Cargando…
Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19451126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222 |
_version_ | 1782167326216421376 |
---|---|
author | Olff, Han Alonso, David Berg, Matty P. Eriksson, B. Klemens Loreau, Michel Piersma, Theunis Rooney, Neil |
author_facet | Olff, Han Alonso, David Berg, Matty P. Eriksson, B. Klemens Loreau, Michel Piersma, Theunis Rooney, Neil |
author_sort | Olff, Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, however, will always operate simultaneously with networks based on other types of ecological interaction, such as through the activities of ecosystem engineers or mutualistic interactions. Little is known about how to classify, organize and quantify these other ecological networks and their mutual interplay. The aim of this paper is to provide new and testable ideas on how to understand and model ecosystems in which many different types of ecological interaction operate simultaneously. We approach this problem by first identifying six main types of interaction that operate within ecosystems, of which food web interactions are one. Then, we propose that food webs are structured among two main axes of organization: a vertical (classic) axis representing trophic position and a new horizontal ‘ecological stoichiometry’ axis representing decreasing palatability of plant parts and detritus for herbivores and detrivores and slower turnover times. The usefulness of these new ideas is then explored with three very different ecosystems as test cases: temperate intertidal mudflats; temperate short grass prairie; and tropical savannah. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2685422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26854222009-06-27 Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems Olff, Han Alonso, David Berg, Matty P. Eriksson, B. Klemens Loreau, Michel Piersma, Theunis Rooney, Neil Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Review In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, however, will always operate simultaneously with networks based on other types of ecological interaction, such as through the activities of ecosystem engineers or mutualistic interactions. Little is known about how to classify, organize and quantify these other ecological networks and their mutual interplay. The aim of this paper is to provide new and testable ideas on how to understand and model ecosystems in which many different types of ecological interaction operate simultaneously. We approach this problem by first identifying six main types of interaction that operate within ecosystems, of which food web interactions are one. Then, we propose that food webs are structured among two main axes of organization: a vertical (classic) axis representing trophic position and a new horizontal ‘ecological stoichiometry’ axis representing decreasing palatability of plant parts and detritus for herbivores and detrivores and slower turnover times. The usefulness of these new ideas is then explored with three very different ecosystems as test cases: temperate intertidal mudflats; temperate short grass prairie; and tropical savannah. The Royal Society 2009-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2685422/ /pubmed/19451126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Olff, Han Alonso, David Berg, Matty P. Eriksson, B. Klemens Loreau, Michel Piersma, Theunis Rooney, Neil Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title | Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title_full | Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title_fullStr | Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title_full_unstemmed | Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title_short | Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
title_sort | parallel ecological networks in ecosystems |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19451126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olffhan parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT alonsodavid parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT bergmattyp parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT erikssonbklemens parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT loreaumichel parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT piersmatheunis parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems AT rooneyneil parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems |