Cargando…

Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: May, Carl R, Mair, Frances, Finch, Tracy, MacFarlane, Anne, Dowrick, Christopher, Treweek, Shaun, Rapley, Tim, Ballini, Luciana, Ong, Bie Nio, Rogers, Anne, Murray, Elizabeth, Elwyn, Glyn, Légaré, France, Gunn, Jane, Montori, Victor M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
_version_ 1782167964456321024
author May, Carl R
Mair, Frances
Finch, Tracy
MacFarlane, Anne
Dowrick, Christopher
Treweek, Shaun
Rapley, Tim
Ballini, Luciana
Ong, Bie Nio
Rogers, Anne
Murray, Elizabeth
Elwyn, Glyn
Légaré, France
Gunn, Jane
Montori, Victor M
author_facet May, Carl R
Mair, Frances
Finch, Tracy
MacFarlane, Anne
Dowrick, Christopher
Treweek, Shaun
Rapley, Tim
Ballini, Luciana
Ong, Bie Nio
Rogers, Anne
Murray, Elizabeth
Elwyn, Glyn
Légaré, France
Gunn, Jane
Montori, Victor M
author_sort May, Carl R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. RESULTS: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. CONCLUSION: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing.
format Text
id pubmed-2693517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26935172009-06-08 Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory May, Carl R Mair, Frances Finch, Tracy MacFarlane, Anne Dowrick, Christopher Treweek, Shaun Rapley, Tim Ballini, Luciana Ong, Bie Nio Rogers, Anne Murray, Elizabeth Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Gunn, Jane Montori, Victor M Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. RESULTS: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. CONCLUSION: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing. BioMed Central 2009-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2693517/ /pubmed/19460163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 Text en Copyright © 2009 May et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
May, Carl R
Mair, Frances
Finch, Tracy
MacFarlane, Anne
Dowrick, Christopher
Treweek, Shaun
Rapley, Tim
Ballini, Luciana
Ong, Bie Nio
Rogers, Anne
Murray, Elizabeth
Elwyn, Glyn
Légaré, France
Gunn, Jane
Montori, Victor M
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title_full Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title_fullStr Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title_full_unstemmed Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title_short Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
title_sort development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
work_keys_str_mv AT maycarlr developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT mairfrances developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT finchtracy developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT macfarlaneanne developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT dowrickchristopher developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT treweekshaun developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT rapleytim developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT balliniluciana developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT ongbienio developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT rogersanne developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT murrayelizabeth developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT elwynglyn developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT legarefrance developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT gunnjane developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory
AT montorivictorm developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory