Cargando…

Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective

The introduction of reduced and more powerful electronics has allowed the transition of medical equipment such as respiratory support devices from the hospital to the patient’s home environment. Even if this move could be beneficial for the patient, the clinician ends up in a delicate situation wher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evers, Gerard, Loey, Carl Van
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19452035
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010017
_version_ 1782167105075937280
author Evers, Gerard
Loey, Carl Van
author_facet Evers, Gerard
Loey, Carl Van
author_sort Evers, Gerard
collection PubMed
description The introduction of reduced and more powerful electronics has allowed the transition of medical equipment such as respiratory support devices from the hospital to the patient’s home environment. Even if this move could be beneficial for the patient, the clinician ends up in a delicate situation where little or no direct supervision is possible on the delivered treatment. Progress in technologies led to an improved handling of patient-device interaction: manufacturers are promoting new or improved ventilation modes or cycling techniques for better patient-ventilator coupling. Even though these ventilation modes have become more responsive to patient efforts, adversely they might lead to events such as false triggering, autotriggering, delayed triggering. In addition, manufacturers are developing tools to enhance the follow-up, remotely or offline, of the treatment by using embedded memory in the respiratory devices. This logging might be beneficial for the caregiver to review and document the treatment and tune the settings to the patient’s need and comfort. Also, remote telemedicine has been raised as a potential solution for many years without yet overall acceptance due to legal, technical and ethical problems. Benefits of new technologies in respiratory support devices give the technical foundation for the transition from hospital to home and reducing patient/ventilator asynchronies. Healthcare infrastructure has to follow this trend in terms of cost savings versus hospital stays.
format Text
id pubmed-2682925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26829252009-05-18 Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective Evers, Gerard Loey, Carl Van Open Respir Med J Article The introduction of reduced and more powerful electronics has allowed the transition of medical equipment such as respiratory support devices from the hospital to the patient’s home environment. Even if this move could be beneficial for the patient, the clinician ends up in a delicate situation where little or no direct supervision is possible on the delivered treatment. Progress in technologies led to an improved handling of patient-device interaction: manufacturers are promoting new or improved ventilation modes or cycling techniques for better patient-ventilator coupling. Even though these ventilation modes have become more responsive to patient efforts, adversely they might lead to events such as false triggering, autotriggering, delayed triggering. In addition, manufacturers are developing tools to enhance the follow-up, remotely or offline, of the treatment by using embedded memory in the respiratory devices. This logging might be beneficial for the caregiver to review and document the treatment and tune the settings to the patient’s need and comfort. Also, remote telemedicine has been raised as a potential solution for many years without yet overall acceptance due to legal, technical and ethical problems. Benefits of new technologies in respiratory support devices give the technical foundation for the transition from hospital to home and reducing patient/ventilator asynchronies. Healthcare infrastructure has to follow this trend in terms of cost savings versus hospital stays. Bentham Open 2009-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2682925/ /pubmed/19452035 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010017 Text en © Evers and Loey; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Evers, Gerard
Loey, Carl Van
Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title_full Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title_fullStr Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title_short Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer’s Perspective
title_sort monitoring patient/ventilator interactions: manufacturer’s perspective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19452035
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874306400903010017
work_keys_str_mv AT eversgerard monitoringpatientventilatorinteractionsmanufacturersperspective
AT loeycarlvan monitoringpatientventilatorinteractionsmanufacturersperspective