Cargando…

Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems

Extracorporeal lung-supporting procedures open the possibility of staying within widely accepted margins of 'protective' mechanical ventilation (tidal volume of less than 6 mL per kg of predicted ideal body weight and plateau pressure of less than 30 cm H(2)O) in most any case of respirato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintel, Michael, Moerer, Onnen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19435467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7738
_version_ 1782167796876050432
author Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
author_facet Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
author_sort Quintel, Michael
collection PubMed
description Extracorporeal lung-supporting procedures open the possibility of staying within widely accepted margins of 'protective' mechanical ventilation (tidal volume of less than 6 mL per kg of predicted ideal body weight and plateau pressure of less than 30 cm H(2)O) in most any case of respiratory failure or even of further reducing ventilator settings while still providing adequate gas exchange. There is evidence that, at least in some patients, a further reduction in tidal volumes might be beneficial. Extracorporeal procedures to support the lungs have undergone tremendous technical developments, thus reducing the procedure-related risks. However, what is true for ventilator settings should also be true for extracorporeal procedures: studies will have to demonstrate a convincing risk-benefit ratio. In addition, a simple reduction of the tidal volume will certainly not be the right answer. If extracorporeal support largely influences gas exchange, the 'optimal' tidal volume/positive end-expiratory pressure ratio keeping stress and strain low and avoiding alveolar derecruitment will still have to be individually defined.
format Text
id pubmed-2689463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26894632010-03-30 Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Crit Care Commentary Extracorporeal lung-supporting procedures open the possibility of staying within widely accepted margins of 'protective' mechanical ventilation (tidal volume of less than 6 mL per kg of predicted ideal body weight and plateau pressure of less than 30 cm H(2)O) in most any case of respiratory failure or even of further reducing ventilator settings while still providing adequate gas exchange. There is evidence that, at least in some patients, a further reduction in tidal volumes might be beneficial. Extracorporeal procedures to support the lungs have undergone tremendous technical developments, thus reducing the procedure-related risks. However, what is true for ventilator settings should also be true for extracorporeal procedures: studies will have to demonstrate a convincing risk-benefit ratio. In addition, a simple reduction of the tidal volume will certainly not be the right answer. If extracorporeal support largely influences gas exchange, the 'optimal' tidal volume/positive end-expiratory pressure ratio keeping stress and strain low and avoiding alveolar derecruitment will still have to be individually defined. BioMed Central 2009 2009-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2689463/ /pubmed/19435467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7738 Text en Copyright © 2009 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title_full Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title_fullStr Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title_full_unstemmed Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title_short Is smaller high enough? Another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
title_sort is smaller high enough? another piece in the puzzle of stress, strain, size, and systems
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19435467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7738
work_keys_str_mv AT quintelmichael issmallerhighenoughanotherpieceinthepuzzleofstressstrainsizeandsystems
AT moereronnen issmallerhighenoughanotherpieceinthepuzzleofstressstrainsizeandsystems