Cargando…
Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4 |
_version_ | 1782167137789411328 |
---|---|
author | Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio |
author_facet | Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio |
author_sort | Godino, Cosmo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. METHODS: We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E(1); 2) VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y(12)-Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). RESULTS: Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E(1 )was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4–33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7–9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1(st )quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98, p < 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72–0.93, p < 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2683811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26838112009-05-19 Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio Thromb J Original Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. METHODS: We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E(1); 2) VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y(12)-Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). RESULTS: Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E(1 )was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4–33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7–9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1(st )quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98, p < 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72–0.93, p < 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR. BioMed Central 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2683811/ /pubmed/19419580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4 Text en Copyright © 2009 Godino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Investigation Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title_full | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title_fullStr | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title_short | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y(12 )test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
title_sort | comparison of verifynow-p2y(12 )test and flow cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. what is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
topic | Original Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT godinocosmo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT mendolicchioloredana comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT figinifilippo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT latibazeem comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT sharpandrewsp comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT cosgravejohn comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT calorigiliola comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT ceramichela comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT chieffoalaide comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT castellialfredo comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT maseriattilio comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT ruggerizaveriom comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy AT colomboantonio comparisonofverifynowp2y12testandflowcytometryformonitoringindividualplateletresponsetoclopidogrelwhatisthecutoffvalueforidentifyingpatientswhoarelowresponderstoclopidogreltherapy |