Cargando…

Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?

BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godino, Cosmo, Mendolicchio, Loredana, Figini, Filippo, Latib, Azeem, Sharp, Andrew SP, Cosgrave, John, Calori, Giliola, Cera, Michela, Chieffo, Alaide, Castelli, Alfredo, Maseri, Attilio, Ruggeri, Zaverio M, Colombo, Antonio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4
_version_ 1782167137789411328
author Godino, Cosmo
Mendolicchio, Loredana
Figini, Filippo
Latib, Azeem
Sharp, Andrew SP
Cosgrave, John
Calori, Giliola
Cera, Michela
Chieffo, Alaide
Castelli, Alfredo
Maseri, Attilio
Ruggeri, Zaverio M
Colombo, Antonio
author_facet Godino, Cosmo
Mendolicchio, Loredana
Figini, Filippo
Latib, Azeem
Sharp, Andrew SP
Cosgrave, John
Calori, Giliola
Cera, Michela
Chieffo, Alaide
Castelli, Alfredo
Maseri, Attilio
Ruggeri, Zaverio M
Colombo, Antonio
author_sort Godino, Cosmo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. METHODS: We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E(1); 2) VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y(12)-Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). RESULTS: Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E(1 )was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4–33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7–9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1(st )quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98, p < 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72–0.93, p < 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR.
format Text
id pubmed-2683811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26838112009-05-19 Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio Thromb J Original Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. METHODS: We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E(1); 2) VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y(12)-Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). RESULTS: Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E(1 )was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4–33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7–9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1(st )quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98, p < 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72–0.93, p < 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR. BioMed Central 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2683811/ /pubmed/19419580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4 Text en Copyright © 2009 Godino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Investigation
Godino, Cosmo
Mendolicchio, Loredana
Figini, Filippo
Latib, Azeem
Sharp, Andrew SP
Cosgrave, John
Calori, Giliola
Cera, Michela
Chieffo, Alaide
Castelli, Alfredo
Maseri, Attilio
Ruggeri, Zaverio M
Colombo, Antonio
Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title_full Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title_fullStr Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title_short Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
title_sort comparison of verifynow-p2y(12 )test and flow cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. what is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
topic Original Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4
work_keys_str_mv AT godinocosmo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT mendolicchioloredana comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT figinifilippo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT latibazeem comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT sharpandrewsp comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT cosgravejohn comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT calorigiliola comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT ceramichela comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT chieffoalaide comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT castellialfredo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT maseriattilio comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT ruggerizaveriom comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy
AT colomboantonio comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy