Cargando…

Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies

BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are currently being utilized for targeted sequencing of candidate genes or genomic intervals to perform sequence-based association studies. To evaluate these platforms for this application, we analyzed human sequence generated by the Roche 454,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harismendy, Olivier, Ng, Pauline C, Strausberg, Robert L, Wang, Xiaoyun, Stockwell, Timothy B, Beeson, Karen Y, Schork, Nicholas J, Murray, Sarah S, Topol, Eric J, Levy, Samuel, Frazer, Kelly A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19327155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r32
_version_ 1782167865361694720
author Harismendy, Olivier
Ng, Pauline C
Strausberg, Robert L
Wang, Xiaoyun
Stockwell, Timothy B
Beeson, Karen Y
Schork, Nicholas J
Murray, Sarah S
Topol, Eric J
Levy, Samuel
Frazer, Kelly A
author_facet Harismendy, Olivier
Ng, Pauline C
Strausberg, Robert L
Wang, Xiaoyun
Stockwell, Timothy B
Beeson, Karen Y
Schork, Nicholas J
Murray, Sarah S
Topol, Eric J
Levy, Samuel
Frazer, Kelly A
author_sort Harismendy, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are currently being utilized for targeted sequencing of candidate genes or genomic intervals to perform sequence-based association studies. To evaluate these platforms for this application, we analyzed human sequence generated by the Roche 454, Illumina GA, and the ABI SOLiD technologies for the same 260 kb in four individuals. RESULTS: Local sequence characteristics contribute to systematic variability in sequence coverage (>100-fold difference in per-base coverage), resulting in patterns for each NGS technology that are highly correlated between samples. A comparison of the base calls to 88 kb of overlapping ABI 3730xL Sanger sequence generated for the same samples showed that the NGS platforms all have high sensitivity, identifying >95% of variant sites. At high coverage, depth base calling errors are systematic, resulting from local sequence contexts; as the coverage is lowered additional 'random sampling' errors in base calling occur. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides important insights into systematic biases and data variability that need to be considered when utilizing NGS platforms for population targeted sequencing studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2691003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26910032009-06-04 Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies Harismendy, Olivier Ng, Pauline C Strausberg, Robert L Wang, Xiaoyun Stockwell, Timothy B Beeson, Karen Y Schork, Nicholas J Murray, Sarah S Topol, Eric J Levy, Samuel Frazer, Kelly A Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are currently being utilized for targeted sequencing of candidate genes or genomic intervals to perform sequence-based association studies. To evaluate these platforms for this application, we analyzed human sequence generated by the Roche 454, Illumina GA, and the ABI SOLiD technologies for the same 260 kb in four individuals. RESULTS: Local sequence characteristics contribute to systematic variability in sequence coverage (>100-fold difference in per-base coverage), resulting in patterns for each NGS technology that are highly correlated between samples. A comparison of the base calls to 88 kb of overlapping ABI 3730xL Sanger sequence generated for the same samples showed that the NGS platforms all have high sensitivity, identifying >95% of variant sites. At high coverage, depth base calling errors are systematic, resulting from local sequence contexts; as the coverage is lowered additional 'random sampling' errors in base calling occur. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides important insights into systematic biases and data variability that need to be considered when utilizing NGS platforms for population targeted sequencing studies. BioMed Central 2009 2009-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2691003/ /pubmed/19327155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r32 Text en Copyright © 2009 Harismendy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Harismendy, Olivier
Ng, Pauline C
Strausberg, Robert L
Wang, Xiaoyun
Stockwell, Timothy B
Beeson, Karen Y
Schork, Nicholas J
Murray, Sarah S
Topol, Eric J
Levy, Samuel
Frazer, Kelly A
Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title_full Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title_short Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
title_sort evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19327155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r32
work_keys_str_mv AT harismendyolivier evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT ngpaulinec evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT strausbergrobertl evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT wangxiaoyun evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT stockwelltimothyb evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT beesonkareny evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT schorknicholasj evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT murraysarahs evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT topolericj evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT levysamuel evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies
AT frazerkellya evaluationofnextgenerationsequencingplatformsforpopulationtargetedsequencingstudies