Cargando…
Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease
To be effective and sustain themselves over time, public-private partnerships must make evaluation a priority. Specifically, partnerships should evaluate 1) their infrastructure, function, and processes; 2) programs designed to achieve their mission, goals, and objectives; and 3) changes in health a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289007 |
_version_ | 1782167609308872704 |
---|---|
author | Butterfoss, Frances Dunn |
author_facet | Butterfoss, Frances Dunn |
author_sort | Butterfoss, Frances Dunn |
collection | PubMed |
description | To be effective and sustain themselves over time, public-private partnerships must make evaluation a priority. Specifically, partnerships should evaluate 1) their infrastructure, function, and processes; 2) programs designed to achieve their mission, goals, and objectives; and 3) changes in health and social status, organizations, systems, and the broader community. This article describes how to 1) develop a comprehensive evaluation strategy based on partnership theory; 2) select short-term, intermediate, and long-term indicators to measure outcomes; 3) choose appropriate methods and tools; and 4) use evaluation results to provide accountability to stakeholders and improve partnership function and program implementation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2687870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26878702009-06-29 Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease Butterfoss, Frances Dunn Prev Chronic Dis Tools and Techniques To be effective and sustain themselves over time, public-private partnerships must make evaluation a priority. Specifically, partnerships should evaluate 1) their infrastructure, function, and processes; 2) programs designed to achieve their mission, goals, and objectives; and 3) changes in health and social status, organizations, systems, and the broader community. This article describes how to 1) develop a comprehensive evaluation strategy based on partnership theory; 2) select short-term, intermediate, and long-term indicators to measure outcomes; 3) choose appropriate methods and tools; and 4) use evaluation results to provide accountability to stakeholders and improve partnership function and program implementation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2687870/ /pubmed/19289007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Tools and Techniques Butterfoss, Frances Dunn Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title | Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title_full | Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title_short | Evaluating Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease |
title_sort | evaluating partnerships to prevent and manage chronic disease |
topic | Tools and Techniques |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butterfossfrancesdunn evaluatingpartnershipstopreventandmanagechronicdisease |