Cargando…

Comparison of Efficacy of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam and Imipenem/Cilastatin for Treatment of Acinetobacter Bacteremia

Multiple antibiotic reisistance threatens successful treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections worldwide. Increasing interest in the well-known activity of sulbactam against the genus Acinetobacter has been aroused. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes for patients with Acinet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jun Yong, Kim, Chang Oh, Park, Yoon Seon, Yoon, Hee Jung, Shin, So Youn, Kim, Young Keun, Kim, Myung Soo, Kim, Yeon-A, Song, Young Goo, Yong, Dongeun, Lee, Kyungwon, Kim, June Myung
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16502486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.1.63
Descripción
Sumario:Multiple antibiotic reisistance threatens successful treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections worldwide. Increasing interest in the well-known activity of sulbactam against the genus Acinetobacter has been aroused. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes for patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam versus imipenem/cilastatin. Forty-seven patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia were analyzed through a retrospective review of their medical records for antibiotic therapy and clinical outcome. Thirty-five patients were treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam, and twelve patients with imipenem/cilastatin. The percentage of favorable response after 72 hours was not statistically different between cefoperazone/ sulbactam group and imipenem/ cilastatin group. The mortality rate was not statistically different, too. Cefoperazone/sulbactam was found to be as useful as imipenem/cilastatin for treating patients with Acinetobacter bacteremia.