Cargando…

A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solsona, José F, Díaz, Yolanda, Vázquez, Antonia, Pilar Gracia, Maria, Zapatero, Ana, Marrugat, Jaume
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783
_version_ 1782167806430674944
author Solsona, José F
Díaz, Yolanda
Vázquez, Antonia
Pilar Gracia, Maria
Zapatero, Ana
Marrugat, Jaume
author_facet Solsona, José F
Díaz, Yolanda
Vázquez, Antonia
Pilar Gracia, Maria
Zapatero, Ana
Marrugat, Jaume
author_sort Solsona, José F
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included all non-tracheostomised patients with improvement of the underlying cause of acute respiratory failure, and those with no need for vasoactive or sedative drugs were eligible. Patients fulfilling the Consensus Conference on Weaning extubation criteria after 120 minutes spontaneous breathing (n = 152) were included. To the endotracheal tube, 100 cc dead space was added for 30 minutes. Patients tolerating the test were extubated; those not tolerating it received six hours of supplementary ventilation before extubation. The measurements taken and main results were: arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and signs of respiratory insufficiency were recorded every five minutes; and arterial blood gases were measured at the beginning and end of the test. Extubation failure was defined as the need for mechanical and non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours of extubation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14.5%) experienced extubation failure. Only intercostal retraction was independently associated with extubation failure. The sensitivity (40.9%) and specificity (97.7%) yield a probability of extubation failure of 75.1% for patients not tolerating the test versus 9.3% for those tolerating it. CONCLUSIONS: Observing intercostal retraction after adding dead space may help detect susceptibility to extubation failure. The ideal amount of dead space remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76206152.
format Text
id pubmed-2689503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26895032009-06-02 A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure Solsona, José F Díaz, Yolanda Vázquez, Antonia Pilar Gracia, Maria Zapatero, Ana Marrugat, Jaume Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included all non-tracheostomised patients with improvement of the underlying cause of acute respiratory failure, and those with no need for vasoactive or sedative drugs were eligible. Patients fulfilling the Consensus Conference on Weaning extubation criteria after 120 minutes spontaneous breathing (n = 152) were included. To the endotracheal tube, 100 cc dead space was added for 30 minutes. Patients tolerating the test were extubated; those not tolerating it received six hours of supplementary ventilation before extubation. The measurements taken and main results were: arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and signs of respiratory insufficiency were recorded every five minutes; and arterial blood gases were measured at the beginning and end of the test. Extubation failure was defined as the need for mechanical and non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours of extubation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14.5%) experienced extubation failure. Only intercostal retraction was independently associated with extubation failure. The sensitivity (40.9%) and specificity (97.7%) yield a probability of extubation failure of 75.1% for patients not tolerating the test versus 9.3% for those tolerating it. CONCLUSIONS: Observing intercostal retraction after adding dead space may help detect susceptibility to extubation failure. The ideal amount of dead space remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76206152. BioMed Central 2009 2009-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2689503/ /pubmed/19366440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783 Text en Copyright © 2009 Solsona et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Solsona, José F
Díaz, Yolanda
Vázquez, Antonia
Pilar Gracia, Maria
Zapatero, Ana
Marrugat, Jaume
A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title_full A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title_fullStr A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title_short A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
title_sort pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783
work_keys_str_mv AT solsonajosef apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT diazyolanda apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT vazquezantonia apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT pilargraciamaria apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT zapateroana apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT marrugatjaume apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT solsonajosef pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT diazyolanda pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT vazquezantonia pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT pilargraciamaria pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT zapateroana pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure
AT marrugatjaume pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure