas François, Nicolas Aggerbeck, Lawrence Mucchielli-Giorgi, Marie-Hélène BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: There are many sources of variation in dual labelled microarray experiments, including data acquisition and image processing. The final interpretation of experiments strongly relies on the accuracy of the measurement of the signal intensity. For low intensity spots in particular, accurately estimating gene expression variations remains a challenge as signal measurement is, in this case, highly subject to fluctuations. RESULTS: To evaluate the fluctuations in the fluorescence intensities of spots, we used series of successive scans, at the same settings, of whole genome arrays. We measured the decrease in fluorescence and we evaluated the influence of different parameters (PMT gain, resolution and chemistry of the slide) on the signal variability, at the level of the array as a whole and by intensity interval. Moreover, we assessed the effect of averaging scans on the fluctuations. We found that the extent of photo-bleaching was low and we established that 1) the fluorescence fluctuation is linked to the resolution e.g. it depends on the number of pixels in the spot 2) the fluorescence fluctuation increases as the scanner voltage increases and, moreover, is higher for the red as opposed to the green fluorescence which can introduce bias in the analysis 3) the signal variability is linked to the intensity level, it is higher for low intensities 4) the heterogeneity of the spots and the variability of the signal and the intensity ratios decrease when two or three scans are averaged. CONCLUSION: Protocols consisting of two scans, one at low and one at high PMT gains, or multiple scans (ten scans) can introduce bias or be difficult to implement. We found that averaging two, or at most three, acquisitions of microarrays scanned at moderate photomultiplier settings (PMT gain) is sufficient to significantly improve the accuracy (quality) of the data and particularly those for spots having low intensities and we propose this as a general approach. For averaging and precise image alignment at sub-pixel levels we have made a program freely available on our web-site to facilitate implementation of this approach. BioMed Central 2009-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2681461/ /pubmed/19331668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-98 Text en Copyright © 2009 Glatigny et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Glatigny, Annie
Delacroix, Hervé
Tang, Thomas
François, Nicolas
Aggerbeck, Lawrence
Mucchielli-Giorgi, Marie-Hélène
Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title_full Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title_fullStr Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title_full_unstemmed Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title_short Characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
title_sort characterisation and correction of signal fluctuations in successive acquisitions of microarray images
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2681461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19331668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-98
work_keys_str_mv AT glatignyannie characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages
AT delacroixherve characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages
AT tangthomas characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages
AT francoisnicolas characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages
AT aggerbecklawrence characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages
AT mucchielligiorgimariehelene characterisationandcorrectionofsignalfluctuationsinsuccessiveacquisitionsofmicroarrayimages