Cargando…
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 |
_version_ | 1782167964456321024 |
---|---|
author | May, Carl R Mair, Frances Finch, Tracy MacFarlane, Anne Dowrick, Christopher Treweek, Shaun Rapley, Tim Ballini, Luciana Ong, Bie Nio Rogers, Anne Murray, Elizabeth Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Gunn, Jane Montori, Victor M |
author_facet | May, Carl R Mair, Frances Finch, Tracy MacFarlane, Anne Dowrick, Christopher Treweek, Shaun Rapley, Tim Ballini, Luciana Ong, Bie Nio Rogers, Anne Murray, Elizabeth Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Gunn, Jane Montori, Victor M |
author_sort | May, Carl R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. RESULTS: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. CONCLUSION: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2693517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26935172009-06-08 Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory May, Carl R Mair, Frances Finch, Tracy MacFarlane, Anne Dowrick, Christopher Treweek, Shaun Rapley, Tim Ballini, Luciana Ong, Bie Nio Rogers, Anne Murray, Elizabeth Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Gunn, Jane Montori, Victor M Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. RESULTS: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. CONCLUSION: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing. BioMed Central 2009-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2693517/ /pubmed/19460163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 Text en Copyright © 2009 May et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article May, Carl R Mair, Frances Finch, Tracy MacFarlane, Anne Dowrick, Christopher Treweek, Shaun Rapley, Tim Ballini, Luciana Ong, Bie Nio Rogers, Anne Murray, Elizabeth Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Gunn, Jane Montori, Victor M Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title | Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title_full | Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title_fullStr | Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title_short | Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory |
title_sort | development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maycarlr developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT mairfrances developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT finchtracy developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT macfarlaneanne developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT dowrickchristopher developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT treweekshaun developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT rapleytim developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT balliniluciana developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT ongbienio developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT rogersanne developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT murrayelizabeth developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT elwynglyn developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT legarefrance developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT gunnjane developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory AT montorivictorm developmentofatheoryofimplementationandintegrationnormalizationprocesstheory |