Cargando…

Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Tobacco is still the number one life style risk factor for ill health and premature death and also one of the major contributors to oral problems and diseases. Dentistry may be a potential setting for several aspects of clinical public health interventions and there is a growing interest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nohlert, Eva, Tegelberg, Åke, Tillgren, Per, Johansson, Pia, Rosenblad, Andreas, Helgason, Ásgeir R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19405969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-121
_version_ 1782167297687814144
author Nohlert, Eva
Tegelberg, Åke
Tillgren, Per
Johansson, Pia
Rosenblad, Andreas
Helgason, Ásgeir R
author_facet Nohlert, Eva
Tegelberg, Åke
Tillgren, Per
Johansson, Pia
Rosenblad, Andreas
Helgason, Ásgeir R
author_sort Nohlert, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco is still the number one life style risk factor for ill health and premature death and also one of the major contributors to oral problems and diseases. Dentistry may be a potential setting for several aspects of clinical public health interventions and there is a growing interest in several countries to develop tobacco cessation support in dentistry setting. The aim of the present study was to assess the relative effectiveness of a high intensity intervention compared with a low intensity intervention for smoking cessation support in a dental clinic setting. METHODS: 300 smokers attending dental or general health care were randomly assigned to two arms and referred to the local dental clinic for smoking cessation support. One arm received support with low intensity treatment (LIT), whereas the other group was assigned to high intensity treatment (HIT) support. The main outcome measures included self-reported point prevalence and continuous abstinence (≥ 183 days) at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up questionnaires were returned from 86% of the participants. People in the HIT-arm were twice as likely to report continuous abstinence compared with the LIT-arm (18% vs. 9%, p = 0.02). There was a difference (not significant) between the arms in point prevalence abstinence in favour of the HIT-protocol (23% vs. 16%). However, point prevalence cessation rates in the LIT-arm reporting additional support were relatively high (23%) compared with available data assessing abstinence in smokers trying to quit without professional support. CONCLUSION: Screening for willingness to quit smoking within the health care system and offering smoking cessation support within dentistry may be an effective model for smoking cessation support in Sweden. The LIT approach is less expensive and time consuming and may be appropriate as a first treatment option, but should be integrated with other forms of available support in the community. The more extensive and expensive HIT-protocol should be offered to those who are unable to quit with the LIT approach in combination with other support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT00670514
format Text
id pubmed-2685131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26851312009-05-22 Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial Nohlert, Eva Tegelberg, Åke Tillgren, Per Johansson, Pia Rosenblad, Andreas Helgason, Ásgeir R BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Tobacco is still the number one life style risk factor for ill health and premature death and also one of the major contributors to oral problems and diseases. Dentistry may be a potential setting for several aspects of clinical public health interventions and there is a growing interest in several countries to develop tobacco cessation support in dentistry setting. The aim of the present study was to assess the relative effectiveness of a high intensity intervention compared with a low intensity intervention for smoking cessation support in a dental clinic setting. METHODS: 300 smokers attending dental or general health care were randomly assigned to two arms and referred to the local dental clinic for smoking cessation support. One arm received support with low intensity treatment (LIT), whereas the other group was assigned to high intensity treatment (HIT) support. The main outcome measures included self-reported point prevalence and continuous abstinence (≥ 183 days) at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up questionnaires were returned from 86% of the participants. People in the HIT-arm were twice as likely to report continuous abstinence compared with the LIT-arm (18% vs. 9%, p = 0.02). There was a difference (not significant) between the arms in point prevalence abstinence in favour of the HIT-protocol (23% vs. 16%). However, point prevalence cessation rates in the LIT-arm reporting additional support were relatively high (23%) compared with available data assessing abstinence in smokers trying to quit without professional support. CONCLUSION: Screening for willingness to quit smoking within the health care system and offering smoking cessation support within dentistry may be an effective model for smoking cessation support in Sweden. The LIT approach is less expensive and time consuming and may be appropriate as a first treatment option, but should be integrated with other forms of available support in the community. The more extensive and expensive HIT-protocol should be offered to those who are unable to quit with the LIT approach in combination with other support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT00670514 BioMed Central 2009-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2685131/ /pubmed/19405969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-121 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nohlert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nohlert, Eva
Tegelberg, Åke
Tillgren, Per
Johansson, Pia
Rosenblad, Andreas
Helgason, Ásgeir R
Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title_full Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title_fullStr Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title_short Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden – a randomized trial
title_sort comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in sweden – a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19405969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-121
work_keys_str_mv AT nohlerteva comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial
AT tegelbergake comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial
AT tillgrenper comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial
AT johanssonpia comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial
AT rosenbladandreas comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial
AT helgasonasgeirr comparisonofahighandalowintensitysmokingcessationinterventioninadentistrysettinginswedenarandomizedtrial