Cargando…
Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequili...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231 |
_version_ | 1782167778096054272 |
---|---|
author | Hernández-Sánchez, Jules Haley, Chris S Woolliams, John A |
author_facet | Hernández-Sánchez, Jules Haley, Chris S Woolliams, John A |
author_sort | Hernández-Sánchez, Jules |
collection | PubMed |
description | A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequilibrium (LD) generated by drift in a homogeneous population over generations. Three parameters are sufficient to describe population history: effective population size (Ne), number of generations since foundation (T), and marker allele frequencies among founders (p). IBD(L )are used in a simulation study to map a quantitative trait locus (QTL) via variance component estimation. RM is compared to a coalescent method (CM) in terms of power and robustness of QTL detection. Differences between RM and CM are small but significant. For example, RM is more powerful than CM in dioecious populations, but not in monoecious populations. Moreover, RM is more robust than CM when marker phases are unknown or when there is complete LD among founders or Ne is wrong, and less robust when p is wrong. CM utilises all marker haplotype information, whereas RM utilises information contained in each individual marker and all possible marker pairs but not in higher order interactions. RM consists of a family of models encompassing four different population structures, and two ways of using marker information, which contrasts with the single model that must cater for all possible evolutionary scenarios in CM. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2689283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26892832009-06-02 Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping Hernández-Sánchez, Jules Haley, Chris S Woolliams, John A Genet Sel Evol Research A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequilibrium (LD) generated by drift in a homogeneous population over generations. Three parameters are sufficient to describe population history: effective population size (Ne), number of generations since foundation (T), and marker allele frequencies among founders (p). IBD(L )are used in a simulation study to map a quantitative trait locus (QTL) via variance component estimation. RM is compared to a coalescent method (CM) in terms of power and robustness of QTL detection. Differences between RM and CM are small but significant. For example, RM is more powerful than CM in dioecious populations, but not in monoecious populations. Moreover, RM is more robust than CM when marker phases are unknown or when there is complete LD among founders or Ne is wrong, and less robust when p is wrong. CM utilises all marker haplotype information, whereas RM utilises information contained in each individual marker and all possible marker pairs but not in higher order interactions. RM consists of a family of models encompassing four different population structures, and two ways of using marker information, which contrasts with the single model that must cater for all possible evolutionary scenarios in CM. BioMed Central 2006-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2689283/ /pubmed/16635447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231 Text en Copyright © 2006 INRA, EDP Sciences |
spellingShingle | Research Hernández-Sánchez, Jules Haley, Chris S Woolliams, John A Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title | Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title_full | Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title_fullStr | Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title_short | Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping |
title_sort | prediction of ibd based on population history for fine gene mapping |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hernandezsanchezjules predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping AT haleychriss predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping AT woolliamsjohna predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping |