Cargando…

Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?

BACKGROUND: Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIAscopy™) is a multispectral imaging technique that is used to identify 'suspicious' (i.e. potentially malignant) pigmented skin lesions for further investigation. The MoleMate™ system is a hand-held scanner that captures SIAscopy™ i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Tony, Walter, Fiona M, Wood, Annabel, Morris, Helen, Hall, Per, Karner, Simone, Emery, Jon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19402916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-8-3
_version_ 1782167324799795200
author Watson, Tony
Walter, Fiona M
Wood, Annabel
Morris, Helen
Hall, Per
Karner, Simone
Emery, Jon
author_facet Watson, Tony
Walter, Fiona M
Wood, Annabel
Morris, Helen
Hall, Per
Karner, Simone
Emery, Jon
author_sort Watson, Tony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIAscopy™) is a multispectral imaging technique that is used to identify 'suspicious' (i.e. potentially malignant) pigmented skin lesions for further investigation. The MoleMate™ system is a hand-held scanner that captures SIAscopy™ images that are then classified by the clinician using a computerized diagnostic algorithm designed for the primary health care setting. The objectives of this study were to test the effectiveness of a computer program designed to train health care workers to identify the diagnostic features of SIAscopy™ images and compare the results of a group of Australian and a group of English general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: Thirty GPs recruited from the Perth (Western Australia) metropolitan area completed the training program at a workshop held in March 2008. The accuracy and speed of their pre- and post-test scores were then compared with those of a group of 18 GPs (including 10 GP registrars) who completed a similar program at two workshops held in Cambridge (U.K.) in March and April, 2007. RESULTS: The median test score of the Australian GPs improved from 79.5% to 86.5% (median increase 5.5%; p < 0.001) while the median test score of the English GPs improved from 74.5% to 86.5% (median increase 9.5%; p < 0.001). The Australian GPs had significantly higher pre-test scores but there were no significant differences in post-test scores between the Australian and English GPs or between the GPs and GP registrars. There was no significant difference in scores between GPs with previous dermoscopy experience or dermatology training. CONCLUSION: Most of the SIAscopy™ features can be learnt to a reasonable degree of accuracy with this brief computer training program. Although the Australian GPs scored higher in the pre-test, both groups had similar levels of accuracy and speed in interpreting the SIAscopy™ features after completing the program. Scores were not affected by previous dermoscopy experience or dermatology training, which suggests that the MoleMate™ system is relatively easy to learn.
format Text
id pubmed-2685413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26854132009-05-22 Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues? Watson, Tony Walter, Fiona M Wood, Annabel Morris, Helen Hall, Per Karner, Simone Emery, Jon Asia Pac Fam Med Research BACKGROUND: Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIAscopy™) is a multispectral imaging technique that is used to identify 'suspicious' (i.e. potentially malignant) pigmented skin lesions for further investigation. The MoleMate™ system is a hand-held scanner that captures SIAscopy™ images that are then classified by the clinician using a computerized diagnostic algorithm designed for the primary health care setting. The objectives of this study were to test the effectiveness of a computer program designed to train health care workers to identify the diagnostic features of SIAscopy™ images and compare the results of a group of Australian and a group of English general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: Thirty GPs recruited from the Perth (Western Australia) metropolitan area completed the training program at a workshop held in March 2008. The accuracy and speed of their pre- and post-test scores were then compared with those of a group of 18 GPs (including 10 GP registrars) who completed a similar program at two workshops held in Cambridge (U.K.) in March and April, 2007. RESULTS: The median test score of the Australian GPs improved from 79.5% to 86.5% (median increase 5.5%; p < 0.001) while the median test score of the English GPs improved from 74.5% to 86.5% (median increase 9.5%; p < 0.001). The Australian GPs had significantly higher pre-test scores but there were no significant differences in post-test scores between the Australian and English GPs or between the GPs and GP registrars. There was no significant difference in scores between GPs with previous dermoscopy experience or dermatology training. CONCLUSION: Most of the SIAscopy™ features can be learnt to a reasonable degree of accuracy with this brief computer training program. Although the Australian GPs scored higher in the pre-test, both groups had similar levels of accuracy and speed in interpreting the SIAscopy™ features after completing the program. Scores were not affected by previous dermoscopy experience or dermatology training, which suggests that the MoleMate™ system is relatively easy to learn. BioMed Central 2009-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2685413/ /pubmed/19402916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-8-3 Text en Copyright © 2009 Watson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Watson, Tony
Walter, Fiona M
Wood, Annabel
Morris, Helen
Hall, Per
Karner, Simone
Emery, Jon
Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title_full Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title_fullStr Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title_full_unstemmed Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title_short Learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are Australian general practitioners better than their U.K. colleagues?
title_sort learning a novel technique to identify possible melanomas: are australian general practitioners better than their u.k. colleagues?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19402916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-8-3
work_keys_str_mv AT watsontony learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT walterfionam learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT woodannabel learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT morrishelen learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT hallper learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT karnersimone learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues
AT emeryjon learninganoveltechniquetoidentifypossiblemelanomasareaustraliangeneralpractitionersbetterthantheirukcolleagues