Cargando…

Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felton, Tim W, Sander, Rebecca, Al-Aloul, Mo, Dark, Paul, Bentley, Andrew M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77
_version_ 1782167714649866240
author Felton, Tim W
Sander, Rebecca
Al-Aloul, Mo
Dark, Paul
Bentley, Andrew M
author_facet Felton, Tim W
Sander, Rebecca
Al-Aloul, Mo
Dark, Paul
Bentley, Andrew M
author_sort Felton, Tim W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the support of seven organ systems. To create a CCMDS derived score each level of organ support was allocated a numerical value. SOFA scores were collected retrospectively from each patient in the study. Data was collected in 50 sequential admissions over the first 5 days of their admission. This generated a total of 147 pairs of data for comparison. Scatter plots and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient suggest a weak positive association between our CCMDS-derived score and the SOFA score. Daily Bland-Altman plots reveal minimal bias between the score but wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Our CCMDS-derived score cannot be regarded as an indicator of severity of organ dysfunction and cannot replace SOFA scores when a daily marker of organ dysfunction is required.
format Text
id pubmed-2688517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26885172009-05-30 Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study Felton, Tim W Sander, Rebecca Al-Aloul, Mo Dark, Paul Bentley, Andrew M BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the support of seven organ systems. To create a CCMDS derived score each level of organ support was allocated a numerical value. SOFA scores were collected retrospectively from each patient in the study. Data was collected in 50 sequential admissions over the first 5 days of their admission. This generated a total of 147 pairs of data for comparison. Scatter plots and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient suggest a weak positive association between our CCMDS-derived score and the SOFA score. Daily Bland-Altman plots reveal minimal bias between the score but wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Our CCMDS-derived score cannot be regarded as an indicator of severity of organ dysfunction and cannot replace SOFA scores when a daily marker of organ dysfunction is required. BioMed Central 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2688517/ /pubmed/19419551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77 Text en Copyright © 2009 Felton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Felton, Tim W
Sander, Rebecca
Al-Aloul, Mo
Dark, Paul
Bentley, Andrew M
Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title_full Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title_fullStr Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title_short Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
title_sort can a score derived from the critical care minimum data set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77
work_keys_str_mv AT feltontimw canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy
AT sanderrebecca canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy
AT alaloulmo canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy
AT darkpaul canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy
AT bentleyandrewm canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy