Cargando…

A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis

Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thaver, Durrane, Zaidi, Anita K M, Critchley, Julia, Azmatullah, Asma, Madni, Syed Ali, Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19493939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865
_version_ 1782167842817310720
author Thaver, Durrane
Zaidi, Anita K M
Critchley, Julia
Azmatullah, Asma
Madni, Syed Ali
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
author_facet Thaver, Durrane
Zaidi, Anita K M
Critchley, Julia
Azmatullah, Asma
Madni, Syed Ali
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
author_sort Thaver, Durrane
collection PubMed
description Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL (issue 4, 2007), Medline (1966-2007), Embase (1974-2007), LILACS (1982-2007), selected conferences, reference lists, and ongoing trial register (November 2007). Review methods Trials comparing fluoroquinolones with chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, or azithromycin in culture-proven enteric fever were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Trials recruiting over 60% children were analysed separately from trials on adults. Primary outcomes studied were clinical failure, microbiological failure, and relapse. Results Twenty trials were included. Trials were small and often of limited methodological quality. Only 10 trials concealed allocation and only three were blinded. In trials on adults, fluoroquinolones were not significantly different from chloramphenicol for clinical failure (594 participants) or microbiological failure (n=378), but reduced clinical relapse (odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.50), n=467, 6 trials). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were comparable (n=152, 2 trials). Compared with ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.08 (0.01 to 0.45), n=120, 3 trials) but not microbiological failure or relapse. Compared with cefixime, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.05 (0.01 to 0.24), n=238, 2 trials) and relapse (0.18 (0.03 to 0.91), n=218, 2 trials). In trials on children infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, older fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin) produced more clinical failures than azithromycin (2.67 (1.16 to 6.11), n=125, 1 trial), but there were no differences with newer fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, n=285, 1 trial). Fluoroquinolones and cefixime were not significantly different (n=82, 1 trial). Conclusions In adults, fluoroquinolones may be better than chloramphenicol for preventing clinical relapse. Data were limited for other comparisons, particularly for children.
format Text
id pubmed-2690620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26906202009-06-04 A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis Thaver, Durrane Zaidi, Anita K M Critchley, Julia Azmatullah, Asma Madni, Syed Ali Bhutta, Zulfiqar A BMJ Research Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL (issue 4, 2007), Medline (1966-2007), Embase (1974-2007), LILACS (1982-2007), selected conferences, reference lists, and ongoing trial register (November 2007). Review methods Trials comparing fluoroquinolones with chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, or azithromycin in culture-proven enteric fever were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Trials recruiting over 60% children were analysed separately from trials on adults. Primary outcomes studied were clinical failure, microbiological failure, and relapse. Results Twenty trials were included. Trials were small and often of limited methodological quality. Only 10 trials concealed allocation and only three were blinded. In trials on adults, fluoroquinolones were not significantly different from chloramphenicol for clinical failure (594 participants) or microbiological failure (n=378), but reduced clinical relapse (odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.50), n=467, 6 trials). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were comparable (n=152, 2 trials). Compared with ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.08 (0.01 to 0.45), n=120, 3 trials) but not microbiological failure or relapse. Compared with cefixime, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.05 (0.01 to 0.24), n=238, 2 trials) and relapse (0.18 (0.03 to 0.91), n=218, 2 trials). In trials on children infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, older fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin) produced more clinical failures than azithromycin (2.67 (1.16 to 6.11), n=125, 1 trial), but there were no differences with newer fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, n=285, 1 trial). Fluoroquinolones and cefixime were not significantly different (n=82, 1 trial). Conclusions In adults, fluoroquinolones may be better than chloramphenicol for preventing clinical relapse. Data were limited for other comparisons, particularly for children. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2690620/ /pubmed/19493939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865 Text en © Thaver et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Thaver, Durrane
Zaidi, Anita K M
Critchley, Julia
Azmatullah, Asma
Madni, Syed Ali
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A
A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19493939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865
work_keys_str_mv AT thaverdurrane acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT zaidianitakm acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT critchleyjulia acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT azmatullahasma acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT madnisyedali acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT bhuttazulfiqara acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT thaverdurrane comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT zaidianitakm comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT critchleyjulia comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT azmatullahasma comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT madnisyedali comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis
AT bhuttazulfiqara comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis