Cargando…

Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume

BACKGROUND: Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) has been shown to be an independent predictor of coronary artery disease. To date its assessment has been restricted to the use of surrogate echocardiographic indices such as measurement of epicardial fat thickness over the right ventricular free wall, wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Adam J, Worthley, Matthew I, Psaltis, Peter J, Carbone, Angelo, Dundon, Benjamin K, Duncan, Rae F, Piantadosi, Cynthia, Lau, Dennis H, Sanders, Prashanthan, Wittert, Gary A, Worthley, Stephen G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19416534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-15
_version_ 1782167168662634496
author Nelson, Adam J
Worthley, Matthew I
Psaltis, Peter J
Carbone, Angelo
Dundon, Benjamin K
Duncan, Rae F
Piantadosi, Cynthia
Lau, Dennis H
Sanders, Prashanthan
Wittert, Gary A
Worthley, Stephen G
author_facet Nelson, Adam J
Worthley, Matthew I
Psaltis, Peter J
Carbone, Angelo
Dundon, Benjamin K
Duncan, Rae F
Piantadosi, Cynthia
Lau, Dennis H
Sanders, Prashanthan
Wittert, Gary A
Worthley, Stephen G
author_sort Nelson, Adam J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) has been shown to be an independent predictor of coronary artery disease. To date its assessment has been restricted to the use of surrogate echocardiographic indices such as measurement of epicardial fat thickness over the right ventricular free wall, which have limitations. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers the potential to non-invasively assess total PAT, however like other imaging modalities, CMR has not yet been validated for this purpose. Thus, we sought to describe a novel technique for assessing total PAT with validation in an ovine model. METHODS: 11 merino sheep were studied. A standard clinical series of ventricular short axis CMR images (1.5T Siemens Sonata) were obtained during mechanical ventilation breath-holds. Beginning at the mitral annulus, consecutive end-diastolic ventricular images were used to determine the area and volume of epicardial, paracardial and pericardial adipose tissue. In addition adipose thickness was measured at the right ventricular free wall. Following euthanasia, the paracardial adipose tissue was removed from the ventricle and weighed to allow comparison with corresponding CMR measurements. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between CMR-derived paracardial adipose tissue volume and ex vivo paracardial mass (R(2 )= 0.89, p < 0.001). In contrast, CMR measurements of corresponding RV free wall paracardial adipose thickness did not correlate with ex vivo paracardial mass (R(2 )= 0.003, p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: In this ovine model, CMR-derived paracardial adipose tissue volume, but not the corresponding and conventional measure of paracardial adipose thickness over the RV free wall, accurately reflected paracardial adipose tissue mass. This study validates for the first time, the use of clinically utilised CMR sequences for the accurate and reproducible assessment of pericardial adiposity. Furthermore this non-invasive modality does not use ionising radiation and therefore is ideally suited for future studies of PAT and its role in cardiovascular risk prediction and disease in clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2684106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26841062009-05-20 Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume Nelson, Adam J Worthley, Matthew I Psaltis, Peter J Carbone, Angelo Dundon, Benjamin K Duncan, Rae F Piantadosi, Cynthia Lau, Dennis H Sanders, Prashanthan Wittert, Gary A Worthley, Stephen G J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) has been shown to be an independent predictor of coronary artery disease. To date its assessment has been restricted to the use of surrogate echocardiographic indices such as measurement of epicardial fat thickness over the right ventricular free wall, which have limitations. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers the potential to non-invasively assess total PAT, however like other imaging modalities, CMR has not yet been validated for this purpose. Thus, we sought to describe a novel technique for assessing total PAT with validation in an ovine model. METHODS: 11 merino sheep were studied. A standard clinical series of ventricular short axis CMR images (1.5T Siemens Sonata) were obtained during mechanical ventilation breath-holds. Beginning at the mitral annulus, consecutive end-diastolic ventricular images were used to determine the area and volume of epicardial, paracardial and pericardial adipose tissue. In addition adipose thickness was measured at the right ventricular free wall. Following euthanasia, the paracardial adipose tissue was removed from the ventricle and weighed to allow comparison with corresponding CMR measurements. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between CMR-derived paracardial adipose tissue volume and ex vivo paracardial mass (R(2 )= 0.89, p < 0.001). In contrast, CMR measurements of corresponding RV free wall paracardial adipose thickness did not correlate with ex vivo paracardial mass (R(2 )= 0.003, p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: In this ovine model, CMR-derived paracardial adipose tissue volume, but not the corresponding and conventional measure of paracardial adipose thickness over the RV free wall, accurately reflected paracardial adipose tissue mass. This study validates for the first time, the use of clinically utilised CMR sequences for the accurate and reproducible assessment of pericardial adiposity. Furthermore this non-invasive modality does not use ionising radiation and therefore is ideally suited for future studies of PAT and its role in cardiovascular risk prediction and disease in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2009-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2684106/ /pubmed/19416534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-15 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nelson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nelson, Adam J
Worthley, Matthew I
Psaltis, Peter J
Carbone, Angelo
Dundon, Benjamin K
Duncan, Rae F
Piantadosi, Cynthia
Lau, Dennis H
Sanders, Prashanthan
Wittert, Gary A
Worthley, Stephen G
Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title_full Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title_fullStr Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title_full_unstemmed Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title_short Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
title_sort validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pericardial adipose tissue volume
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19416534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-15
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonadamj validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT worthleymatthewi validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT psaltispeterj validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT carboneangelo validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT dundonbenjamink validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT duncanraef validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT piantadosicynthia validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT laudennish validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT sandersprashanthan validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT wittertgarya validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume
AT worthleystepheng validationofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceassessmentofpericardialadiposetissuevolume