Cargando…
Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048 |
_version_ | 1782168092609085440 |
---|---|
author | Kasamatsu, T Onda, T Sawada, M Kato, T Ikeda, S Sasajima, Y Tsuda, H |
author_facet | Kasamatsu, T Onda, T Sawada, M Kato, T Ikeda, S Sasajima, Y Tsuda, H |
author_sort | Kasamatsu, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty-three FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC and 455 patients with SCC, who all underwent primary radical hysterectomy, were reviewed. Among the patients with AC, Cox model identified tumour size (95% CI: 1.35–30.71) and node metastasis (95% CI: 5.09–53.44) as independent prognostic factors for survival, and infiltration to vagina (95% CI: 1.15–5.76) and node metastasis (95% CI: 6.39–58.87) as independent prognostic factors for relapse. No significant difference was found in survival or relapse between the AC and SCC groups, after adjusting for other clinicopathological characteristics using Cox model. No significant difference was found in the positive rates of lymph nodes or location of initial failure sites between the two groups, but ovarian metastatic rate was significantly higher in patients with pathologic stage IIB AC (P=0.02). Positive node is a common independent prognostic factor for survival and relapse of patients with AC. FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC or SCC, who underwent radical hysterectomy, have similar prognosis and spread pattern, but different ovarian metastasis rates. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2694432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26944322010-05-05 Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix Kasamatsu, T Onda, T Sawada, M Kato, T Ikeda, S Sasajima, Y Tsuda, H Br J Cancer Clinical Study A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify risk factors for survival and relapse in patients with FIGO stage I–IIB cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), who underwent radical hysterectomy, and to compare outcome and spread pattern with those of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One hundred and twenty-three FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC and 455 patients with SCC, who all underwent primary radical hysterectomy, were reviewed. Among the patients with AC, Cox model identified tumour size (95% CI: 1.35–30.71) and node metastasis (95% CI: 5.09–53.44) as independent prognostic factors for survival, and infiltration to vagina (95% CI: 1.15–5.76) and node metastasis (95% CI: 6.39–58.87) as independent prognostic factors for relapse. No significant difference was found in survival or relapse between the AC and SCC groups, after adjusting for other clinicopathological characteristics using Cox model. No significant difference was found in the positive rates of lymph nodes or location of initial failure sites between the two groups, but ovarian metastatic rate was significantly higher in patients with pathologic stage IIB AC (P=0.02). Positive node is a common independent prognostic factor for survival and relapse of patients with AC. FIGO stage I–IIB patients with AC or SCC, who underwent radical hysterectomy, have similar prognosis and spread pattern, but different ovarian metastasis rates. Nature Publishing Group 2009-05-05 2009-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2694432/ /pubmed/19401699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kasamatsu, T Onda, T Sawada, M Kato, T Ikeda, S Sasajima, Y Tsuda, H Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title | Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title_full | Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title_fullStr | Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title_full_unstemmed | Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title_short | Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
title_sort | radical hysterectomy for figo stage i–iib adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasamatsut radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT ondat radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT sawadam radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT katot radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT ikedas radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT sasajimay radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix AT tsudah radicalhysterectomyforfigostageiiibadenocarcinomaoftheuterinecervix |