Cargando…
A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure
INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783 |
_version_ | 1782167806430674944 |
---|---|
author | Solsona, José F Díaz, Yolanda Vázquez, Antonia Pilar Gracia, Maria Zapatero, Ana Marrugat, Jaume |
author_facet | Solsona, José F Díaz, Yolanda Vázquez, Antonia Pilar Gracia, Maria Zapatero, Ana Marrugat, Jaume |
author_sort | Solsona, José F |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included all non-tracheostomised patients with improvement of the underlying cause of acute respiratory failure, and those with no need for vasoactive or sedative drugs were eligible. Patients fulfilling the Consensus Conference on Weaning extubation criteria after 120 minutes spontaneous breathing (n = 152) were included. To the endotracheal tube, 100 cc dead space was added for 30 minutes. Patients tolerating the test were extubated; those not tolerating it received six hours of supplementary ventilation before extubation. The measurements taken and main results were: arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and signs of respiratory insufficiency were recorded every five minutes; and arterial blood gases were measured at the beginning and end of the test. Extubation failure was defined as the need for mechanical and non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours of extubation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14.5%) experienced extubation failure. Only intercostal retraction was independently associated with extubation failure. The sensitivity (40.9%) and specificity (97.7%) yield a probability of extubation failure of 75.1% for patients not tolerating the test versus 9.3% for those tolerating it. CONCLUSIONS: Observing intercostal retraction after adding dead space may help detect susceptibility to extubation failure. The ideal amount of dead space remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76206152. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2689503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26895032009-06-02 A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure Solsona, José F Díaz, Yolanda Vázquez, Antonia Pilar Gracia, Maria Zapatero, Ana Marrugat, Jaume Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: To determine whether subjecting patients to 100 ml of additional dead space after a 120-minute weaning trial could predict readiness for extubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised pilot study in an intensive care unit at a university hospital with 14 beds. It included all non-tracheostomised patients with improvement of the underlying cause of acute respiratory failure, and those with no need for vasoactive or sedative drugs were eligible. Patients fulfilling the Consensus Conference on Weaning extubation criteria after 120 minutes spontaneous breathing (n = 152) were included. To the endotracheal tube, 100 cc dead space was added for 30 minutes. Patients tolerating the test were extubated; those not tolerating it received six hours of supplementary ventilation before extubation. The measurements taken and main results were: arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and signs of respiratory insufficiency were recorded every five minutes; and arterial blood gases were measured at the beginning and end of the test. Extubation failure was defined as the need for mechanical and non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours of extubation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14.5%) experienced extubation failure. Only intercostal retraction was independently associated with extubation failure. The sensitivity (40.9%) and specificity (97.7%) yield a probability of extubation failure of 75.1% for patients not tolerating the test versus 9.3% for those tolerating it. CONCLUSIONS: Observing intercostal retraction after adding dead space may help detect susceptibility to extubation failure. The ideal amount of dead space remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76206152. BioMed Central 2009 2009-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2689503/ /pubmed/19366440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783 Text en Copyright © 2009 Solsona et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Solsona, José F Díaz, Yolanda Vázquez, Antonia Pilar Gracia, Maria Zapatero, Ana Marrugat, Jaume A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title | A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title_full | A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title_fullStr | A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title_short | A pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
title_sort | pilot study of a new test to predict extubation failure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solsonajosef apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT diazyolanda apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT vazquezantonia apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT pilargraciamaria apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT zapateroana apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT marrugatjaume apilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT solsonajosef pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT diazyolanda pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT vazquezantonia pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT pilargraciamaria pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT zapateroana pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure AT marrugatjaume pilotstudyofanewtesttopredictextubationfailure |