Cargando…

Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasamatsu, T, Onda, T, Sawada, M, Kato, T, Ikeda, S, Sasajima, Y, Tsuda, H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048
_version_ 1782168092609085440
author Kasamatsu, T
Onda, T
Sawada, M
Kato, T
Ikeda, S
Sasajima, Y
Tsuda, H
author_facet Kasamatsu, T
Onda, T
Sawada, M
Kato, T
Ikeda, S
Sasajima, Y
Tsuda, H
author_sort Kasamatsu, T
collection PubMed
description A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty-three FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC and 455 patients with SCC, who all underwent primary radical hysterectomy, were reviewed. Among the patients with AC, Cox model identified tumour size (95% CI: 1.35–30.71) and node metastasis (95% CI: 5.09–53.44) as independent prognostic factors for survival, and infiltration to vagina (95% CI: 1.15–5.76) and node metastasis (95% CI: 6.39–58.87) as independent prognostic factors for relapse. No significant difference was found in survival or relapse between the AC and SCC groups, after adjusting for other clinicopathological characteristics using Cox model. No significant difference was found in the positive rates of lymph nodes or location of initial failure sites between the two groups, but ovarian metastatic rate was significantly higher in patients with pathologic stage IIB AC (P=0.02). Positive node is a common independent prognostic factor for survival and relapse of patients with AC. FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC or SCC, who underwent radical hysterectomy, have similar prognosis and spread pattern, but different ovarian metastasis rates.
format Text
id pubmed-2694432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26944322010-05-05 Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix Kasamatsu, T Onda, T Sawada, M Kato, T Ikeda, S Sasajima, Y Tsuda, H Br J Cancer Clinical Study A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty-three FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC and 455 patients with SCC, who all underwent primary radical hysterectomy, were reviewed. Among the patients with AC, Cox model identified tumour size (95% CI: 1.35–30.71) and node metastasis (95% CI: 5.09–53.44) as independent prognostic factors for survival, and infiltration to vagina (95% CI: 1.15–5.76) and node metastasis (95% CI: 6.39–58.87) as independent prognostic factors for relapse. No significant difference was found in survival or relapse between the AC and SCC groups, after adjusting for other clinicopathological characteristics using Cox model. No significant difference was found in the positive rates of lymph nodes or location of initial failure sites between the two groups, but ovarian metastatic rate was significantly higher in patients with pathologic stage IIB AC (P=0.02). Positive node is a common independent prognostic factor for survival and relapse of patients with AC. FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC or SCC, who underwent radical hysterectomy, have similar prognosis and spread pattern, but different ovarian metastasis rates. Nature Publishing Group 2009-05-05 2009-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2694432/ /pubmed/19401699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kasamatsu, T
Onda, T
Sawada, M
Kato, T
Ikeda, S
Sasajima, Y
Tsuda, H
Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title_full Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title_fullStr Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title_full_unstemmed Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title_short Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
title_sort radical hysterectomy for figo stage i–iib adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048
work_keys_str_mv AT kasamatsut radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT ondat radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT sawadam radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT katot radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT ikedas radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT sasajimay radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix
AT tsudah radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix