Cargando…
SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up
PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478908 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057 |
_version_ | 1782167623500300288 |
---|---|
author | Schreyger, Frank Scharioth, Gabor Baatz, Holger |
author_facet | Schreyger, Frank Scharioth, Gabor Baatz, Holger |
author_sort | Schreyger, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye and T-Flux(®) in the contralateral eye. RESULTS: In eyes with SKGEL(®) the IOP decreased from 20.6+7.3 mm Hg to 14.8+5.3 mm Hg (-5.8 mm Hg or -28.1%), and in eyes with T-Flux(®) from 19.9+7.2 mm Hg to 14.7+3.3 mm Hg (-5.2 mm Hg or -26.1%, no statistically significant difference, p >0.05). Antiglaucoma medications with either implant decreased from initially 2.0+0.8 to 0.3+0.7. A qualified success was found in 17/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 16/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). Complete success was achieved in 14/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 13/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering effect and safety of SKGEL(®) and T-Flux(®) seem to be comparable. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2687930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26879302009-05-28 SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up Schreyger, Frank Scharioth, Gabor Baatz, Holger Open Ophthalmol J Article PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare the efficacy and safety of the SKGEL(®) implant versus the T-Flux(®) implant in deep sclerectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 17 patients were identified who underwent combined phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy and implantation of SKGEL(®) in one eye and T-Flux(®) in the contralateral eye. RESULTS: In eyes with SKGEL(®) the IOP decreased from 20.6+7.3 mm Hg to 14.8+5.3 mm Hg (-5.8 mm Hg or -28.1%), and in eyes with T-Flux(®) from 19.9+7.2 mm Hg to 14.7+3.3 mm Hg (-5.2 mm Hg or -26.1%, no statistically significant difference, p >0.05). Antiglaucoma medications with either implant decreased from initially 2.0+0.8 to 0.3+0.7. A qualified success was found in 17/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 16/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). Complete success was achieved in 14/17 eyes with T-Flux(®) and in 13/17 eyes with SKGEL(®). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering effect and safety of SKGEL(®) and T-Flux(®) seem to be comparable. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2008-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2687930/ /pubmed/19478908 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057 Text en 2008 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/) which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Schreyger, Frank Scharioth, Gabor Baatz, Holger SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title | SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title_full | SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title_short | SKGEL® Implant Versus T-Flux® Implant in the Contralateral Eye in Deep Sclerectomy with Phacoemulsification: Long-Term Follow-Up |
title_sort | skgel® implant versus t-flux® implant in the contralateral eye in deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification: long-term follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478908 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364100802010057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreygerfrank skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup AT schariothgabor skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup AT baatzholger skgelimplantversustfluximplantinthecontralateraleyeindeepsclerectomywithphacoemulsificationlongtermfollowup |