Cargando…

Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the level of air contamination with bacteria after surgical hydrodebridement and to determine the effectiveness of hydro surgery on bacterial reduction of a simulated infected wound. METHODS: Four porcine samples were scored then infected with a br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowling, Frank L, Stickings, Daryl S, Edwards-Jones, Valerie, Armstrong, David G, Boulton, Andrew JM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-13
_version_ 1782168119030054912
author Bowling, Frank L
Stickings, Daryl S
Edwards-Jones, Valerie
Armstrong, David G
Boulton, Andrew JM
author_facet Bowling, Frank L
Stickings, Daryl S
Edwards-Jones, Valerie
Armstrong, David G
Boulton, Andrew JM
author_sort Bowling, Frank L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the level of air contamination with bacteria after surgical hydrodebridement and to determine the effectiveness of hydro surgery on bacterial reduction of a simulated infected wound. METHODS: Four porcine samples were scored then infected with a broth culture containing a variety of organisms and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The infected samples were then debrided with the hydro surgery tool (Versajet, Smith and Nephew, Largo, Florida, USA). Samples were taken for microbiology, histology and scanning electron microscopy pre-infection, post infection and post debridement. Air bacterial contamination was evaluated before, during and after debridement by using active and passive methods; for active sampling the SAS-Super 90 air sampler was used, for passive sampling settle plates were located at set distances around the clinic room. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant reduction in bacterial contamination of the porcine samples post hydrodebridement. Analysis of the passive sampling showed a significant (p < 0.001) increase in microbial counts post hydrodebridement. Levels ranging from 950 colony forming units per meter cubed (CFUs/m(3)) to 16780 CFUs/m(3 )were observed with active sampling of the air whilst using hydro surgery equipment compared with a basal count of 582 CFUs/m(3). During removal of the wound dressing, a significant increase was observed relative to basal counts (p < 0.05). Microbial load of the air samples was still significantly raised 1 hour post-therapy. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a significant increase in bacterial air contamination both by active sampling and passive sampling. We believe that action might be taken to mitigate fallout in the settings in which this technique is used.
format Text
id pubmed-2694772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26947722009-06-11 Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination Bowling, Frank L Stickings, Daryl S Edwards-Jones, Valerie Armstrong, David G Boulton, Andrew JM J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the level of air contamination with bacteria after surgical hydrodebridement and to determine the effectiveness of hydro surgery on bacterial reduction of a simulated infected wound. METHODS: Four porcine samples were scored then infected with a broth culture containing a variety of organisms and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The infected samples were then debrided with the hydro surgery tool (Versajet, Smith and Nephew, Largo, Florida, USA). Samples were taken for microbiology, histology and scanning electron microscopy pre-infection, post infection and post debridement. Air bacterial contamination was evaluated before, during and after debridement by using active and passive methods; for active sampling the SAS-Super 90 air sampler was used, for passive sampling settle plates were located at set distances around the clinic room. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant reduction in bacterial contamination of the porcine samples post hydrodebridement. Analysis of the passive sampling showed a significant (p < 0.001) increase in microbial counts post hydrodebridement. Levels ranging from 950 colony forming units per meter cubed (CFUs/m(3)) to 16780 CFUs/m(3 )were observed with active sampling of the air whilst using hydro surgery equipment compared with a basal count of 582 CFUs/m(3). During removal of the wound dressing, a significant increase was observed relative to basal counts (p < 0.05). Microbial load of the air samples was still significantly raised 1 hour post-therapy. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a significant increase in bacterial air contamination both by active sampling and passive sampling. We believe that action might be taken to mitigate fallout in the settings in which this technique is used. BioMed Central 2009-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2694772/ /pubmed/19426486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-13 Text en Copyright © 2009 Bowling et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bowling, Frank L
Stickings, Daryl S
Edwards-Jones, Valerie
Armstrong, David G
Boulton, Andrew JM
Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title_full Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title_fullStr Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title_full_unstemmed Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title_short Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
title_sort hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-13
work_keys_str_mv AT bowlingfrankl hydrodebridementofwoundseffectivenessinreducingwoundbacterialcontaminationandpotentialforairbacterialcontamination
AT stickingsdaryls hydrodebridementofwoundseffectivenessinreducingwoundbacterialcontaminationandpotentialforairbacterialcontamination
AT edwardsjonesvalerie hydrodebridementofwoundseffectivenessinreducingwoundbacterialcontaminationandpotentialforairbacterialcontamination
AT armstrongdavidg hydrodebridementofwoundseffectivenessinreducingwoundbacterialcontaminationandpotentialforairbacterialcontamination
AT boultonandrewjm hydrodebridementofwoundseffectivenessinreducingwoundbacterialcontaminationandpotentialforairbacterialcontamination