Cargando…

Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study

OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Chiung-Ling, Lee, Ming-Yung, Tyan, Yeu-Sheng, Kok, Lai-Fong, Wu, Tina S, Koo, Chiew-Loon, Wang, Po-Hui, Chao, Kuan-Chong, Han, Chih-Ping
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37
_version_ 1782168047807627264
author Liao, Chiung-Ling
Lee, Ming-Yung
Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
Kok, Lai-Fong
Wu, Tina S
Koo, Chiew-Loon
Wang, Po-Hui
Chao, Kuan-Chong
Han, Chih-Ping
author_facet Liao, Chiung-Ling
Lee, Ming-Yung
Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
Kok, Lai-Fong
Wu, Tina S
Koo, Chiew-Loon
Wang, Po-Hui
Chao, Kuan-Chong
Han, Chih-Ping
author_sort Liao, Chiung-Ling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value to the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed using paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues from 38 hysterectomy specimens, including 14 ECA and 24 EMA. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections were immunostained with 4 antibodies, using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method for antigen visualization. The staining intensity and extent of the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions were appraised using a semi-quantitative scoring system. RESULTS: The three markers (ER, Vim and CEA) and their respective panel expressions showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) frequency differences between ECA and EMA tumors. Although the additional ancillary PR-marker also revealed a significant frequency difference (p < 0.05) between ECA and EMA tumors, it did not demonstrate any supplementary benefit to the 3-marker panel. CONCLUSION: According to our data, when histomorphological and clinical doubt exists as to the primary site of origin, we recommend that the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel is easier, sufficient and appropriate to use in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Although the 4-marker panel containing PR also reveals statistically significant results, the PR-marker offers no supplemental benefit to the pre-existing 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in the diagnostic distinction between ECA and EMA.
format Text
id pubmed-2694169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26941692009-06-09 Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study Liao, Chiung-Ling Lee, Ming-Yung Tyan, Yeu-Sheng Kok, Lai-Fong Wu, Tina S Koo, Chiew-Loon Wang, Po-Hui Chao, Kuan-Chong Han, Chih-Ping J Transl Med Research OBJECTIVE: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value to the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed using paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues from 38 hysterectomy specimens, including 14 ECA and 24 EMA. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections were immunostained with 4 antibodies, using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method for antigen visualization. The staining intensity and extent of the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions were appraised using a semi-quantitative scoring system. RESULTS: The three markers (ER, Vim and CEA) and their respective panel expressions showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) frequency differences between ECA and EMA tumors. Although the additional ancillary PR-marker also revealed a significant frequency difference (p < 0.05) between ECA and EMA tumors, it did not demonstrate any supplementary benefit to the 3-marker panel. CONCLUSION: According to our data, when histomorphological and clinical doubt exists as to the primary site of origin, we recommend that the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel is easier, sufficient and appropriate to use in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Although the 4-marker panel containing PR also reveals statistically significant results, the PR-marker offers no supplemental benefit to the pre-existing 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in the diagnostic distinction between ECA and EMA. BioMed Central 2009-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2694169/ /pubmed/19476621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37 Text en Copyright © 2009 Liao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Liao, Chiung-Ling
Lee, Ming-Yung
Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
Kok, Lai-Fong
Wu, Tina S
Koo, Chiew-Loon
Wang, Po-Hui
Chao, Kuan-Chong
Han, Chih-Ping
Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title_full Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title_fullStr Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title_full_unstemmed Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title_short Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
title_sort progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-37
work_keys_str_mv AT liaochiungling progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT leemingyung progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT tyanyeusheng progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT koklaifong progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT wutinas progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT koochiewloon progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT wangpohui progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT chaokuanchong progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens
AT hanchihping progesteronereceptordoesnotimprovetheperformanceandtesteffectivenessoftheconventional3markerpanelconsistingofestrogenreceptorvimentinandcarcinoembryonicantigenindistinguishingbetweenprimaryendocervicalandendometrialadenocarcinomasinatissuemicroarrayextens