Cargando…

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The study design was a methodological systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The data sources were MEDLINE and the Coch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ethgen, Morgane, Boutron, Isabelle, Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Roy, Carine, Ravaud, Philippe
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2009
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19413903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-29

Ejemplares similares

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Knee Arthroplasty: Disabilities in Comparison to the General Population and to Hip Arthroplasty Using a French National Longitudinal Survey
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
por: Kapp, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
por: Barnes, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Fourcade, Lola, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
por: Oikonomidi, Theodora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
por: Naidoo, Nivantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs
por: Konrat, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Correction to: Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

In stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Eyüboğlu, Mehmet
Publicado: (2016)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e29i82t4hmrdrvi7sa351o5rg9