Cargando…
Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11 |
_version_ | 1782167955702808576 |
---|---|
author | Scheckner, Bari Peyser, Alexandra Rube, Jacob Tarapore, Freya Frank, Rachel Vento, Suzanne Hoffman, Cathy Valderrama, Elsa Charney, Douglas Goilav, Beatrice Trachtman, Howard |
author_facet | Scheckner, Bari Peyser, Alexandra Rube, Jacob Tarapore, Freya Frank, Rachel Vento, Suzanne Hoffman, Cathy Valderrama, Elsa Charney, Douglas Goilav, Beatrice Trachtman, Howard |
author_sort | Scheckner, Bari |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center chart review was performed to test the hypothesis that at least 80% of native kidney biopsies provide clinically valuable information that rationally guides diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: 200 biopsies performed between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2008 were reviewed. A scheme composed of six categories was devised to classify the utility of each kidney biopsy. RESULTS: 196 complete case files were available for review. Twenty-four (12.2%) biopsies did not shed light on the diagnosis and were unhelpful in patient management – 21 biopsies (10.7%) were non-diagnostic and 3 (1.5%) failed to yield enough tissue for examination. The number of unhelpful biopsies did not cluster in any specific disease entity. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide guidance to nephrologists about the total risk of a kidney biopsy, including uninformative results, when seeking informed consent for the procedure. The results suggest an appropriate balance has been reached which maximizes the use of kidney biopsies while minimizing the risk of this invasive procedure (word count: 202). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2693431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26934312009-06-08 Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review Scheckner, Bari Peyser, Alexandra Rube, Jacob Tarapore, Freya Frank, Rachel Vento, Suzanne Hoffman, Cathy Valderrama, Elsa Charney, Douglas Goilav, Beatrice Trachtman, Howard BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center chart review was performed to test the hypothesis that at least 80% of native kidney biopsies provide clinically valuable information that rationally guides diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: 200 biopsies performed between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2008 were reviewed. A scheme composed of six categories was devised to classify the utility of each kidney biopsy. RESULTS: 196 complete case files were available for review. Twenty-four (12.2%) biopsies did not shed light on the diagnosis and were unhelpful in patient management – 21 biopsies (10.7%) were non-diagnostic and 3 (1.5%) failed to yield enough tissue for examination. The number of unhelpful biopsies did not cluster in any specific disease entity. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide guidance to nephrologists about the total risk of a kidney biopsy, including uninformative results, when seeking informed consent for the procedure. The results suggest an appropriate balance has been reached which maximizes the use of kidney biopsies while minimizing the risk of this invasive procedure (word count: 202). BioMed Central 2009-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2693431/ /pubmed/19460162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11 Text en Copyright ©2009 Scheckner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scheckner, Bari Peyser, Alexandra Rube, Jacob Tarapore, Freya Frank, Rachel Vento, Suzanne Hoffman, Cathy Valderrama, Elsa Charney, Douglas Goilav, Beatrice Trachtman, Howard Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title | Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title_full | Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title_short | Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
title_sort | diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schecknerbari diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT peyseralexandra diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT rubejacob diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT taraporefreya diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT frankrachel diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT ventosuzanne diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT hoffmancathy diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT valderramaelsa diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT charneydouglas diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT goilavbeatrice diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview AT trachtmanhoward diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview |