Cargando…

Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital

BACKGROUND: The frequency of drug prescription errors is high. Excluding errors in decision making, the remaining are mainly due to order ambiguity, non standard nomenclature and writing illegibility. The aim of this study is to analyse, as a part of a continuous quality improvement program, the qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calligaris, Laura, Panzera, Angela, Arnoldo, Luca, Londero, Carla, Quattrin, Rosanna, Troncon, Maria G, Brusaferro, Silvio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19439066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-9
_version_ 1782168189153574912
author Calligaris, Laura
Panzera, Angela
Arnoldo, Luca
Londero, Carla
Quattrin, Rosanna
Troncon, Maria G
Brusaferro, Silvio
author_facet Calligaris, Laura
Panzera, Angela
Arnoldo, Luca
Londero, Carla
Quattrin, Rosanna
Troncon, Maria G
Brusaferro, Silvio
author_sort Calligaris, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The frequency of drug prescription errors is high. Excluding errors in decision making, the remaining are mainly due to order ambiguity, non standard nomenclature and writing illegibility. The aim of this study is to analyse, as a part of a continuous quality improvement program, the quality of prescriptions writing for antibiotics, in an Italian University Hospital as a risk factor for prescription errors. METHODS: The point prevalence survey, carried out in May 26–30 2008, involved 41 inpatient Units. Every parenteral or oral antibiotic prescription was analysed for legibility (generic or brand drug name, dose, frequency of administration) and completeness (generic or brand name, dose, frequency of administration, route of administration, date of prescription and signature of the prescriber). Eight doctors (residents in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine) and two pharmacists performed the survey by reviewing the clinical records of medical, surgical or intensive care section inpatients. The antibiotics drug category was chosen because its use is widespread in the setting considered. RESULTS: Out of 756 inpatients included in the study, 408 antibiotic prescriptions were found in 298 patients (mean prescriptions per patient 1.4; SD ± 0.6). Overall 92.7% (38/41) of the Units had at least one patient with antibiotic prescription. Legibility was in compliance with 78.9% of generic or brand names, 69.4% of doses, 80.1% of frequency of administration, whereas completeness was fulfilled for 95.6% of generic or brand names, 76.7% of doses, 83.6% of frequency of administration, 87% of routes of administration, 43.9% of dates of prescription and 33.3% of physician's signature. Overall 23.9% of prescriptions were illegible and 29.9% of prescriptions were incomplete. Legibility and completeness are higher in unusual drugs prescriptions. CONCLUSION: The Intensive Care Section performed best as far as quality of prescription writing was concerned when compared with the Medical and Surgical Sections. Nevertheless the overall illegibility and incompleteness (above 20%) are unacceptably high. Values need to be improved by enhancing the safety culture and in particular the awareness of the professionals on the consequences that a bad prescription writing can produce.
format Text
id pubmed-2695418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26954182009-06-12 Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital Calligaris, Laura Panzera, Angela Arnoldo, Luca Londero, Carla Quattrin, Rosanna Troncon, Maria G Brusaferro, Silvio BMC Clin Pharmacol Research Article BACKGROUND: The frequency of drug prescription errors is high. Excluding errors in decision making, the remaining are mainly due to order ambiguity, non standard nomenclature and writing illegibility. The aim of this study is to analyse, as a part of a continuous quality improvement program, the quality of prescriptions writing for antibiotics, in an Italian University Hospital as a risk factor for prescription errors. METHODS: The point prevalence survey, carried out in May 26–30 2008, involved 41 inpatient Units. Every parenteral or oral antibiotic prescription was analysed for legibility (generic or brand drug name, dose, frequency of administration) and completeness (generic or brand name, dose, frequency of administration, route of administration, date of prescription and signature of the prescriber). Eight doctors (residents in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine) and two pharmacists performed the survey by reviewing the clinical records of medical, surgical or intensive care section inpatients. The antibiotics drug category was chosen because its use is widespread in the setting considered. RESULTS: Out of 756 inpatients included in the study, 408 antibiotic prescriptions were found in 298 patients (mean prescriptions per patient 1.4; SD ± 0.6). Overall 92.7% (38/41) of the Units had at least one patient with antibiotic prescription. Legibility was in compliance with 78.9% of generic or brand names, 69.4% of doses, 80.1% of frequency of administration, whereas completeness was fulfilled for 95.6% of generic or brand names, 76.7% of doses, 83.6% of frequency of administration, 87% of routes of administration, 43.9% of dates of prescription and 33.3% of physician's signature. Overall 23.9% of prescriptions were illegible and 29.9% of prescriptions were incomplete. Legibility and completeness are higher in unusual drugs prescriptions. CONCLUSION: The Intensive Care Section performed best as far as quality of prescription writing was concerned when compared with the Medical and Surgical Sections. Nevertheless the overall illegibility and incompleteness (above 20%) are unacceptably high. Values need to be improved by enhancing the safety culture and in particular the awareness of the professionals on the consequences that a bad prescription writing can produce. BioMed Central 2009-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2695418/ /pubmed/19439066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-9 Text en Copyright © 2009 Calligaris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Calligaris, Laura
Panzera, Angela
Arnoldo, Luca
Londero, Carla
Quattrin, Rosanna
Troncon, Maria G
Brusaferro, Silvio
Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title_full Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title_fullStr Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title_full_unstemmed Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title_short Errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
title_sort errors and omissions in hospital prescriptions: a survey of prescription writing in a hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19439066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-9
work_keys_str_mv AT calligarislaura errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT panzeraangela errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT arnoldoluca errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT londerocarla errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT quattrinrosanna errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT tronconmariag errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital
AT brusaferrosilvio errorsandomissionsinhospitalprescriptionsasurveyofprescriptionwritinginahospital