Cargando…

Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of natural products (NPs) is being evaluated using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with increasing frequency, yet a search of the literature did not identify a widely accepted critical appraisal instrument developed specifically for use with NPs. The purpose of this proj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jurgens, Tannis, Whelan, Anne Marie, MacDonald, Melissa, Lord, Lindsay
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19389240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-9-11
_version_ 1782167525732122624
author Jurgens, Tannis
Whelan, Anne Marie
MacDonald, Melissa
Lord, Lindsay
author_facet Jurgens, Tannis
Whelan, Anne Marie
MacDonald, Melissa
Lord, Lindsay
author_sort Jurgens, Tannis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of natural products (NPs) is being evaluated using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with increasing frequency, yet a search of the literature did not identify a widely accepted critical appraisal instrument developed specifically for use with NPs. The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a critical appraisal instrument that is sufficiently rigorous to be used in evaluating RCTs of conventional medicines, and also has a section specific for use with single entity NPs, including herbs and natural sourced chemicals. METHODS: Three phases of the project included: 1) using experts and a Delphi process to reach consensus on a list of items essential in describing the identity of an NP; 2) compiling a list of non-NP items important for evaluating the quality of an RCT using systematic review methodology to identify published instruments and then compiling item categories that were part of a validated instrument and/or had empirical evidence to support their inclusion and 3) conducting a field test to compare the new instrument to a published instrument for usefulness in evaluating the quality of 3 RCTs of a NP and in applying results to practice. RESULTS: Two Delphi rounds resulted in a list of 15 items essential in describing NPs. Seventeen item categories fitting inclusion criteria were identified from published instruments for conventional medicines. The new assessment instrument was assembled based on content of the two lists and the addition of a Reviewer's Conclusion section. The field test of the new instrument showed good criterion validity. Participants found it useful in translating evidence from RCTs to practice. CONCLUSION: A new instrument for the critical appraisal of RCTs of NPs was developed and tested. The instrument is distinct from other available assessment instruments for RCTs of NPs in its systematic development and validation. The instrument is ready to be used by pharmacy students, health care practitioners and academics and will continue to be refined as required.
format Text
id pubmed-2687413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26874132009-05-28 Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products Jurgens, Tannis Whelan, Anne Marie MacDonald, Melissa Lord, Lindsay BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of natural products (NPs) is being evaluated using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with increasing frequency, yet a search of the literature did not identify a widely accepted critical appraisal instrument developed specifically for use with NPs. The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a critical appraisal instrument that is sufficiently rigorous to be used in evaluating RCTs of conventional medicines, and also has a section specific for use with single entity NPs, including herbs and natural sourced chemicals. METHODS: Three phases of the project included: 1) using experts and a Delphi process to reach consensus on a list of items essential in describing the identity of an NP; 2) compiling a list of non-NP items important for evaluating the quality of an RCT using systematic review methodology to identify published instruments and then compiling item categories that were part of a validated instrument and/or had empirical evidence to support their inclusion and 3) conducting a field test to compare the new instrument to a published instrument for usefulness in evaluating the quality of 3 RCTs of a NP and in applying results to practice. RESULTS: Two Delphi rounds resulted in a list of 15 items essential in describing NPs. Seventeen item categories fitting inclusion criteria were identified from published instruments for conventional medicines. The new assessment instrument was assembled based on content of the two lists and the addition of a Reviewer's Conclusion section. The field test of the new instrument showed good criterion validity. Participants found it useful in translating evidence from RCTs to practice. CONCLUSION: A new instrument for the critical appraisal of RCTs of NPs was developed and tested. The instrument is distinct from other available assessment instruments for RCTs of NPs in its systematic development and validation. The instrument is ready to be used by pharmacy students, health care practitioners and academics and will continue to be refined as required. BioMed Central 2009-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2687413/ /pubmed/19389240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-9-11 Text en Copyright © 2009 Jurgens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jurgens, Tannis
Whelan, Anne Marie
MacDonald, Melissa
Lord, Lindsay
Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title_full Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title_short Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
title_sort development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19389240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-9-11
work_keys_str_mv AT jurgenstannis developmentandevaluationofaninstrumentforthecriticalappraisalofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofnaturalproducts
AT whelanannemarie developmentandevaluationofaninstrumentforthecriticalappraisalofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofnaturalproducts
AT macdonaldmelissa developmentandevaluationofaninstrumentforthecriticalappraisalofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofnaturalproducts
AT lordlindsay developmentandevaluationofaninstrumentforthecriticalappraisalofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofnaturalproducts