Cargando…

Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells

Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Xiangduo, Mohanty, Samarendra K., Stephens, Jared, Heale, Jason T., Gomez-Godinez, Veronica, Shi, Linda Z., Kim, Jong-Soo, Yokomori, Kyoko, Berns, Michael W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221
_version_ 1782167292889530368
author Kong, Xiangduo
Mohanty, Samarendra K.
Stephens, Jared
Heale, Jason T.
Gomez-Godinez, Veronica
Shi, Linda Z.
Kim, Jong-Soo
Yokomori, Kyoko
Berns, Michael W.
author_facet Kong, Xiangduo
Mohanty, Samarendra K.
Stephens, Jared
Heale, Jason T.
Gomez-Godinez, Veronica
Shi, Linda Z.
Kim, Jong-Soo
Yokomori, Kyoko
Berns, Michael W.
author_sort Kong, Xiangduo
collection PubMed
description Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technology to effectively analyze the in vivo DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage recognition process in mammalian cells. However, the damage-inducing characteristics of the different laser systems have not been fully investigated. Here we compare the nanosecond nitrogen 337 nm UVA laser with and without bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the nanosecond and picosecond 532 nm green second-harmonic Nd:YAG, and the femtosecond NIR 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser with regard to the type(s) of damage and corresponding cellular responses. Crosslinking damage (without significant nucleotide excision repair factor recruitment) and single-strand breaks (with corresponding repair factor recruitment) were common among all three wavelengths. Interestingly, UVA without BrdU uniquely produced base damage and aberrant DSB responses. Furthermore, the total energy required for the threshold H2AX phosphorylation induction was found to vary between the individual laser systems. The results indicate the involvement of different damage mechanisms dictated by wavelength and pulse duration. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2685111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26851112009-05-21 Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells Kong, Xiangduo Mohanty, Samarendra K. Stephens, Jared Heale, Jason T. Gomez-Godinez, Veronica Shi, Linda Z. Kim, Jong-Soo Yokomori, Kyoko Berns, Michael W. Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online Proper recognition and repair of DNA damage is critical for the cell to protect its genomic integrity. Laser microirradiation ranging in wavelength from ultraviolet A (UVA) to near-infrared (NIR) can be used to induce damage in a defined region in the cell nucleus, representing an innovative technology to effectively analyze the in vivo DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage recognition process in mammalian cells. However, the damage-inducing characteristics of the different laser systems have not been fully investigated. Here we compare the nanosecond nitrogen 337 nm UVA laser with and without bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), the nanosecond and picosecond 532 nm green second-harmonic Nd:YAG, and the femtosecond NIR 800 nm Ti:sapphire laser with regard to the type(s) of damage and corresponding cellular responses. Crosslinking damage (without significant nucleotide excision repair factor recruitment) and single-strand breaks (with corresponding repair factor recruitment) were common among all three wavelengths. Interestingly, UVA without BrdU uniquely produced base damage and aberrant DSB responses. Furthermore, the total energy required for the threshold H2AX phosphorylation induction was found to vary between the individual laser systems. The results indicate the involvement of different damage mechanisms dictated by wavelength and pulse duration. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed. Oxford University Press 2009-05 2009-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2685111/ /pubmed/19357094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Online
Kong, Xiangduo
Mohanty, Samarendra K.
Stephens, Jared
Heale, Jason T.
Gomez-Godinez, Veronica
Shi, Linda Z.
Kim, Jong-Soo
Yokomori, Kyoko
Berns, Michael W.
Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title_full Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title_short Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells
title_sort comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to dna damage in mammalian cells
topic Methods Online
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221
work_keys_str_mv AT kongxiangduo comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT mohantysamarendrak comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT stephensjared comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT healejasont comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT gomezgodinezveronica comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT shilindaz comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT kimjongsoo comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT yokomorikyoko comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells
AT bernsmichaelw comparativeanalysisofdifferentlasersystemstostudycellularresponsestodnadamageinmammaliancells