Cargando…

Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION: In lung cancer surgery, large tidal volume and elevated inspiratory pressure are known risk factors of acute lung (ALI). Mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume has been shown to attenuate lung injuries in critically ill patients. In the current study, we assessed the impact of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licker, Marc, Diaper, John, Villiger, Yann, Spiliopoulos, Anastase, Licker, Virginie, Robert, John, Tschopp, Jean-Marie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19317902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7762
_version_ 1782167802089570304
author Licker, Marc
Diaper, John
Villiger, Yann
Spiliopoulos, Anastase
Licker, Virginie
Robert, John
Tschopp, Jean-Marie
author_facet Licker, Marc
Diaper, John
Villiger, Yann
Spiliopoulos, Anastase
Licker, Virginie
Robert, John
Tschopp, Jean-Marie
author_sort Licker, Marc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In lung cancer surgery, large tidal volume and elevated inspiratory pressure are known risk factors of acute lung (ALI). Mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume has been shown to attenuate lung injuries in critically ill patients. In the current study, we assessed the impact of a protective lung ventilation (PLV) protocol in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of an observational cohort. Demographic, surgical, clinical and outcome data were prospectively collected over a 10-year period. The PLV protocol consisted of small tidal volume, limiting maximal pressure ventilation and adding end-expiratory positive pressure along with recruitment maneuvers. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was performed and data were compared before and after implementation of the PLV protocol: from 1998 to 2003 (historical group, n = 533) and from 2003 to 2008 (protocol group, n = 558). RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two cohorts, except for a higher cardiovascular risk profile in the intervention group. During one-lung ventilation, protocol-managed patients had lower tidal volume (5.3 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2 ml/kg in historical controls, P = 0.013) and higher dynamic compliance (45 ± 8 vs. 32 ± 7 ml/cmH(2)O, P = 0.011). After implementing PLV, there was a decreased incidence of acute lung injury (from 3.7% to 0.9%, P < 0.01) and atelectasis (from 8.8 to 5.0, P = 0.018), fewer admissions to the intensive care unit (from 9.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (from 14.5 ± 3.3 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1, P < 0.01). When adjusted for baseline characteristics, implementation of the open-lung protocol was associated with a reduced risk of acute lung injury (adjusted odds ratio of 0.34 with 95% confidence interval of 0.23 to 0.75; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an intraoperative PLV protocol in patients undergoing lung cancer resection was associated with improved postoperative respiratory outcomes as evidence by significantly reduced incidences of acute lung injury and atelectasis along with reduced utilization of intensive care unit resources.
format Text
id pubmed-2689485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26894852009-06-02 Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery Licker, Marc Diaper, John Villiger, Yann Spiliopoulos, Anastase Licker, Virginie Robert, John Tschopp, Jean-Marie Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In lung cancer surgery, large tidal volume and elevated inspiratory pressure are known risk factors of acute lung (ALI). Mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume has been shown to attenuate lung injuries in critically ill patients. In the current study, we assessed the impact of a protective lung ventilation (PLV) protocol in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of an observational cohort. Demographic, surgical, clinical and outcome data were prospectively collected over a 10-year period. The PLV protocol consisted of small tidal volume, limiting maximal pressure ventilation and adding end-expiratory positive pressure along with recruitment maneuvers. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was performed and data were compared before and after implementation of the PLV protocol: from 1998 to 2003 (historical group, n = 533) and from 2003 to 2008 (protocol group, n = 558). RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two cohorts, except for a higher cardiovascular risk profile in the intervention group. During one-lung ventilation, protocol-managed patients had lower tidal volume (5.3 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2 ml/kg in historical controls, P = 0.013) and higher dynamic compliance (45 ± 8 vs. 32 ± 7 ml/cmH(2)O, P = 0.011). After implementing PLV, there was a decreased incidence of acute lung injury (from 3.7% to 0.9%, P < 0.01) and atelectasis (from 8.8 to 5.0, P = 0.018), fewer admissions to the intensive care unit (from 9.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (from 14.5 ± 3.3 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1, P < 0.01). When adjusted for baseline characteristics, implementation of the open-lung protocol was associated with a reduced risk of acute lung injury (adjusted odds ratio of 0.34 with 95% confidence interval of 0.23 to 0.75; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an intraoperative PLV protocol in patients undergoing lung cancer resection was associated with improved postoperative respiratory outcomes as evidence by significantly reduced incidences of acute lung injury and atelectasis along with reduced utilization of intensive care unit resources. BioMed Central 2009 2009-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2689485/ /pubmed/19317902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7762 Text en Copyright © 2009 Licker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Licker, Marc
Diaper, John
Villiger, Yann
Spiliopoulos, Anastase
Licker, Virginie
Robert, John
Tschopp, Jean-Marie
Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title_full Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title_fullStr Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title_short Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
title_sort impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19317902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7762
work_keys_str_mv AT lickermarc impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT diaperjohn impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT villigeryann impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT spiliopoulosanastase impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT lickervirginie impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT robertjohn impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery
AT tschoppjeanmarie impactofintraoperativelungprotectiveinterventionsinpatientsundergoinglungcancersurgery