Cargando…

Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily

The OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guardino, Kaitlyn M., Sheftic, Sarah R., Slattery, Robert E., Alexandrescu, Andrei T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19564956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms10052412
_version_ 1782168184408768512
author Guardino, Kaitlyn M.
Sheftic, Sarah R.
Slattery, Robert E.
Alexandrescu, Andrei T.
author_facet Guardino, Kaitlyn M.
Sheftic, Sarah R.
Slattery, Robert E.
Alexandrescu, Andrei T.
author_sort Guardino, Kaitlyn M.
collection PubMed
description The OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the conserved β-barrels were larger than sites in non-conserved segments. In this work we examined a database of 80 representative domain structures currently classified as OB-folds, to establish the basis of this effect. Residue-specific values were obtained for the number of Cα-Cα distance contacts, sequence hydrophobicities, crystallographic B-factors, and theoretical B-factors calculated from a Gaussian Network Model. All four parameters point to a larger average flexibility for the non-conserved structures compared to the conserved β-barrels. The theoretical B-factors and contact densities show the highest sensitivity. Our results suggest a model of protein structure evolution in which novel structural features develop at the periphery of conserved motifs. Core residues are more resistant to structural changes during evolution since their substitution would disrupt a larger number of interactions. Similar factors are likely to account for the differences in stability to unfolding between conserved and non-conserved structures.
format Text
id pubmed-2695284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26952842009-06-29 Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily Guardino, Kaitlyn M. Sheftic, Sarah R. Slattery, Robert E. Alexandrescu, Andrei T. Int J Mol Sci Article The OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the conserved β-barrels were larger than sites in non-conserved segments. In this work we examined a database of 80 representative domain structures currently classified as OB-folds, to establish the basis of this effect. Residue-specific values were obtained for the number of Cα-Cα distance contacts, sequence hydrophobicities, crystallographic B-factors, and theoretical B-factors calculated from a Gaussian Network Model. All four parameters point to a larger average flexibility for the non-conserved structures compared to the conserved β-barrels. The theoretical B-factors and contact densities show the highest sensitivity. Our results suggest a model of protein structure evolution in which novel structural features develop at the periphery of conserved motifs. Core residues are more resistant to structural changes during evolution since their substitution would disrupt a larger number of interactions. Similar factors are likely to account for the differences in stability to unfolding between conserved and non-conserved structures. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2009-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2695284/ /pubmed/19564956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms10052412 Text en © 2009 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guardino, Kaitlyn M.
Sheftic, Sarah R.
Slattery, Robert E.
Alexandrescu, Andrei T.
Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_full Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_fullStr Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_full_unstemmed Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_short Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_sort relative stabilities of conserved and non-conserved structures in the ob-fold superfamily
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19564956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms10052412
work_keys_str_mv AT guardinokaitlynm relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT shefticsarahr relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT slatteryroberte relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT alexandrescuandreit relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily