Cargando…

A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments

BACKGROUND: People living in rural Australia are more likely to die in hospital following an acute myocardial infarction than those living in major cities. While several factors, including time taken to access hospital care, contribute to this risk, it is also partially attributable to the lower upt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinsman, Leigh D, Buykx, Penny, Humphreys, John S, Snow, Pamela C, Willis, Jon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19463196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-83
_version_ 1782167710552031232
author Kinsman, Leigh D
Buykx, Penny
Humphreys, John S
Snow, Pamela C
Willis, Jon
author_facet Kinsman, Leigh D
Buykx, Penny
Humphreys, John S
Snow, Pamela C
Willis, Jon
author_sort Kinsman, Leigh D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People living in rural Australia are more likely to die in hospital following an acute myocardial infarction than those living in major cities. While several factors, including time taken to access hospital care, contribute to this risk, it is also partially attributable to the lower uptake of evidence-based guidelines for the administration of thrombolytic drugs in rural emergency departments where up to one-third of eligible patients do not receive this life-saving intervention. Clinical pathways have the potential to link evidence to practice by integrating guidelines into local systems, but their impact has been hampered by variable implementation strategies and sub-optimal research designs. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a five-step clinical pathways implementation process on the timely and efficient administration of thrombolytic drugs for acute myocardial infarctions managed in rural Australian emergency departments. METHODS/DESIGN: The design is a two-arm, cluster-randomised trial with rural hospital emergency departments that treat and do not routinely transfer acute myocardial infarction patients. Six rural hospitals in the state of Victoria will participate, with three in the intervention group and three in the control group. Intervention hospitals will participate in a five-step clinical pathway implementation process: engagement of clinicians, pathway development according to local resources and systems, reminders, education, and audit and feedback. Hospitals in the control group will each receive a hard copy of Australian national guidelines for chest pain and acute myocardial infarction management. Each group will include 90 cases to give a power of 80% at 5% significance level for the two primary outcome measures: proportion of those eligible for thrombolysis receiving the drug and time to delivery of thrombolytic drug. DISCUSSION: Improved compliance with thrombolytic guidelines via clinical pathways will increase acute myocardial infarction survival rates in rural hospitals and thereby help to reduce rural-urban mortality inequalities. Such knowledge translation has the potential to be adapted for a range of clinical problems in a wide array of settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry code ACTRN12608000209392.
format Text
id pubmed-2688500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26885002009-05-30 A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments Kinsman, Leigh D Buykx, Penny Humphreys, John S Snow, Pamela C Willis, Jon BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: People living in rural Australia are more likely to die in hospital following an acute myocardial infarction than those living in major cities. While several factors, including time taken to access hospital care, contribute to this risk, it is also partially attributable to the lower uptake of evidence-based guidelines for the administration of thrombolytic drugs in rural emergency departments where up to one-third of eligible patients do not receive this life-saving intervention. Clinical pathways have the potential to link evidence to practice by integrating guidelines into local systems, but their impact has been hampered by variable implementation strategies and sub-optimal research designs. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a five-step clinical pathways implementation process on the timely and efficient administration of thrombolytic drugs for acute myocardial infarctions managed in rural Australian emergency departments. METHODS/DESIGN: The design is a two-arm, cluster-randomised trial with rural hospital emergency departments that treat and do not routinely transfer acute myocardial infarction patients. Six rural hospitals in the state of Victoria will participate, with three in the intervention group and three in the control group. Intervention hospitals will participate in a five-step clinical pathway implementation process: engagement of clinicians, pathway development according to local resources and systems, reminders, education, and audit and feedback. Hospitals in the control group will each receive a hard copy of Australian national guidelines for chest pain and acute myocardial infarction management. Each group will include 90 cases to give a power of 80% at 5% significance level for the two primary outcome measures: proportion of those eligible for thrombolysis receiving the drug and time to delivery of thrombolytic drug. DISCUSSION: Improved compliance with thrombolytic guidelines via clinical pathways will increase acute myocardial infarction survival rates in rural hospitals and thereby help to reduce rural-urban mortality inequalities. Such knowledge translation has the potential to be adapted for a range of clinical problems in a wide array of settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry code ACTRN12608000209392. BioMed Central 2009-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2688500/ /pubmed/19463196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-83 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kinsman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kinsman, Leigh D
Buykx, Penny
Humphreys, John S
Snow, Pamela C
Willis, Jon
A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title_full A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title_fullStr A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title_full_unstemmed A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title_short A cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on AMI management in rural Australian emergency departments
title_sort cluster randomised trial to assess the impact of clinical pathways on ami management in rural australian emergency departments
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19463196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-83
work_keys_str_mv AT kinsmanleighd aclusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT buykxpenny aclusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT humphreysjohns aclusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT snowpamelac aclusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT willisjon aclusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT kinsmanleighd clusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT buykxpenny clusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT humphreysjohns clusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT snowpamelac clusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments
AT willisjon clusterrandomisedtrialtoassesstheimpactofclinicalpathwaysonamimanagementinruralaustralianemergencydepartments