Cargando…
Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin
BACKGROUND: Burkholderia mallei is a zoonotic Gram negative bacterium which primarily infects solipeds but can cause lethal disease in humans if left untreated. The effect of two antibiotics with different modes of action on Burkholderia mallei strain ATCC23344 was investigated by using in vitro and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-88 |
_version_ | 1782167464003502080 |
---|---|
author | Judy, Barbara M Whitlock, Gregory C Torres, Alfredo G Estes, D Mark |
author_facet | Judy, Barbara M Whitlock, Gregory C Torres, Alfredo G Estes, D Mark |
author_sort | Judy, Barbara M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Burkholderia mallei is a zoonotic Gram negative bacterium which primarily infects solipeds but can cause lethal disease in humans if left untreated. The effect of two antibiotics with different modes of action on Burkholderia mallei strain ATCC23344 was investigated by using in vitro and in vivo studies. RESULTS: Determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in vitro was done by the agar diffusion method and the dilution method. The MICs of levofloxacin and ceftazidime were in the similar range, 2.5 and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively. Intracellular susceptibility of the bacterium to these two antibiotics in J774A.1 mouse macrophages in vitro was also investigated. Macrophages treated with antibiotics demonstrated uptake of the drugs and reduced bacterial loads in vitro. The efficacy of ceftazidime and levofloxacin were studied in BALB/c mice as post-exposure treatment following intranasal B. mallei infection. Intranasal infection with 5 × 10(5 )CFUs of B. mallei resulted in 90% death in non-treated control mice. Antibiotic treatments 10 days post-infection proved to be effective in vivo with all antibiotic treated mice surviving to day 34 post-infection. The antibiotics did not result in complete clearance of the bacterial infection and presence of the bacteria was found in lungs and spleens of the survivors, although bacterial burden recovered from levofloxacin treated animals appeared reduced compared to ceftazidime. CONCLUSION: Both antibiotics demonstrated utility for the treatment of glanders, including the ability for intracellular penetration and clearance of organisms in vitro. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2686712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26867122009-05-27 Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin Judy, Barbara M Whitlock, Gregory C Torres, Alfredo G Estes, D Mark BMC Microbiol Research article BACKGROUND: Burkholderia mallei is a zoonotic Gram negative bacterium which primarily infects solipeds but can cause lethal disease in humans if left untreated. The effect of two antibiotics with different modes of action on Burkholderia mallei strain ATCC23344 was investigated by using in vitro and in vivo studies. RESULTS: Determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in vitro was done by the agar diffusion method and the dilution method. The MICs of levofloxacin and ceftazidime were in the similar range, 2.5 and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively. Intracellular susceptibility of the bacterium to these two antibiotics in J774A.1 mouse macrophages in vitro was also investigated. Macrophages treated with antibiotics demonstrated uptake of the drugs and reduced bacterial loads in vitro. The efficacy of ceftazidime and levofloxacin were studied in BALB/c mice as post-exposure treatment following intranasal B. mallei infection. Intranasal infection with 5 × 10(5 )CFUs of B. mallei resulted in 90% death in non-treated control mice. Antibiotic treatments 10 days post-infection proved to be effective in vivo with all antibiotic treated mice surviving to day 34 post-infection. The antibiotics did not result in complete clearance of the bacterial infection and presence of the bacteria was found in lungs and spleens of the survivors, although bacterial burden recovered from levofloxacin treated animals appeared reduced compared to ceftazidime. CONCLUSION: Both antibiotics demonstrated utility for the treatment of glanders, including the ability for intracellular penetration and clearance of organisms in vitro. BioMed Central 2009-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2686712/ /pubmed/19426516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-88 Text en Copyright ©2009 Judy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Judy, Barbara M Whitlock, Gregory C Torres, Alfredo G Estes, D Mark Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title | Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title_full | Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title_short | Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of Burkholderia mallei to Ceftazidime and Levofloxacin |
title_sort | comparison of the in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of burkholderia mallei to ceftazidime and levofloxacin |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-88 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT judybarbaram comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivosusceptibilitiesofburkholderiamalleitoceftazidimeandlevofloxacin AT whitlockgregoryc comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivosusceptibilitiesofburkholderiamalleitoceftazidimeandlevofloxacin AT torresalfredog comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivosusceptibilitiesofburkholderiamalleitoceftazidimeandlevofloxacin AT estesdmark comparisonoftheinvitroandinvivosusceptibilitiesofburkholderiamalleitoceftazidimeandlevofloxacin |