Cargando…

SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreyger, Frank, Scharioth, Gabor, Baatz, Holger
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478908
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057
_version_ 1782167623500300288
author Schreyger, Frank
Scharioth, Gabor
Baatz, Holger
author_facet Schreyger, Frank
Scharioth, Gabor
Baatz, Holger
author_sort Schreyger, Frank
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye and T-Flux(®) in the contralateral eye. RESULTS: In eyes with SKGEL(®) the IOP decreased from 20.6+7.3 mm Hg to 14.8+5.3 mm Hg (-5.8 mm Hg or -28.1%), and in eyes with T-Flux(®) from 19.9+7.2 mm Hg to 14.7+3.3 mm Hg (-5.2 mm Hg or -26.1%, no statistically significant difference, p >0.05). Antiglaucoma medications with either implant decreased from initially 2.0+0.8 to 0.3+0.7. A qualified success was found in 17/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 16/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). Complete success was achieved in 14/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 13/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering effect and safety of SKGEL(®) and T-Flux(®) seem to be comparable.
format Text
id pubmed-2687930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26879302009-05-28 SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up Schreyger, Frank Scharioth, Gabor Baatz, Holger Open Ophthalmol J Article PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye and T-Flux(®) in the contralateral eye. RESULTS: In eyes with SKGEL(®) the IOP decreased from 20.6+7.3 mm Hg to 14.8+5.3 mm Hg (-5.8 mm Hg or -28.1%), and in eyes with T-Flux(®) from 19.9+7.2 mm Hg to 14.7+3.3 mm Hg (-5.2 mm Hg or -26.1%, no statistically significant difference, p >0.05). Antiglaucoma medications with either implant decreased from initially 2.0+0.8 to 0.3+0.7. A qualified success was found in 17/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 16/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). Complete success was achieved in 14/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 13/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering effect and safety of SKGEL(®) and T-Flux(®) seem to be comparable. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2008-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2687930/ /pubmed/19478908 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057 Text en 2008 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/) which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Schreyger, Frank
Scharioth, Gabor
Baatz, Holger
SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title_fullStr SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title_short SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
title_sort skgel® implant versus t-flux® implant in the contralateral eye in deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification: long-term follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478908
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057
work_keys_str_mv AT schreygerfrank skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup
AT schariothgabor skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup
AT baatzholger skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup