Cargando…

Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheckner, Bari, Peyser, Alexandra, Rube, Jacob, Tarapore, Freya, Frank, Rachel, Vento, Suzanne, Hoffman, Cathy, Valderrama, Elsa, Charney, Douglas, Goilav, Beatrice, Trachtman, Howard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11
_version_ 1782167955702808576
author Scheckner, Bari
Peyser, Alexandra
Rube, Jacob
Tarapore, Freya
Frank, Rachel
Vento, Suzanne
Hoffman, Cathy
Valderrama, Elsa
Charney, Douglas
Goilav, Beatrice
Trachtman, Howard
author_facet Scheckner, Bari
Peyser, Alexandra
Rube, Jacob
Tarapore, Freya
Frank, Rachel
Vento, Suzanne
Hoffman, Cathy
Valderrama, Elsa
Charney, Douglas
Goilav, Beatrice
Trachtman, Howard
author_sort Scheckner, Bari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center chart review was performed to test the hypothesis that at least 80% of native kidney biopsies provide clinically valuable information that rationally guides diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: 200 biopsies performed between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2008 were reviewed. A scheme composed of six categories was devised to classify the utility of each kidney biopsy. RESULTS: 196 complete case files were available for review. Twenty-four (12.2%) biopsies did not shed light on the diagnosis and were unhelpful in patient management – 21 biopsies (10.7%) were non-diagnostic and 3 (1.5%) failed to yield enough tissue for examination. The number of unhelpful biopsies did not cluster in any specific disease entity. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide guidance to nephrologists about the total risk of a kidney biopsy, including uninformative results, when seeking informed consent for the procedure. The results suggest an appropriate balance has been reached which maximizes the use of kidney biopsies while minimizing the risk of this invasive procedure (word count: 202).
format Text
id pubmed-2693431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26934312009-06-08 Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review Scheckner, Bari Peyser, Alexandra Rube, Jacob Tarapore, Freya Frank, Rachel Vento, Suzanne Hoffman, Cathy Valderrama, Elsa Charney, Douglas Goilav, Beatrice Trachtman, Howard BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the spectrum of diseases identified with a kidney biopsy and the complications of the procedure. However, few studies have examined the utility of the test to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment of pediatric patients. This retrospective, single-center chart review was performed to test the hypothesis that at least 80% of native kidney biopsies provide clinically valuable information that rationally guides diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: 200 biopsies performed between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2008 were reviewed. A scheme composed of six categories was devised to classify the utility of each kidney biopsy. RESULTS: 196 complete case files were available for review. Twenty-four (12.2%) biopsies did not shed light on the diagnosis and were unhelpful in patient management – 21 biopsies (10.7%) were non-diagnostic and 3 (1.5%) failed to yield enough tissue for examination. The number of unhelpful biopsies did not cluster in any specific disease entity. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide guidance to nephrologists about the total risk of a kidney biopsy, including uninformative results, when seeking informed consent for the procedure. The results suggest an appropriate balance has been reached which maximizes the use of kidney biopsies while minimizing the risk of this invasive procedure (word count: 202). BioMed Central 2009-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2693431/ /pubmed/19460162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11 Text en Copyright ©2009 Scheckner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scheckner, Bari
Peyser, Alexandra
Rube, Jacob
Tarapore, Freya
Frank, Rachel
Vento, Suzanne
Hoffman, Cathy
Valderrama, Elsa
Charney, Douglas
Goilav, Beatrice
Trachtman, Howard
Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title_full Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title_fullStr Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title_short Diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
title_sort diagnostic yield of renal biopsies: a retrospective single center review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-11
work_keys_str_mv AT schecknerbari diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT peyseralexandra diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT rubejacob diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT taraporefreya diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT frankrachel diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT ventosuzanne diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT hoffmancathy diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT valderramaelsa diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT charneydouglas diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT goilavbeatrice diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview
AT trachtmanhoward diagnosticyieldofrenalbiopsiesaretrospectivesinglecenterreview