Cargando…

The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy

The CobraPLA™ (CPLA) is a relatively new supraglottic airway device that has not been sufficiently investigated. Here, we performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the CPLA during controlled ventilation. In 50 anesthetized and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Sang Beom, Shim, Yon Hee, Kim, Min Soo, You, Young Chul, Lee, Youn-Woo, Han, Dong Woo, Lee, Jong Seok
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17191308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.799
_version_ 1782167599162851328
author Nam, Sang Beom
Shim, Yon Hee
Kim, Min Soo
You, Young Chul
Lee, Youn-Woo
Han, Dong Woo
Lee, Jong Seok
author_facet Nam, Sang Beom
Shim, Yon Hee
Kim, Min Soo
You, Young Chul
Lee, Youn-Woo
Han, Dong Woo
Lee, Jong Seok
author_sort Nam, Sang Beom
collection PubMed
description The CobraPLA™ (CPLA) is a relatively new supraglottic airway device that has not been sufficiently investigated. Here, we performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the CPLA during controlled ventilation. In 50 anesthetized and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery a CPLA was inserted and inflated to an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H(2)O. The success rate of insertion upon the first attempt was 82% (41/50), with a mean insertion time of 16.3 ± 4.5 seconds. The adequacy of ventilation was assessed by observing the end tidal CO(2) waveform, movement of the chest wall, peak airway pressure (13.5 cm H(2)O), and leak fraction (4%). We documented the airway sealing pressure (22.5 cm H(2)O) and noted that the the site of gas leaks at that pressure were either at the neck (52%), the abdomen (46%), or both (2%). In 44 (88%) patients, the vocal cords were visible in the fiberoptic view through the CPLA. There was no gastric insufflation during the anesthesia. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters remained stable during CPLA insertion. Postoperative blood staining of CPLA was minimal, occurring in 22% (11/50) of patients. Mild and moderate throat soreness was reported in 44% (22/50) and 4% (2/50) of patients, respectively. Lastly, mild dysphonia was observed in 6% (3/50) of patients and mild dysphagia in 10% (5/50) of patients. Our results indicated that the CPLA is both easy to place and allows adequate ventilation during controlled ventilation.
format Text
id pubmed-2687819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26878192009-06-04 The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy Nam, Sang Beom Shim, Yon Hee Kim, Min Soo You, Young Chul Lee, Youn-Woo Han, Dong Woo Lee, Jong Seok Yonsei Med J Original Article The CobraPLA™ (CPLA) is a relatively new supraglottic airway device that has not been sufficiently investigated. Here, we performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the CPLA during controlled ventilation. In 50 anesthetized and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery a CPLA was inserted and inflated to an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H(2)O. The success rate of insertion upon the first attempt was 82% (41/50), with a mean insertion time of 16.3 ± 4.5 seconds. The adequacy of ventilation was assessed by observing the end tidal CO(2) waveform, movement of the chest wall, peak airway pressure (13.5 cm H(2)O), and leak fraction (4%). We documented the airway sealing pressure (22.5 cm H(2)O) and noted that the the site of gas leaks at that pressure were either at the neck (52%), the abdomen (46%), or both (2%). In 44 (88%) patients, the vocal cords were visible in the fiberoptic view through the CPLA. There was no gastric insufflation during the anesthesia. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters remained stable during CPLA insertion. Postoperative blood staining of CPLA was minimal, occurring in 22% (11/50) of patients. Mild and moderate throat soreness was reported in 44% (22/50) and 4% (2/50) of patients, respectively. Lastly, mild dysphonia was observed in 6% (3/50) of patients and mild dysphagia in 10% (5/50) of patients. Our results indicated that the CPLA is both easy to place and allows adequate ventilation during controlled ventilation. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2006-12-31 2006-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2687819/ /pubmed/17191308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.799 Text en Copyright © 2006 The Yonsei University College of Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nam, Sang Beom
Shim, Yon Hee
Kim, Min Soo
You, Young Chul
Lee, Youn-Woo
Han, Dong Woo
Lee, Jong Seok
The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title_full The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title_fullStr The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title_short The CobraPLA™ During Anesthesia with Controlled Ventilation: A Clinical Trial of Efficacy
title_sort cobrapla™ during anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a clinical trial of efficacy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17191308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.6.799
work_keys_str_mv AT namsangbeom thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT shimyonhee thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT kimminsoo thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT youyoungchul thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT leeyounwoo thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT handongwoo thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT leejongseok thecobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT namsangbeom cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT shimyonhee cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT kimminsoo cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT youyoungchul cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT leeyounwoo cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT handongwoo cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy
AT leejongseok cobrapladuringanesthesiawithcontrolledventilationaclinicaltrialofefficacy