Cargando…
Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37 |
_version_ | 1782168047807627264 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Chiung-Ling Lee, Ming-Yung Tyan, Yeu-Sheng Kok, Lai-Fong Wu, Tina S Koo, Chiew-Loon Wang, Po-Hui Chao, Kuan-Chong Han, Chih-Ping |
author_facet | Liao, Chiung-Ling Lee, Ming-Yung Tyan, Yeu-Sheng Kok, Lai-Fong Wu, Tina S Koo, Chiew-Loon Wang, Po-Hui Chao, Kuan-Chong Han, Chih-Ping |
author_sort | Liao, Chiung-Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value to the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed using paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues from 38 hysterectomy specimens, including 14 ECA and 24 EMA. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections were immunostained with 4 antibodies, using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method for antigen visualization. The staining intensity and extent of the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions were appraised using a semi-quantitative scoring system. RESULTS: The three markers (ER, Vim and CEA) and their respective panel expressions showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) frequency differences between ECA and EMA tumors. Although the additional ancillary PR-marker also revealed a significant frequency difference (p < 0.05) between ECA and EMA tumors, it did not demonstrate any supplementary benefit to the 3-marker panel. CONCLUSION: According to our data, when histomorphological and clinical doubt exists as to the primary site of origin, we recommend that the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel is easier, sufficient and appropriate to use in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Although the 4-marker panel containing PR also reveals statistically significant results, the PR-marker offers no supplemental benefit to the pre-existing 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in the diagnostic distinction between ECA and EMA. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2694169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26941692009-06-09 Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study Liao, Chiung-Ling Lee, Ming-Yung Tyan, Yeu-Sheng Kok, Lai-Fong Wu, Tina S Koo, Chiew-Loon Wang, Po-Hui Chao, Kuan-Chong Han, Chih-Ping J Transl Med Research OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value to the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed using paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues from 38 hysterectomy specimens, including 14 ECA and 24 EMA. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections were immunostained with 4 antibodies, using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method for antigen visualization. The staining intensity and extent of the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions were appraised using a semi-quantitative scoring system. RESULTS: The three markers (ER, Vim and CEA) and their respective panel expressions showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) frequency differences between ECA and EMA tumors. Although the additional ancillary PR-marker also revealed a significant frequency difference (p < 0.05) between ECA and EMA tumors, it did not demonstrate any supplementary benefit to the 3-marker panel. CONCLUSION: According to our data, when histomorphological and clinical doubt exists as to the primary site of origin, we recommend that the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel is easier, sufficient and appropriate to use in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Although the 4-marker panel containing PR also reveals statistically significant results, the PR-marker offers no supplemental benefit to the pre-existing 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in the diagnostic distinction between ECA and EMA. BioMed Central 2009-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2694169/ /pubmed/19476621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37 Text en Copyright © 2009 Liao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Liao, Chiung-Ling Lee, Ming-Yung Tyan, Yeu-Sheng Kok, Lai-Fong Wu, Tina S Koo, Chiew-Loon Wang, Po-Hui Chao, Kuan-Chong Han, Chih-Ping Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title | Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title_full | Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title_fullStr | Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title_full_unstemmed | Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title_short | Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
title_sort | progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaochiungling progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT leemingyung progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT tyanyeusheng progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT koklaifong progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT wutinas progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT koochiewloon progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT wangpohui progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT chaokuanchong progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens AT hanchihping progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens |