Cargando…
Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221 |
_version_ | 1782167292889530368 |
---|---|
author | Kong, Xiangduo Mohanty, Samarendra K. Stephens, Jared Heale, Jason T. Gomez-Godinez, Veronica Shi, Linda Z. Kim, Jong-Soo Yokomori, Kyoko Berns, Michael W. |
author_facet | Kong, Xiangduo Mohanty, Samarendra K. Stephens, Jared Heale, Jason T. Gomez-Godinez, Veronica Shi, Linda Z. Kim, Jong-Soo Yokomori, Kyoko Berns, Michael W. |
author_sort | Kong, Xiangduo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technology to effectively analyze the in vivo DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage recognition process in mammalian cells. However, the damage-inducing characteristics of the different laser systems have not been fully investigated. Here we compare the nanosecond nitrogen 337 nm UVA laser with and without bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the nanosecond and picosecond 532 nm green second-harmonic Nd:YAG, and the femtosecond NIR 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser with regard to the type(s) of damage and corresponding cellular responses. Crosslinking damage (without significant nucleotide excision repair factor recruitment) and single-strand breaks (with corresponding repair factor recruitment) were common among all three wavelengths. Interestingly, UVA without BrdU uniquely produced base damage and aberrant DSB responses. Furthermore, the total energy required for the threshold H2AX phosphorylation induction was found to vary between the individual laser systems. The results indicate the involvement of different damage mechanisms dictated by wavelength and pulse duration. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2685111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26851112009-05-21 Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells Kong, Xiangduo Mohanty, Samarendra K. Stephens, Jared Heale, Jason T. Gomez-Godinez, Veronica Shi, Linda Z. Kim, Jong-Soo Yokomori, Kyoko Berns, Michael W. Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technology to effectively analyze the in vivo DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage recognition process in mammalian cells. However, the damage-inducing characteristics of the different laser systems have not been fully investigated. Here we compare the nanosecond nitrogen 337 nm UVA laser with and without bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the nanosecond and picosecond 532 nm green second-harmonic Nd:YAG, and the femtosecond NIR 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser with regard to the type(s) of damage and corresponding cellular responses. Crosslinking damage (without significant nucleotide excision repair factor recruitment) and single-strand breaks (with corresponding repair factor recruitment) were common among all three wavelengths. Interestingly, UVA without BrdU uniquely produced base damage and aberrant DSB responses. Furthermore, the total energy required for the threshold H2AX phosphorylation induction was found to vary between the individual laser systems. The results indicate the involvement of different damage mechanisms dictated by wavelength and pulse duration. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed. Oxford University Press 2009-05 2009-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2685111/ /pubmed/19357094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Kong, Xiangduo Mohanty, Samarendra K. Stephens, Jared Heale, Jason T. Gomez-Godinez, Veronica Shi, Linda Z. Kim, Jong-Soo Yokomori, Kyoko Berns, Michael W. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title | Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title_full | Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title_short | Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells |
title_sort | comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to dna damage in mammalian cells |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kongxiangduo comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT mohantysamarendrak comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT stephensjared comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT healejasont comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT gomezgodinezveronica comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT shilindaz comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT kimjongsoo comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT yokomorikyoko comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells AT bernsmichaelw comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells |