Cargando…
A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19493939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865 |
_version_ | 1782167842817310720 |
---|---|
author | Thaver, Durrane Zaidi, Anita K M Critchley, Julia Azmatullah, Asma Madni, Syed Ali Bhutta, Zulfiqar A |
author_facet | Thaver, Durrane Zaidi, Anita K M Critchley, Julia Azmatullah, Asma Madni, Syed Ali Bhutta, Zulfiqar A |
author_sort | Thaver, Durrane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL (issue 4, 2007), Medline (1966-2007), Embase (1974-2007), LILACS (1982-2007), selected conferences, reference lists, and ongoing trial register (November 2007). Review methods Trials comparing fluoroquinolones with chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, or azithromycin in culture-proven enteric fever were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Trials recruiting over 60% children were analysed separately from trials on adults. Primary outcomes studied were clinical failure, microbiological failure, and relapse. Results Twenty trials were included. Trials were small and often of limited methodological quality. Only 10 trials concealed allocation and only three were blinded. In trials on adults, fluoroquinolones were not significantly different from chloramphenicol for clinical failure (594 participants) or microbiological failure (n=378), but reduced clinical relapse (odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.50), n=467, 6 trials). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were comparable (n=152, 2 trials). Compared with ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.08 (0.01 to 0.45), n=120, 3 trials) but not microbiological failure or relapse. Compared with cefixime, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.05 (0.01 to 0.24), n=238, 2 trials) and relapse (0.18 (0.03 to 0.91), n=218, 2 trials). In trials on children infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, older fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin) produced more clinical failures than azithromycin (2.67 (1.16 to 6.11), n=125, 1 trial), but there were no differences with newer fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, n=285, 1 trial). Fluoroquinolones and cefixime were not significantly different (n=82, 1 trial). Conclusions In adults, fluoroquinolones may be better than chloramphenicol for preventing clinical relapse. Data were limited for other comparisons, particularly for children. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2690620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26906202009-06-04 A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis Thaver, Durrane Zaidi, Anita K M Critchley, Julia Azmatullah, Asma Madni, Syed Ali Bhutta, Zulfiqar A BMJ Research Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever). Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL (issue 4, 2007), Medline (1966-2007), Embase (1974-2007), LILACS (1982-2007), selected conferences, reference lists, and ongoing trial register (November 2007). Review methods Trials comparing fluoroquinolones with chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, or azithromycin in culture-proven enteric fever were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Trials recruiting over 60% children were analysed separately from trials on adults. Primary outcomes studied were clinical failure, microbiological failure, and relapse. Results Twenty trials were included. Trials were small and often of limited methodological quality. Only 10 trials concealed allocation and only three were blinded. In trials on adults, fluoroquinolones were not significantly different from chloramphenicol for clinical failure (594 participants) or microbiological failure (n=378), but reduced clinical relapse (odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.50), n=467, 6 trials). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were comparable (n=152, 2 trials). Compared with ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.08 (0.01 to 0.45), n=120, 3 trials) but not microbiological failure or relapse. Compared with cefixime, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.05 (0.01 to 0.24), n=238, 2 trials) and relapse (0.18 (0.03 to 0.91), n=218, 2 trials). In trials on children infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, older fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin) produced more clinical failures than azithromycin (2.67 (1.16 to 6.11), n=125, 1 trial), but there were no differences with newer fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, n=285, 1 trial). Fluoroquinolones and cefixime were not significantly different (n=82, 1 trial). Conclusions In adults, fluoroquinolones may be better than chloramphenicol for preventing clinical relapse. Data were limited for other comparisons, particularly for children. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2690620/ /pubmed/19493939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865 Text en © Thaver et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Thaver, Durrane Zaidi, Anita K M Critchley, Julia Azmatullah, Asma Madni, Syed Ali Bhutta, Zulfiqar A A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title | A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title_full | A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title_short | A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19493939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thaverdurrane acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT zaidianitakm acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT critchleyjulia acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT azmatullahasma acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT madnisyedali acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT bhuttazulfiqara acomparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT thaverdurrane comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT zaidianitakm comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT critchleyjulia comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT azmatullahasma comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT madnisyedali comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis AT bhuttazulfiqara comparisonoffluoroquinolonesversusotherantibioticsfortreatingentericfevermetaanalysis |