Cargando…

Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions

OBJECTIVES: 1) To study the risk factor profiles of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among adolescent girls, housewives and working women and its socioeconomic and quality of life losses. 2) To undertake risk factor modifications using the adolescent girls. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta, Ahmed, Syed Meraj, Nandagiri, Sujatha, Tadisetty, Swati
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468505
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44256
_version_ 1782167222130573312
author Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta
Ahmed, Syed Meraj
Nandagiri, Sujatha
Tadisetty, Swati
author_facet Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta
Ahmed, Syed Meraj
Nandagiri, Sujatha
Tadisetty, Swati
author_sort Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: 1) To study the risk factor profiles of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among adolescent girls, housewives and working women and its socioeconomic and quality of life losses. 2) To undertake risk factor modifications using the adolescent girls. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional descriptive study followed by educational intervention. STATISTICAL METHODS: Cluster sampling, Proportions, confidence intervals, Chi square and t-Tests and Logistic regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: House to house survey was done in two villages and one urban ward. Seventy-five housewives, 75 working women and 180 adolescent girls were asked about the risk factors and losses due to LUTS. Three teams of adolescent girls were utilized to bring about behavioral modifications. Impact was measured through user perspectives obtained from the participants. RESULTS: Risk factors, social, economic and quality of life losses were different among the three female populations. Overall prevalence of LUTS among the three groups is 61(18.5%). Improper anal washing technique, malnutrition, presence of vaginal discharge, use of unsanitary menstrual pads, pinworm infestation and use of bad toilets were the significant causes among girls. Presence of sexually transmitted diseases was a contributing factor among housewives and working women. Prolonged sitting the posture was also contributing to LUTS among working women. Seventy-four per cent of beneficiaries expressed that intervention is useful. CONCLUSIONS: The causes for LUTS and their consequences were differing among the three female subpopulations. Specific group level interventions using trained girls were successful.
format Text
id pubmed-2684399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26843992009-05-22 Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta Ahmed, Syed Meraj Nandagiri, Sujatha Tadisetty, Swati Indian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: 1) To study the risk factor profiles of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among adolescent girls, housewives and working women and its socioeconomic and quality of life losses. 2) To undertake risk factor modifications using the adolescent girls. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional descriptive study followed by educational intervention. STATISTICAL METHODS: Cluster sampling, Proportions, confidence intervals, Chi square and t-Tests and Logistic regression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: House to house survey was done in two villages and one urban ward. Seventy-five housewives, 75 working women and 180 adolescent girls were asked about the risk factors and losses due to LUTS. Three teams of adolescent girls were utilized to bring about behavioral modifications. Impact was measured through user perspectives obtained from the participants. RESULTS: Risk factors, social, economic and quality of life losses were different among the three female populations. Overall prevalence of LUTS among the three groups is 61(18.5%). Improper anal washing technique, malnutrition, presence of vaginal discharge, use of unsanitary menstrual pads, pinworm infestation and use of bad toilets were the significant causes among girls. Presence of sexually transmitted diseases was a contributing factor among housewives and working women. Prolonged sitting the posture was also contributing to LUTS among working women. Seventy-four per cent of beneficiaries expressed that intervention is useful. CONCLUSIONS: The causes for LUTS and their consequences were differing among the three female subpopulations. Specific group level interventions using trained girls were successful. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2684399/ /pubmed/19468505 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44256 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Avasarala, Kameswararao Atchuta
Ahmed, Syed Meraj
Nandagiri, Sujatha
Tadisetty, Swati
Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title_full Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title_fullStr Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title_short Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
title_sort epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468505
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44256
work_keys_str_mv AT avasaralakameswararaoatchuta epidemiologicaldifferencesoflowerurinarytractsymptomsamongfemalesubpopulationsandgrouplevelinterventions
AT ahmedsyedmeraj epidemiologicaldifferencesoflowerurinarytractsymptomsamongfemalesubpopulationsandgrouplevelinterventions
AT nandagirisujatha epidemiologicaldifferencesoflowerurinarytractsymptomsamongfemalesubpopulationsandgrouplevelinterventions
AT tadisettyswati epidemiologicaldifferencesoflowerurinarytractsymptomsamongfemalesubpopulationsandgrouplevelinterventions