Cargando…

Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis

Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laloë, Denis, Jombart, Thibaut, Dufour, Anne-Béatrice, Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545
_version_ 1782167094862807040
author Laloë, Denis
Jombart, Thibaut
Dufour, Anne-Béatrice
Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun
author_facet Laloë, Denis
Jombart, Thibaut
Dufour, Anne-Béatrice
Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun
author_sort Laloë, Denis
collection PubMed
description Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were performed using a version of principal component analysis, which is designed for allelic frequencies (%PCA). Drawing confidence ellipses around the population positions enhances %PCA plots. Second, a multiple co-inertia analysis (MCOA) was performed, which reveals the common features of single-marker analyses, builds a reference structure and makes it possible to compare single-marker structures with this reference through graphical tools. Finally, a typological value is provided for each marker. The typological value measures the efficiency of a marker to structure populations in the same way as other markers. In this study, we evaluate the interest and the efficiency of this method applied to a European and African bovine microsatellite data set. The typological value differs among markers, indicating that some markers are more efficient in displaying a consensus typology than others. Moreover, efficient markers in one collection of populations do not remain efficient in others. The number of markers used in a study is not a sufficient criterion to judge its reliability. "Quantity is not quality".
format Text
id pubmed-2682805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26828052009-05-16 Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis Laloë, Denis Jombart, Thibaut Dufour, Anne-Béatrice Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun Genet Sel Evol Research Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were performed using a version of principal component analysis, which is designed for allelic frequencies (%PCA). Drawing confidence ellipses around the population positions enhances %PCA plots. Second, a multiple co-inertia analysis (MCOA) was performed, which reveals the common features of single-marker analyses, builds a reference structure and makes it possible to compare single-marker structures with this reference through graphical tools. Finally, a typological value is provided for each marker. The typological value measures the efficiency of a marker to structure populations in the same way as other markers. In this study, we evaluate the interest and the efficiency of this method applied to a European and African bovine microsatellite data set. The typological value differs among markers, indicating that some markers are more efficient in displaying a consensus typology than others. Moreover, efficient markers in one collection of populations do not remain efficient in others. The number of markers used in a study is not a sufficient criterion to judge its reliability. "Quantity is not quality". BioMed Central 2007-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2682805/ /pubmed/17897596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545 Text en Copyright © 2007 INRA, EDP Sciences
spellingShingle Research
Laloë, Denis
Jombart, Thibaut
Dufour, Anne-Béatrice
Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun
Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title_full Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title_fullStr Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title_full_unstemmed Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title_short Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
title_sort consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545
work_keys_str_mv AT laloedenis consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis
AT jombartthibaut consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis
AT dufourannebeatrice consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis
AT moazamigoudarzikatayoun consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis