Cargando…

The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies

The latest version of CATH (class, architecture, topology, homology) (version 3.2), released in July 2008 (http://www.cathdb.info), contains 1 14 215 domains, 2178 Homologous superfamilies and 1110 fold groups. We have assigned 20 330 new domains, 87 new homologous superfamilies and 26 new folds sin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuff, Alison L., Sillitoe, Ian, Lewis, Tony, Redfern, Oliver C., Garratt, Richard, Thornton, Janet, Orengo, Christine A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18996897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn877
_version_ 1782167444998062080
author Cuff, Alison L.
Sillitoe, Ian
Lewis, Tony
Redfern, Oliver C.
Garratt, Richard
Thornton, Janet
Orengo, Christine A.
author_facet Cuff, Alison L.
Sillitoe, Ian
Lewis, Tony
Redfern, Oliver C.
Garratt, Richard
Thornton, Janet
Orengo, Christine A.
author_sort Cuff, Alison L.
collection PubMed
description The latest version of CATH (class, architecture, topology, homology) (version 3.2), released in July 2008 (http://www.cathdb.info), contains 1 14 215 domains, 2178 Homologous superfamilies and 1110 fold groups. We have assigned 20 330 new domains, 87 new homologous superfamilies and 26 new folds since CATH release version 3.1. A total of 28 064 new domains have been assigned since our NAR 2007 database publication (CATH version 3.0). The CATH website has been completely redesigned and includes more comprehensive documentation. We have revisited the CATH architecture level as part of the development of a ‘Protein Chart’ and present information on the population of each architecture. The CATHEDRAL structure comparison algorithm has been improved and used to characterize structural diversity in CATH superfamilies and structural overlaps between superfamilies. Although the majority of superfamilies in CATH are not structurally diverse and do not overlap significantly with other superfamilies, ∼4% of superfamilies are very diverse and these are the superfamilies that are most highly populated in both the PDB and in the genomes. Information on the degree of structural diversity in each superfamily and structural overlaps between superfamilies can now be downloaded from the CATH website.
format Text
id pubmed-2686597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26865972009-05-26 The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies Cuff, Alison L. Sillitoe, Ian Lewis, Tony Redfern, Oliver C. Garratt, Richard Thornton, Janet Orengo, Christine A. Nucleic Acids Res Articles The latest version of CATH (class, architecture, topology, homology) (version 3.2), released in July 2008 (http://www.cathdb.info), contains 1 14 215 domains, 2178 Homologous superfamilies and 1110 fold groups. We have assigned 20 330 new domains, 87 new homologous superfamilies and 26 new folds since CATH release version 3.1. A total of 28 064 new domains have been assigned since our NAR 2007 database publication (CATH version 3.0). The CATH website has been completely redesigned and includes more comprehensive documentation. We have revisited the CATH architecture level as part of the development of a ‘Protein Chart’ and present information on the population of each architecture. The CATHEDRAL structure comparison algorithm has been improved and used to characterize structural diversity in CATH superfamilies and structural overlaps between superfamilies. Although the majority of superfamilies in CATH are not structurally diverse and do not overlap significantly with other superfamilies, ∼4% of superfamilies are very diverse and these are the superfamilies that are most highly populated in both the PDB and in the genomes. Information on the degree of structural diversity in each superfamily and structural overlaps between superfamilies can now be downloaded from the CATH website. Oxford University Press 2009-01 2008-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2686597/ /pubmed/18996897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn877 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Cuff, Alison L.
Sillitoe, Ian
Lewis, Tony
Redfern, Oliver C.
Garratt, Richard
Thornton, Janet
Orengo, Christine A.
The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title_full The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title_fullStr The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title_full_unstemmed The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title_short The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
title_sort cath classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18996897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn877
work_keys_str_mv AT cuffalisonl thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT sillitoeian thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT lewistony thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT redfernoliverc thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT garrattrichard thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT thorntonjanet thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT orengochristinea thecathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT cuffalisonl cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT sillitoeian cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT lewistony cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT redfernoliverc cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT garrattrichard cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT thorntonjanet cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies
AT orengochristinea cathclassificationrevisitedarchitecturesreviewedandnewwaystocharacterizestructuraldivergenceinsuperfamilies