Cargando…

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter

OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been an increasing interest in the application of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for managing renal calculi. In this review we discuss its application for the management of lower calyceal (LC) stones less than 10 mm in maximum dimension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468515
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44265
_version_ 1782167225888669696
author Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra
author_facet Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra
author_sort Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been an increasing interest in the application of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for managing renal calculi. In this review we discuss its application for the management of lower calyceal (LC) stones less than 10 mm in maximum dimension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature was reviewed to summarize the technical development in flexible ureterorenoscopy and its accessories. Further, the indications, outcome and limitations of RIRS for LC calculi < 1 cm were reviewed. RESULTS: Use of access sheath and displacement of LC stone to a more favorable location is increasingly employed during RIRS. Patients who are anticoagulated or obese; those with adverse stone composition and those with concomitant ureteral calculi are ideally suited for RIRS. It is used as a salvage therapy for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) refractory calculi but with a lower success rate (46-62%). It is also increasingly being used as a primary modality for treating LC calculi, with a stone-free rate ranging from 50-90.9%. However, the criteria for defining stone-free status are not uniform in the literature. The impact of intrarenal anatomy on stone-free rates after RIRS is unclear; however, unfavorable lower calyceal anatomy may hamper the efficacy of the procedure. The durability of flexible ureteroscopes remains an important issue. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS continues to undergo significant advancements and is emerging as a first-line procedure for challenging stone cases. The treatment of choice for LC calculi < 1 cm depends on patient's preference and the individual surgeon's preference and level of expertise.
format Text
id pubmed-2684415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26844152009-05-22 Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra Indian J Urol Symposium OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been an increasing interest in the application of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for managing renal calculi. In this review we discuss its application for the management of lower calyceal (LC) stones less than 10 mm in maximum dimension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature was reviewed to summarize the technical development in flexible ureterorenoscopy and its accessories. Further, the indications, outcome and limitations of RIRS for LC calculi < 1 cm were reviewed. RESULTS: Use of access sheath and displacement of LC stone to a more favorable location is increasingly employed during RIRS. Patients who are anticoagulated or obese; those with adverse stone composition and those with concomitant ureteral calculi are ideally suited for RIRS. It is used as a salvage therapy for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) refractory calculi but with a lower success rate (46-62%). It is also increasingly being used as a primary modality for treating LC calculi, with a stone-free rate ranging from 50-90.9%. However, the criteria for defining stone-free status are not uniform in the literature. The impact of intrarenal anatomy on stone-free rates after RIRS is unclear; however, unfavorable lower calyceal anatomy may hamper the efficacy of the procedure. The durability of flexible ureteroscopes remains an important issue. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS continues to undergo significant advancements and is emerging as a first-line procedure for challenging stone cases. The treatment of choice for LC calculi < 1 cm depends on patient's preference and the individual surgeon's preference and level of expertise. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2684415/ /pubmed/19468515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44265 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium
Shah, Hemendra Navinchandra
Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title_full Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title_fullStr Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title_full_unstemmed Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title_short Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
title_sort retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter
topic Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468515
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.44265
work_keys_str_mv AT shahhemendranavinchandra retrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforlowerpolerenalcalculismallerthanonecentimeter