Cargando…
Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the suppo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77 |
_version_ | 1782167714649866240 |
---|---|
author | Felton, Tim W Sander, Rebecca Al-Aloul, Mo Dark, Paul Bentley, Andrew M |
author_facet | Felton, Tim W Sander, Rebecca Al-Aloul, Mo Dark, Paul Bentley, Andrew M |
author_sort | Felton, Tim W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the support of seven organ systems. To create a CCMDS derived score each level of organ support was allocated a numerical value. SOFA scores were collected retrospectively from each patient in the study. Data was collected in 50 sequential admissions over the first 5 days of their admission. This generated a total of 147 pairs of data for comparison. Scatter plots and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient suggest a weak positive association between our CCMDS-derived score and the SOFA score. Daily Bland-Altman plots reveal minimal bias between the score but wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Our CCMDS-derived score cannot be regarded as an indicator of severity of organ dysfunction and cannot replace SOFA scores when a daily marker of organ dysfunction is required. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2688517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26885172009-05-30 Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study Felton, Tim W Sander, Rebecca Al-Aloul, Mo Dark, Paul Bentley, Andrew M BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a simple organ score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set (CCMDS) to compare with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a previously validated score of organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: The CCMDS collects data regarding the support of seven organ systems. To create a CCMDS derived score each level of organ support was allocated a numerical value. SOFA scores were collected retrospectively from each patient in the study. Data was collected in 50 sequential admissions over the first 5 days of their admission. This generated a total of 147 pairs of data for comparison. Scatter plots and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient suggest a weak positive association between our CCMDS-derived score and the SOFA score. Daily Bland-Altman plots reveal minimal bias between the score but wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Our CCMDS-derived score cannot be regarded as an indicator of severity of organ dysfunction and cannot replace SOFA scores when a daily marker of organ dysfunction is required. BioMed Central 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2688517/ /pubmed/19419551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77 Text en Copyright © 2009 Felton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Felton, Tim W Sander, Rebecca Al-Aloul, Mo Dark, Paul Bentley, Andrew M Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title | Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title_full | Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title_short | Can a score derived from the Critical Care Minimum Data Set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
title_sort | can a score derived from the critical care minimum data set be used as a marker of organ dysfunction? – a pilot study |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2688517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-77 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feltontimw canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy AT sanderrebecca canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy AT alaloulmo canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy AT darkpaul canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy AT bentleyandrewm canascorederivedfromthecriticalcareminimumdatasetbeusedasamarkeroforgandysfunctionapilotstudy |