Cargando…

Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping

A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Sánchez, Jules, Haley, Chris S, Woolliams, John A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231
_version_ 1782167778096054272
author Hernández-Sánchez, Jules
Haley, Chris S
Woolliams, John A
author_facet Hernández-Sánchez, Jules
Haley, Chris S
Woolliams, John A
author_sort Hernández-Sánchez, Jules
collection PubMed
description A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequilibrium (LD) generated by drift in a homogeneous population over generations. Three parameters are sufficient to describe population history: effective population size (Ne), number of generations since foundation (T), and marker allele frequencies among founders (p). IBD(L )are used in a simulation study to map a quantitative trait locus (QTL) via variance component estimation. RM is compared to a coalescent method (CM) in terms of power and robustness of QTL detection. Differences between RM and CM are small but significant. For example, RM is more powerful than CM in dioecious populations, but not in monoecious populations. Moreover, RM is more robust than CM when marker phases are unknown or when there is complete LD among founders or Ne is wrong, and less robust when p is wrong. CM utilises all marker haplotype information, whereas RM utilises information contained in each individual marker and all possible marker pairs but not in higher order interactions. RM consists of a family of models encompassing four different population structures, and two ways of using marker information, which contrasts with the single model that must cater for all possible evolutionary scenarios in CM.
format Text
id pubmed-2689283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26892832009-06-02 Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping Hernández-Sánchez, Jules Haley, Chris S Woolliams, John A Genet Sel Evol Research A novel multiple regression method (RM) is developed to predict identity-by-descent probabilities at a locus L (IBD(L)), among individuals without pedigree, given information on surrounding markers and population history. These IBD(L )probabilities are a function of the increase in linkage disequilibrium (LD) generated by drift in a homogeneous population over generations. Three parameters are sufficient to describe population history: effective population size (Ne), number of generations since foundation (T), and marker allele frequencies among founders (p). IBD(L )are used in a simulation study to map a quantitative trait locus (QTL) via variance component estimation. RM is compared to a coalescent method (CM) in terms of power and robustness of QTL detection. Differences between RM and CM are small but significant. For example, RM is more powerful than CM in dioecious populations, but not in monoecious populations. Moreover, RM is more robust than CM when marker phases are unknown or when there is complete LD among founders or Ne is wrong, and less robust when p is wrong. CM utilises all marker haplotype information, whereas RM utilises information contained in each individual marker and all possible marker pairs but not in higher order interactions. RM consists of a family of models encompassing four different population structures, and two ways of using marker information, which contrasts with the single model that must cater for all possible evolutionary scenarios in CM. BioMed Central 2006-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2689283/ /pubmed/16635447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231 Text en Copyright © 2006 INRA, EDP Sciences
spellingShingle Research
Hernández-Sánchez, Jules
Haley, Chris S
Woolliams, John A
Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title_full Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title_fullStr Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title_short Prediction of IBD based on population history for fine gene mapping
title_sort prediction of ibd based on population history for fine gene mapping
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-38-3-231
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezsanchezjules predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping
AT haleychriss predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping
AT woolliamsjohna predictionofibdbasedonpopulationhistoryforfinegenemapping