Cargando…

Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of altering the ratio of carbohydrate and protein in low-energy diets in conjunction with a popular exercise program in obese women. DESIGN: Matched, prospective clinical intervention study to assess efficacy of varying ratios of carbohydrate and prote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerksick, Chad, Thomas, Ashli, Campbell, Bill, Taylor, Lem, Wilborn, Colin, Marcello, Brandon, Roberts, Mike, Pfau, Emily, Grimstvedt, Megan, Opusunju, Jasmine, Magrans-Courtney, Teresa, Rasmussen, Christopher, Wilson, Ron, Kreider, Richard B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-6-23
_version_ 1782167964932374528
author Kerksick, Chad
Thomas, Ashli
Campbell, Bill
Taylor, Lem
Wilborn, Colin
Marcello, Brandon
Roberts, Mike
Pfau, Emily
Grimstvedt, Megan
Opusunju, Jasmine
Magrans-Courtney, Teresa
Rasmussen, Christopher
Wilson, Ron
Kreider, Richard B
author_facet Kerksick, Chad
Thomas, Ashli
Campbell, Bill
Taylor, Lem
Wilborn, Colin
Marcello, Brandon
Roberts, Mike
Pfau, Emily
Grimstvedt, Megan
Opusunju, Jasmine
Magrans-Courtney, Teresa
Rasmussen, Christopher
Wilson, Ron
Kreider, Richard B
author_sort Kerksick, Chad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of altering the ratio of carbohydrate and protein in low-energy diets in conjunction with a popular exercise program in obese women. DESIGN: Matched, prospective clinical intervention study to assess efficacy of varying ratios of carbohydrate and protein intake in conjunction with a regular exercise program. PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred sixty one sedentary, obese, pre-menopausal women (38.5 ± 8.5 yrs, 164.2 ± 6.7 cm, 94.2 ± 18.8 kg, 34.9 ± 6.4 kg·m(-2), 43.8 ± 4.2%) participated in this study. Participants were weight stable and not participating in additional weight loss programs. METHODS: Participants were assigned to either a no exercise + no diet control (CON), a no diet + exercise group (ND), or one of four diet + exercise groups (presented as kcals; % carbohydrate: protein: fat): 1) a high energy, high carbohydrate, low protein diet (HED) [2,600; 55:15:30%], 2) a very low carbohydrate, high protein diet (VLCHP) [1,200 kcals; 63:7:30%], 3) a low carbohydrate, moderate protein diet (LCMP) [1,200 kcals; 50:20:30%] and 4) a high carbohydrate, low protein diet (HCLP) [1,200 kcals; 55:15:30%]. Participants in exercise groups (all but CON) performed a pneumatic resistance-based, circuit training program under supervision three times per week. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric, body composition, resting energy expenditure (REE), fasting blood samples and muscular fitness assessments were examined at baseline and weeks 2, 10 and 14. RESULTS: All groups except CON experienced significant reductions (P < 0.05 – 0.001) in waist circumference over 14 weeks. VLCHP, LCHP and LPHC participants experienced similar but significant (P < 0.05 – 0.001) reductions in body mass when compared to other groups. Delta responses indicated that fat loss after 14 weeks was significantly greatest in VLCHP (95% CI: -5.2, -3.2 kg), LCMP (-4.0, -1.9 kg) and HCLP (-3.8, -2.1 kg) when compared to other groups. Subsequent reductions in % body fat were significantly greater in VLCHP, LCMP and HCLP participants. Initial dieting decreased (P < 0.05) relative REE similarly in all groups. All exercise groups significantly (P < 0.05) improved in muscular fitness, but these improvements were not different among groups. Favorable but non-significant mean changes occurred in lipid panels, glucose and HOMA-IR. Leptin levels decreased (P < 0.05) in all groups, except for CON, after two weeks of dieting and remained lower throughout the 14 week program. Exercise participation resulted in significant improvements in quality of life and body image. CONCLUSION: Exercise alone (ND) appears to have minimal impact on measured outcomes with positive outcomes apparent when exercise is combined with a hypoenergetic diet. Greater improvements in waist circumference and body composition occurred when carbohydrate is replaced in the diet with protein. Weight loss in all diet groups (VLCHP, LCMP and HCLP) was primarily fat and stimulated improvements in markers of cardiovascular disease risk, body composition, energy expenditure and psychosocial parameters.
format Text
id pubmed-2693519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26935192009-06-08 Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women Kerksick, Chad Thomas, Ashli Campbell, Bill Taylor, Lem Wilborn, Colin Marcello, Brandon Roberts, Mike Pfau, Emily Grimstvedt, Megan Opusunju, Jasmine Magrans-Courtney, Teresa Rasmussen, Christopher Wilson, Ron Kreider, Richard B Nutr Metab (Lond) Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of altering the ratio of carbohydrate and protein in low-energy diets in conjunction with a popular exercise program in obese women. DESIGN: Matched, prospective clinical intervention study to assess efficacy of varying ratios of carbohydrate and protein intake in conjunction with a regular exercise program. PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred sixty one sedentary, obese, pre-menopausal women (38.5 ± 8.5 yrs, 164.2 ± 6.7 cm, 94.2 ± 18.8 kg, 34.9 ± 6.4 kg·m(-2), 43.8 ± 4.2%) participated in this study. Participants were weight stable and not participating in additional weight loss programs. METHODS: Participants were assigned to either a no exercise + no diet control (CON), a no diet + exercise group (ND), or one of four diet + exercise groups (presented as kcals; % carbohydrate: protein: fat): 1) a high energy, high carbohydrate, low protein diet (HED) [2,600; 55:15:30%], 2) a very low carbohydrate, high protein diet (VLCHP) [1,200 kcals; 63:7:30%], 3) a low carbohydrate, moderate protein diet (LCMP) [1,200 kcals; 50:20:30%] and 4) a high carbohydrate, low protein diet (HCLP) [1,200 kcals; 55:15:30%]. Participants in exercise groups (all but CON) performed a pneumatic resistance-based, circuit training program under supervision three times per week. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric, body composition, resting energy expenditure (REE), fasting blood samples and muscular fitness assessments were examined at baseline and weeks 2, 10 and 14. RESULTS: All groups except CON experienced significant reductions (P < 0.05 – 0.001) in waist circumference over 14 weeks. VLCHP, LCHP and LPHC participants experienced similar but significant (P < 0.05 – 0.001) reductions in body mass when compared to other groups. Delta responses indicated that fat loss after 14 weeks was significantly greatest in VLCHP (95% CI: -5.2, -3.2 kg), LCMP (-4.0, -1.9 kg) and HCLP (-3.8, -2.1 kg) when compared to other groups. Subsequent reductions in % body fat were significantly greater in VLCHP, LCMP and HCLP participants. Initial dieting decreased (P < 0.05) relative REE similarly in all groups. All exercise groups significantly (P < 0.05) improved in muscular fitness, but these improvements were not different among groups. Favorable but non-significant mean changes occurred in lipid panels, glucose and HOMA-IR. Leptin levels decreased (P < 0.05) in all groups, except for CON, after two weeks of dieting and remained lower throughout the 14 week program. Exercise participation resulted in significant improvements in quality of life and body image. CONCLUSION: Exercise alone (ND) appears to have minimal impact on measured outcomes with positive outcomes apparent when exercise is combined with a hypoenergetic diet. Greater improvements in waist circumference and body composition occurred when carbohydrate is replaced in the diet with protein. Weight loss in all diet groups (VLCHP, LCMP and HCLP) was primarily fat and stimulated improvements in markers of cardiovascular disease risk, body composition, energy expenditure and psychosocial parameters. BioMed Central 2009-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2693519/ /pubmed/19442301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-6-23 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kerksick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kerksick, Chad
Thomas, Ashli
Campbell, Bill
Taylor, Lem
Wilborn, Colin
Marcello, Brandon
Roberts, Mike
Pfau, Emily
Grimstvedt, Megan
Opusunju, Jasmine
Magrans-Courtney, Teresa
Rasmussen, Christopher
Wilson, Ron
Kreider, Richard B
Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title_full Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title_fullStr Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title_short Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
title_sort effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-6-23
work_keys_str_mv AT kerksickchad effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT thomasashli effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT campbellbill effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT taylorlem effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT wilborncolin effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT marcellobrandon effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT robertsmike effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT pfauemily effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT grimstvedtmegan effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT opusunjujasmine effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT magranscourtneyteresa effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT rasmussenchristopher effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT wilsonron effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen
AT kreiderrichardb effectsofapopularexerciseandweightlossprogramonweightlossbodycompositionenergyexpenditureandhealthinobesewomen