Cargando…

Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the postoperative morbidity of closure versus non closure of the buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site. METHODS: Patients who underwent BMG harvest for urethroplasty were randomized into 2 groups; in group 1 donor site was closed and in group 2 it was left open....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muruganandam, K., Dubey, Deepak, Gulia, Anil Kumar, Mandhani, Anil, Srivastava, Aneesh, Kapoor, Rakesh, Kumar, Anant
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468433
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.45541
_version_ 1782167206674563072
author Muruganandam, K.
Dubey, Deepak
Gulia, Anil Kumar
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kapoor, Rakesh
Kumar, Anant
author_facet Muruganandam, K.
Dubey, Deepak
Gulia, Anil Kumar
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kapoor, Rakesh
Kumar, Anant
author_sort Muruganandam, K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the postoperative morbidity of closure versus non closure of the buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site. METHODS: Patients who underwent BMG harvest for urethroplasty were randomized into 2 groups; in group 1 donor site was closed and in group 2 it was left open. Self made questionnaires were used to assess post-operative pain, limitation to mouth opening, loss of sensation at graft site. The time to resumption of liquid and solid diet were also noted. RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied, 25 in each group from July 2003 to July 2005. BMG was harvested from single cheek in most of the patients. Mean post operative pain score was 4.20 and 3.08 at day 1 in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P < 0.05). Return to oral intake in terms of liquid and solid diet was comparable between the groups. Difficulty with mouth opening was maximal during the first week with no difference among the two groups. Two patients in group 1 and one in group 2 had persistent peri-oral numbness at 6 months. None of the patients in both the groups had changes in salivation or retention cysts. CONCLUSION: Pain appears to be worse in the immediate post operative period with suturing of the harvest site. There is no difference in long term morbidity whether the graft site is closed or left open. It may be best to leave buccal mucosa harvest sites unsutured.
format Text
id pubmed-2684322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26843222009-05-22 Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity Muruganandam, K. Dubey, Deepak Gulia, Anil Kumar Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kapoor, Rakesh Kumar, Anant Indian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the postoperative morbidity of closure versus non closure of the buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site. METHODS: Patients who underwent BMG harvest for urethroplasty were randomized into 2 groups; in group 1 donor site was closed and in group 2 it was left open. Self made questionnaires were used to assess post-operative pain, limitation to mouth opening, loss of sensation at graft site. The time to resumption of liquid and solid diet were also noted. RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied, 25 in each group from July 2003 to July 2005. BMG was harvested from single cheek in most of the patients. Mean post operative pain score was 4.20 and 3.08 at day 1 in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P < 0.05). Return to oral intake in terms of liquid and solid diet was comparable between the groups. Difficulty with mouth opening was maximal during the first week with no difference among the two groups. Two patients in group 1 and one in group 2 had persistent peri-oral numbness at 6 months. None of the patients in both the groups had changes in salivation or retention cysts. CONCLUSION: Pain appears to be worse in the immediate post operative period with suturing of the harvest site. There is no difference in long term morbidity whether the graft site is closed or left open. It may be best to leave buccal mucosa harvest sites unsutured. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2684322/ /pubmed/19468433 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.45541 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Muruganandam, K.
Dubey, Deepak
Gulia, Anil Kumar
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kapoor, Rakesh
Kumar, Anant
Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title_full Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title_fullStr Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title_full_unstemmed Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title_short Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: A prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
title_sort closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: a prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468433
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.45541
work_keys_str_mv AT muruganandamk closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT dubeydeepak closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT guliaanilkumar closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT mandhanianil closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT srivastavaaneesh closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT kapoorrakesh closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity
AT kumaranant closureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestsiteaprospectiverandomizedstudyonpostoperativemorbidity