Cargando…
Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination
BACKGROUND: The "common disease – common variant" hypothesis and genome-wide association studies have achieved numerous successes in the last three years, particularly in genetic mapping in human diseases. Nevertheless, the power of the association study methods are still low, in particula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19379528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-115 |
_version_ | 1782167899417346048 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Zhipeng Sabaa, Hadi Wang, Yining Goebel, Randy Wang, Zhiquan Xu, Jiaofen Stothard, Paul Lin, Guohui |
author_facet | Cai, Zhipeng Sabaa, Hadi Wang, Yining Goebel, Randy Wang, Zhiquan Xu, Jiaofen Stothard, Paul Lin, Guohui |
author_sort | Cai, Zhipeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The "common disease – common variant" hypothesis and genome-wide association studies have achieved numerous successes in the last three years, particularly in genetic mapping in human diseases. Nevertheless, the power of the association study methods are still low, in particular on quantitative traits, and the description of the full allelic spectrum is deemed still far from reach. Given increasing density of single nucleotide polymorphisms available and suggested by the block-like structure of the human genome, a popular and prosperous strategy is to use haplotypes to try to capture the correlation structure of SNPs in regions of little recombination. The key to the success of this strategy is thus the ability to unambiguously determine the haplotype allele sharing status among the members. The association studies based on haplotype sharing status would have significantly reduced degrees of freedom and be able to capture the combined effects of tightly linked causal variants. RESULTS: For pedigree genotype datasets of medium density of SNPs, we present two methods for haplotype allele sharing status determination among the pedigree members. Extensive simulation study showed that both methods performed nearly perfectly on breakpoint discovery, mutation haplotype allele discovery, and shared chromosomal region discovery. CONCLUSION: For pedigree genotype datasets, the haplotype allele sharing status among the members can be deterministically, efficiently, and accurately determined, even for very small pedigrees. Given their excellent performance, the presented haplotype allele sharing status determination programs can be useful in many downstream applications including haplotype based association studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2691739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26917392009-06-06 Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination Cai, Zhipeng Sabaa, Hadi Wang, Yining Goebel, Randy Wang, Zhiquan Xu, Jiaofen Stothard, Paul Lin, Guohui BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: The "common disease – common variant" hypothesis and genome-wide association studies have achieved numerous successes in the last three years, particularly in genetic mapping in human diseases. Nevertheless, the power of the association study methods are still low, in particular on quantitative traits, and the description of the full allelic spectrum is deemed still far from reach. Given increasing density of single nucleotide polymorphisms available and suggested by the block-like structure of the human genome, a popular and prosperous strategy is to use haplotypes to try to capture the correlation structure of SNPs in regions of little recombination. The key to the success of this strategy is thus the ability to unambiguously determine the haplotype allele sharing status among the members. The association studies based on haplotype sharing status would have significantly reduced degrees of freedom and be able to capture the combined effects of tightly linked causal variants. RESULTS: For pedigree genotype datasets of medium density of SNPs, we present two methods for haplotype allele sharing status determination among the pedigree members. Extensive simulation study showed that both methods performed nearly perfectly on breakpoint discovery, mutation haplotype allele discovery, and shared chromosomal region discovery. CONCLUSION: For pedigree genotype datasets, the haplotype allele sharing status among the members can be deterministically, efficiently, and accurately determined, even for very small pedigrees. Given their excellent performance, the presented haplotype allele sharing status determination programs can be useful in many downstream applications including haplotype based association studies. BioMed Central 2009-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2691739/ /pubmed/19379528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-115 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cai, Zhipeng Sabaa, Hadi Wang, Yining Goebel, Randy Wang, Zhiquan Xu, Jiaofen Stothard, Paul Lin, Guohui Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title | Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title_full | Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title_fullStr | Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title_full_unstemmed | Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title_short | Most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
title_sort | most parsimonious haplotype allele sharing determination |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19379528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caizhipeng mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT sabaahadi mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT wangyining mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT goebelrandy mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT wangzhiquan mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT xujiaofen mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT stothardpaul mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination AT linguohui mostparsimonioushaplotypeallelesharingdetermination |