Cargando…
Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis
Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were pe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545 |
_version_ | 1782167094862807040 |
---|---|
author | Laloë, Denis Jombart, Thibaut Dufour, Anne-Béatrice Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun |
author_facet | Laloë, Denis Jombart, Thibaut Dufour, Anne-Béatrice Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun |
author_sort | Laloë, Denis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were performed using a version of principal component analysis, which is designed for allelic frequencies (%PCA). Drawing confidence ellipses around the population positions enhances %PCA plots. Second, a multiple co-inertia analysis (MCOA) was performed, which reveals the common features of single-marker analyses, builds a reference structure and makes it possible to compare single-marker structures with this reference through graphical tools. Finally, a typological value is provided for each marker. The typological value measures the efficiency of a marker to structure populations in the same way as other markers. In this study, we evaluate the interest and the efficiency of this method applied to a European and African bovine microsatellite data set. The typological value differs among markers, indicating that some markers are more efficient in displaying a consensus typology than others. Moreover, efficient markers in one collection of populations do not remain efficient in others. The number of markers used in a study is not a sufficient criterion to judge its reliability. "Quantity is not quality". |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2682805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26828052009-05-16 Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis Laloë, Denis Jombart, Thibaut Dufour, Anne-Béatrice Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun Genet Sel Evol Research Working with weakly congruent markers means that consensus genetic structuring of populations requires methods explicitly devoted to this purpose. The method, which is presented here, belongs to the multivariate analyses. This method consists of different steps. First, single-marker analyses were performed using a version of principal component analysis, which is designed for allelic frequencies (%PCA). Drawing confidence ellipses around the population positions enhances %PCA plots. Second, a multiple co-inertia analysis (MCOA) was performed, which reveals the common features of single-marker analyses, builds a reference structure and makes it possible to compare single-marker structures with this reference through graphical tools. Finally, a typological value is provided for each marker. The typological value measures the efficiency of a marker to structure populations in the same way as other markers. In this study, we evaluate the interest and the efficiency of this method applied to a European and African bovine microsatellite data set. The typological value differs among markers, indicating that some markers are more efficient in displaying a consensus typology than others. Moreover, efficient markers in one collection of populations do not remain efficient in others. The number of markers used in a study is not a sufficient criterion to judge its reliability. "Quantity is not quality". BioMed Central 2007-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2682805/ /pubmed/17897596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545 Text en Copyright © 2007 INRA, EDP Sciences |
spellingShingle | Research Laloë, Denis Jombart, Thibaut Dufour, Anne-Béatrice Moazami-Goudarzi, Katayoun Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title | Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title_full | Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title_fullStr | Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title_short | Consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
title_sort | consensus genetic structuring and typological value of markers using multiple co-inertia analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-39-5-545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laloedenis consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis AT jombartthibaut consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis AT dufourannebeatrice consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis AT moazamigoudarzikatayoun consensusgeneticstructuringandtypologicalvalueofmarkersusingmultiplecoinertiaanalysis |