Cargando…

Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma

AIM: Our aim was to review the current literature describing the endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of published, peer-reviewed articles relating the primary ureteroscopic or percutaneous management of upper tract TCC was performed u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwaszko, Markian R., Krambeck, Amy E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468390
_version_ 1782167192946606080
author Iwaszko, Markian R.
Krambeck, Amy E.
author_facet Iwaszko, Markian R.
Krambeck, Amy E.
author_sort Iwaszko, Markian R.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Our aim was to review the current literature describing the endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of published, peer-reviewed articles relating the primary ureteroscopic or percutaneous management of upper tract TCC was performed using the MEDLINE database. RESULTS: Historically, the gold-standard management for upper tract TCC consists of nephroureterectomy with excision of a bladder cuff. The employment of endoscopic management with these neoplasms was initially instituted in individuals with imperative indications, including bilateral disease, solitary kidney, and/or renal insufficiency. For individuals treated with ureteroscopy, recurrence rates range from 30 to 71% and cancer-specific survival rates from 50 to 93%. Results are dependent primarily on tumor grade and stage. In individuals with low-stage, low-grade tumors treated percutaneously, recurrence rates, and cancer-specific survival rates are 18-33% and 94-100%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy has been employed with thiotepa, mitomycin, and BCG, but none have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in recurrence or cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management is a safe and effective treatment alternative to nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract TCC. Survival outcomes are comparable, but renal preservation therapy offers the advantage of reduced morbidity, complications, and the potential for better quality of life. Recurrence and disease progression are not uncommon and underscore the need for strict tumor surveillance.
format Text
id pubmed-2684264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26842642009-05-22 Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma Iwaszko, Markian R. Krambeck, Amy E. Indian J Urol Review Article AIM: Our aim was to review the current literature describing the endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of published, peer-reviewed articles relating the primary ureteroscopic or percutaneous management of upper tract TCC was performed using the MEDLINE database. RESULTS: Historically, the gold-standard management for upper tract TCC consists of nephroureterectomy with excision of a bladder cuff. The employment of endoscopic management with these neoplasms was initially instituted in individuals with imperative indications, including bilateral disease, solitary kidney, and/or renal insufficiency. For individuals treated with ureteroscopy, recurrence rates range from 30 to 71% and cancer-specific survival rates from 50 to 93%. Results are dependent primarily on tumor grade and stage. In individuals with low-stage, low-grade tumors treated percutaneously, recurrence rates, and cancer-specific survival rates are 18-33% and 94-100%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy has been employed with thiotepa, mitomycin, and BCG, but none have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in recurrence or cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management is a safe and effective treatment alternative to nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract TCC. Survival outcomes are comparable, but renal preservation therapy offers the advantage of reduced morbidity, complications, and the potential for better quality of life. Recurrence and disease progression are not uncommon and underscore the need for strict tumor surveillance. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2684264/ /pubmed/19468390 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Iwaszko, Markian R.
Krambeck, Amy E.
Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title_full Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title_short Conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
title_sort conservative management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468390
work_keys_str_mv AT iwaszkomarkianr conservativemanagementofuppertracttransitionalcellcarcinoma
AT krambeckamye conservativemanagementofuppertracttransitionalcellcarcinoma