Cargando…

Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert

Supplementation of progesterone in the luteal phase and continuance of progesterone therapy during the first trimester has been found in several studies to have benefits in promoting fertility, preventing miscarriages and even preventing pre-term labor. Though it can be administered orally, intramus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Check, Jerome H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19753133
_version_ 1782168176053714944
author Check, Jerome H
author_facet Check, Jerome H
author_sort Check, Jerome H
collection PubMed
description Supplementation of progesterone in the luteal phase and continuance of progesterone therapy during the first trimester has been found in several studies to have benefits in promoting fertility, preventing miscarriages and even preventing pre-term labor. Though it can be administered orally, intramuscularly or even sublingually, a very effective route with fewer side effects can be achieved by an intravaginal route. The first vaginal preparations were not made commercially but were compounded by pharmacies. This had the disadvantage of lack of control by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ensuring efficacy of the preparations. Furthermore there was a lack of precise dosing leading to batch to batch variation. The first commercially approved vaginal progesterone preparation in the United States was a vaginal gel which has proven very effective. The main side effect was accumulation of a buildup of the vaginal gel sometimes leading to irritation. Natural micronized progesterone for vaginal administration with the brand name of Utrogestan A(®) had been approved even before the gel in certain European countries. Endometrin(®) vaginal tablets are the newest natural progesterone approved by the FDA. Comparisons to the vaginal gel and to intramuscular progesterone have shown similar efficacy especially in studies following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocyte egg retrieval and embryo transfer. Larger studies are needed to compare side effects.
format Text
id pubmed-2695240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26952402009-06-16 Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert Check, Jerome H Ther Clin Risk Manag Review Supplementation of progesterone in the luteal phase and continuance of progesterone therapy during the first trimester has been found in several studies to have benefits in promoting fertility, preventing miscarriages and even preventing pre-term labor. Though it can be administered orally, intramuscularly or even sublingually, a very effective route with fewer side effects can be achieved by an intravaginal route. The first vaginal preparations were not made commercially but were compounded by pharmacies. This had the disadvantage of lack of control by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ensuring efficacy of the preparations. Furthermore there was a lack of precise dosing leading to batch to batch variation. The first commercially approved vaginal progesterone preparation in the United States was a vaginal gel which has proven very effective. The main side effect was accumulation of a buildup of the vaginal gel sometimes leading to irritation. Natural micronized progesterone for vaginal administration with the brand name of Utrogestan A(®) had been approved even before the gel in certain European countries. Endometrin(®) vaginal tablets are the newest natural progesterone approved by the FDA. Comparisons to the vaginal gel and to intramuscular progesterone have shown similar efficacy especially in studies following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocyte egg retrieval and embryo transfer. Larger studies are needed to compare side effects. Dove Medical Press 2009 2009-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2695240/ /pubmed/19753133 Text en © 2009 Check, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.
spellingShingle Review
Check, Jerome H
Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title_full Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title_fullStr Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title_full_unstemmed Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title_short Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
title_sort luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on endometrin® (progesterone) vaginal insert
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19753133
work_keys_str_mv AT checkjeromeh lutealphasesupportinassistedreproductivetechnologytreatmentfocusonendometrinprogesteronevaginalinsert