Cargando…

Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution

BACKGROUND: The relationships between proteins are often asymmetric: one protein (A) depends for its function on another protein (B), but the second protein does not depend on the first. In metabolic networks there are multiple pathways that converge into one central pathway. The enzymes in the conv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Notebaart, Richard A, Kensche, Philip R, Huynen, Martijn A, Dutilh, Bas E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-r19
_version_ 1782167691862212608
author Notebaart, Richard A
Kensche, Philip R
Huynen, Martijn A
Dutilh, Bas E
author_facet Notebaart, Richard A
Kensche, Philip R
Huynen, Martijn A
Dutilh, Bas E
author_sort Notebaart, Richard A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationships between proteins are often asymmetric: one protein (A) depends for its function on another protein (B), but the second protein does not depend on the first. In metabolic networks there are multiple pathways that converge into one central pathway. The enzymes in the converging pathways depend on the enzymes in the central pathway, but the enzymes in the latter do not depend on any specific enzyme in the converging pathways. Asymmetric relations are analogous to the “if->then” logical relation where A implies B, but B does not imply A (A->B). RESULTS: We show that the majority of relationships between enzymes in metabolic flux models of metabolism in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are asymmetric. We show furthermore that these asymmetric relationships are reflected in the expression of the genes encoding those enzymes, the effect of gene knockouts and the evolution of genomes. From the asymmetric relative dependency, one would expect that the gene that is relatively independent (B) can occur without the other dependent gene (A), but not the reverse. Indeed, when only one gene of an A->B pair is expressed, is essential, is present in a genome after an evolutionary gain or loss, it tends to be the independent gene (B). This bias is strongest for genes encoding proteins whose asymmetric relationship is evolutionarily conserved. CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetric relations between proteins that arise from the system properties of metabolic networks affect gene expression, the relative effect of gene knockouts and genome evolution in a predictable manner.
format Text
id pubmed-2688278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26882782009-05-29 Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution Notebaart, Richard A Kensche, Philip R Huynen, Martijn A Dutilh, Bas E Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: The relationships between proteins are often asymmetric: one protein (A) depends for its function on another protein (B), but the second protein does not depend on the first. In metabolic networks there are multiple pathways that converge into one central pathway. The enzymes in the converging pathways depend on the enzymes in the central pathway, but the enzymes in the latter do not depend on any specific enzyme in the converging pathways. Asymmetric relations are analogous to the “if->then” logical relation where A implies B, but B does not imply A (A->B). RESULTS: We show that the majority of relationships between enzymes in metabolic flux models of metabolism in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are asymmetric. We show furthermore that these asymmetric relationships are reflected in the expression of the genes encoding those enzymes, the effect of gene knockouts and the evolution of genomes. From the asymmetric relative dependency, one would expect that the gene that is relatively independent (B) can occur without the other dependent gene (A), but not the reverse. Indeed, when only one gene of an A->B pair is expressed, is essential, is present in a genome after an evolutionary gain or loss, it tends to be the independent gene (B). This bias is strongest for genes encoding proteins whose asymmetric relationship is evolutionarily conserved. CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetric relations between proteins that arise from the system properties of metabolic networks affect gene expression, the relative effect of gene knockouts and genome evolution in a predictable manner. BioMed Central 2009 2009-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2688278/ /pubmed/19216750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-r19 Text en Copyright © 2009 Notebaart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Notebaart, Richard A
Kensche, Philip R
Huynen, Martijn A
Dutilh, Bas E
Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title_full Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title_fullStr Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title_short Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
title_sort asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-r19
work_keys_str_mv AT notebaartricharda asymmetricrelationshipsbetweenproteinsshapegenomeevolution
AT kenschephilipr asymmetricrelationshipsbetweenproteinsshapegenomeevolution
AT huynenmartijna asymmetricrelationshipsbetweenproteinsshapegenomeevolution
AT dutilhbase asymmetricrelationshipsbetweenproteinsshapegenomeevolution