Cargando…

A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hakvoort, R. A., Burger, M. P., Emanuel, M. H., Roovers, J. P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19495543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0847-4
_version_ 1782167852052119552
author Hakvoort, R. A.
Burger, M. P.
Emanuel, M. H.
Roovers, J. P.
author_facet Hakvoort, R. A.
Burger, M. P.
Emanuel, M. H.
Roovers, J. P.
author_sort Hakvoort, R. A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (PVR) volume implying suboptimal treatment for certain subgroups. METHODS: Nationwide questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS: Post-operatively, 77% performed transurethral indwelling catheterisation, 12% suprapubic catheterisation and 11% intermittent catheterisation. Catheterisation was applied 3 days (1–7 days) following anterior repair and 1 day (1–3 days) following all other procedures. The median cut-off point for abnormal PVR was 150 mL (range 50–250 mL). Treatment of abnormal PVR consisted mostly of prolonging transurethral indwelling catheterisation for 2 days (range 1–5 days; 57%), 29% by intermittent and 12% by suprapubic catheterisation. Antibiotics were administered by 21% either routinely or based on symptoms only. CONCLUSIONS: Due to insufficient evidence and suboptimal implementation of available evidence, practice variation in catheterisation regimens is high.
format Text
id pubmed-2690835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26908352009-06-05 A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery Hakvoort, R. A. Burger, M. P. Emanuel, M. H. Roovers, J. P. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (PVR) volume implying suboptimal treatment for certain subgroups. METHODS: Nationwide questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS: Post-operatively, 77% performed transurethral indwelling catheterisation, 12% suprapubic catheterisation and 11% intermittent catheterisation. Catheterisation was applied 3 days (1–7 days) following anterior repair and 1 day (1–3 days) following all other procedures. The median cut-off point for abnormal PVR was 150 mL (range 50–250 mL). Treatment of abnormal PVR consisted mostly of prolonging transurethral indwelling catheterisation for 2 days (range 1–5 days; 57%), 29% by intermittent and 12% by suprapubic catheterisation. Antibiotics were administered by 21% either routinely or based on symptoms only. CONCLUSIONS: Due to insufficient evidence and suboptimal implementation of available evidence, practice variation in catheterisation regimens is high. Springer-Verlag 2009-03-10 2009-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2690835/ /pubmed/19495543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0847-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2009
spellingShingle Original Article
Hakvoort, R. A.
Burger, M. P.
Emanuel, M. H.
Roovers, J. P.
A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title_full A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title_fullStr A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title_full_unstemmed A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title_short A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
title_sort nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19495543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0847-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hakvoortra anationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT burgermp anationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT emanuelmh anationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT rooversjp anationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT hakvoortra nationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT burgermp nationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT emanuelmh nationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery
AT rooversjp nationwidesurveytomeasurepracticevariationofcatheterisationmanagementinpatientsundergoingvaginalprolapsesurgery