Cargando…

Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems

In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olff, Han, Alonso, David, Berg, Matty P., Eriksson, B. Klemens, Loreau, Michel, Piersma, Theunis, Rooney, Neil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19451126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222
_version_ 1782167326216421376
author Olff, Han
Alonso, David
Berg, Matty P.
Eriksson, B. Klemens
Loreau, Michel
Piersma, Theunis
Rooney, Neil
author_facet Olff, Han
Alonso, David
Berg, Matty P.
Eriksson, B. Klemens
Loreau, Michel
Piersma, Theunis
Rooney, Neil
author_sort Olff, Han
collection PubMed
description In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, however, will always operate simultaneously with networks based on other types of ecological interaction, such as through the activities of ecosystem engineers or mutualistic interactions. Little is known about how to classify, organize and quantify these other ecological networks and their mutual interplay. The aim of this paper is to provide new and testable ideas on how to understand and model ecosystems in which many different types of ecological interaction operate simultaneously. We approach this problem by first identifying six main types of interaction that operate within ecosystems, of which food web interactions are one. Then, we propose that food webs are structured among two main axes of organization: a vertical (classic) axis representing trophic position and a new horizontal ‘ecological stoichiometry’ axis representing decreasing palatability of plant parts and detritus for herbivores and detrivores and slower turnover times. The usefulness of these new ideas is then explored with three very different ecosystems as test cases: temperate intertidal mudflats; temperate short grass prairie; and tropical savannah.
format Text
id pubmed-2685422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26854222009-06-27 Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems Olff, Han Alonso, David Berg, Matty P. Eriksson, B. Klemens Loreau, Michel Piersma, Theunis Rooney, Neil Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Review In ecosystems, species interact with other species directly and through abiotic factors in multiple ways, often forming complex networks of various types of ecological interaction. Out of this suite of interactions, predator–prey interactions have received most attention. The resulting food webs, however, will always operate simultaneously with networks based on other types of ecological interaction, such as through the activities of ecosystem engineers or mutualistic interactions. Little is known about how to classify, organize and quantify these other ecological networks and their mutual interplay. The aim of this paper is to provide new and testable ideas on how to understand and model ecosystems in which many different types of ecological interaction operate simultaneously. We approach this problem by first identifying six main types of interaction that operate within ecosystems, of which food web interactions are one. Then, we propose that food webs are structured among two main axes of organization: a vertical (classic) axis representing trophic position and a new horizontal ‘ecological stoichiometry’ axis representing decreasing palatability of plant parts and detritus for herbivores and detrivores and slower turnover times. The usefulness of these new ideas is then explored with three very different ecosystems as test cases: temperate intertidal mudflats; temperate short grass prairie; and tropical savannah. The Royal Society 2009-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2685422/ /pubmed/19451126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Olff, Han
Alonso, David
Berg, Matty P.
Eriksson, B. Klemens
Loreau, Michel
Piersma, Theunis
Rooney, Neil
Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title_full Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title_fullStr Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title_short Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
title_sort parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19451126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0222
work_keys_str_mv AT olffhan parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT alonsodavid parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT bergmattyp parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT erikssonbklemens parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT loreaumichel parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT piersmatheunis parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems
AT rooneyneil parallelecologicalnetworksinecosystems